"THE FIRST RULE OF LEADERSHIP" AND THE OTHER FOUR RULES OF LEADERSHIP

“The First Rule of Leadership” and the other Four First Rules of Leadership!
By: Dr. Joseph A. Devine

 It has been written, “There is nothing magical about leadership” and yet the very essence of leadership remains elusive to many.  The definitions of leadership and management are used interchangeably and generally incorrectly.  Justice Potter Stewart in Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184 (1964) wrote of defining pornography that he may “never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it…”

The same can be said of leadership!  Definitions are seemingly veiled in the fog of cultural, historic, ethnic and professional relativism.  And yet, although we may not be able to articulate a concise definition of leadership, we know it when we “see it.”

As true leadership is “influence,”it is more likely to be felt than seen.  Its effects may be dynamic, intense, transformational, radical, revolutional, transactional, evolutionary or subtle, but leadership will always lead to change.   Bias for change is inherent in the DNA of all true leaders.  Challenging the status quo, disrupting comfort zones, fostering or forcing transformation of individuals, groups and systems is the very essence of leadership. 

Many volumes have been published about leadership and the “flavor of the month” leadership styles.  Most of these provoke thought while some simply repackage old and worn-out theories. Having waded through the fog of researching and teaching leadership theories since 1993, I have synthesized several pragmatic leadership principles.  These principles may serve as the primary content of your “leadership toolbox,”quite distinct from your “management toolbox.”  It is my belief that leadership can be taught and that leadership traits are not exclusively a matter of birth.   I also contend that although “managers lead and leaders manage” they are entirely distinct disciplines and behaviors.

                                             The First Five First Rules of Leadership!

 The First-First Rule

SHUT THE “F”…UP AND LISTEN!

 And yes, this means you!Listen to your inner voice, to your mentors and above all to your followers.  Leadership experts generally preach that leaders need to communicate their vision, their mission and their passion.  Although true, it is only half the equation at best.  Your followers will likely have operational (real world) information that you will need to hear.  They may need clarification or more importantly may simply need you to listen. Be ready and open to hear things that may challenge your assumptions, your perceptions, your skills and yes even your ego. Taking time to listen may enhance your humility and thus your approachability. And when you do speak, do so with an economy of words. Learn and practice the principle known as “Napoleon’s Corporal.” (Look it up!) Communicate with simplicity and precision so that virtually any follower will understand.  Then ask them what they think … And at the very least your periodic silence may reduce the probability of you saying something profoundly stupid!

                    The Second-First Rule

PREPARE YOUR SUCCESSOR!

 This does not mean that you get to choose and groom your successor! 

It means that all leaders have a sacred generational responsibility to prepare their followers to ascend through the ranks in an ethical, efficient and effective manner. A fundamental purpose of leadership is to grow “smart, thoughtful and reflective leaders”for the future. Follower behaviors evolve into leader behaviors through the processes of modeling, training, educating, delegating, empowering and trust. Each of these processes must be aligned in policy and practice. Trust is predicate to all dimensions of organizational leadership and is especially so with new personnel and new promotions.  Evolving leaders will thrive in an organization that is not averse to reasonable risk. This is directly relevant to the development of decision-making skills among new leaders.  Avoidance of a risk-averse culture is foundational to the development of an organizational culture that encourages new ideas, tactics, strategies and direction.  Provide all supervisors with “toolboxes” stocked with relevant tools prior to assigning them increased authority or responsibility.  Prepare them for the inevitable “critical shift”!  Mentor and support them as they make their way. And gradually prepare yourself to transition out… Those you hire or promote near the end of your career will define your leadership.  Ensure that they are well-chosen, socialized, trained, and educated, for they will be a significant part of your professional legacy. And always, always reinforce success! It’s not all within your power, but do your best to leave the place better than you found it. Don’t let F Troop be your legacy!  

     The Third-First Rule

AVOID SYCOPHANTS AT ALL COSTS!

(AKA Ass Kissers)

 Sycophants are not your friends!  They are organizational, blood-sucking, disease-carrying ticks!  Like parasitic insects that will attach to you upon your ascension through the ranks, they will pat you on the back; agree with all you do and will generally make you look like a lame-ass clown.  Comprising your inner circle with sycophants is a symptom of a leader’s presumptive weakness.  Likewise, surrounding yourself with well-intended personnel who are just like you is at best a missed opportunity.  Although natural to trust those you can best relate to as a leader, you will likely do better by diversifying your inner circle.  The 16thPresident of the United States, Abraham Lincoln had the courage to surround himself with both allies and rivals. Doris Kearns Goodwin titled her book “A Team of Rivals”after Lincoln’s unique presidential cabinet.  The concept of a “team” comprised of “rivals” is seemingly oxymoronic.  And yet it worked well through some of the most challenging years in United States history. Lincoln staffed his cabinet with men who would challenge and debate his ideas, policies and strategies.  This is demonstrative of Lincoln’s confidence, character and emotional intelligence.  Yes there are risks in this strategy as the debate must conclude, decisions must be executed and the ultimate responsibility remains with the leader. The Harvard Business Review writes that “Again and again, Lincoln shared responsibility for others’ mistakes, and so people became very loyal to him.”In conclusion, consider surrounding yourself with a mix of those who are like you and those who are different, who think differently, who have reasonably contrary perspectives, experiences, knowledge that you may not and the courage to tell you what you need to hear.  And lastly: don’t be an ass kisser-it’s not leader like!

   The Fourth-First Rule

THE NO ASSHOLE RULE*

(Says it all)

 And yes, this includes you!  Don’t hire any, don’t retain any, don’t promote any, don’t tolerate any and don’t be one!  Sounds simple, right?  Look around … not so simple!  Getting the right people on the bus and in the right seats on the bus all while getting the wrong people off the bus can be a daunting challenge. This is especially so within agencies administered by “Civil Service.” It is likely that you inherited a bus that has been poorly maintained, inadequately staffed, damaged by corruption, nepotism and politics … but there will be many dedicated, passionate professionals on that bus waiting for a true leader to transcend the status quo. This is the very essence of a “Leadership Challenge”!  Stand up, embrace it, challenge the status quo and prevail!  Many will hide from such a challenge, but true leaders will have the courage to lead as “The credit belongs to the man in the arena; whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly…”(Theodore Roosevelt: Citizenship in a Republic”, April 1910.) As a leader you are in the fulcrum of all forces within the arena. It will get ugly-if you need a hug go home…leadership is a contact sport!

(*Title and concept borrowed from: The No Asshole Rule –Building a Civilized Workplace and Surviving One That Isn’tby Robert I. Sutton, PhD.  Business Plus 2010)

The Fifth–First Rule

EXTINCTION-AS IN JURASSIC PARK

(AKA: Know When To Go!)

 And yes, this means you!  If you begin to think and feel like a dinosaur and look like a fossil, it’s probably time to go.  You and only you will know when that time has come, but others will be sure to nudge you. Leave on your terms and when the time is right for your organization.  Nothing good comes from overstaying, not for you and not for your followers.  Put your ego aside and make an objective, altruistic decision. Leadership is stewardship, not ownership. Know when to let go! If you prepared yourself for this transition as you prepared your successor you will be ready!  (See: The Second-First Rule!)

The time to get out of the way will come naturally … do so with grace and dignity.  Go on your terms or you will inevitably go on the terms dictated by others.  As stewards, it is a leader’s responsibility to leave “the place” better than they found it. So, don’t turn it into Jurassic Park!  Go home…and Shut the F’…Up!

THE KANGAROO COURT FOR COPS

THE KANGAROO COURT FOR COPS
By: Officer Deon Joseph

When police shootings occur, (depending on the race of the officer and the person they encountered) often times those stories can get spun completely out of control. For months, I end up having to do several things that keep me from protecting the community I serve.

One of those things is to handle protest and get shouted at for something I was not involved in, that occurred in another part of the city, county or even crazier, in another part of the country. I can handle that. That doesn’t bother me. I work in the protest capital of the nation.

Another incredibly annoying thing I have done on and off duty is answer loaded questions from friends, foes and strangers as to why police officers “murder” people. Or here is a rich one. “Why we have a license to just kill people for no reason.” Or “How is it possible for cops to kill unarmed people?”

Fun fact, folks: There are people in prison for killing other human beings with their bare hands. It’s possible. Yes, unarmed people have tried to murder police.

The questions are usually asked in a way to guarantee a certain answer, or get under my skin so my anger can drive me to a desired answer. But I was born at night. Not last night. I always have an answer that they usually cannot refute without going into a temper tantrum or pre-prepared rant provided to them by some college professor or running off to a different subject to avoid the “L” as my sons say. Yet, to keep answering the same tedious questions over and over again is really getting old, but I do it anyway because if I don’t a social justice warrior will answer for me and they would more than likely be lying.

So in this article I’m taking it upon myself to share with you the importance of why our detractors have such a huge advantage over us in getting the truth to the public when shootings occur. I need you all to see why America as it relates to cops has become a kangaroo court.

When police shootings happen, the investigations can take anywhere from several months to a year depending on how complex it is. During this time, we are gathering witness and officer statements, waiting for autopsy reports, checking hours of body camera and closed circuit footage, waiting on forensics and a whole host of things to ensure that we have all the facts before we release conclusions.

Officers who work for the same department often get accused of being silent on a perceived injustice. I’m sure most wish to God they could talk about it to stop the slander machine or misinformation. Unfortunately, with most if not all departments not one employee working for the involved department is allowed to talk about the shooting until the case is resolved, whether they were involved or not and whether they feel it was a justified shooting or not. For officers not involved; their silence is not because they have something to hide, fear retaliation or because of some ominous/mysterious blue code of silence that for the most part is Hollywood BS.

The truth is this: We are in a litigious society; every officer on a department is a representative of their department no matter where they go. Hence the reason I still get asked today about the Rodney King beating, even though I wasn’t a police officer in ‘91. I was fuming about it like everyone else back then. Though we have no direct connection to that shooting, we are connected by uniform. Which means anything they say can be used as a sound bite that could harm the integrity of the investigation, which is not fair to the officer involved in the shooting or the person who was shot. The media and ambulance-chasing lawyers do not care if that officer was at his home watching a football game when the shooting occurred. All that matters is that he wears the same uniform and he or she gave them sound byte they needed to keep drama going for self-serving reasons.

In between time, our detractors who are masters of manipulation clearly understand that we cannot talk about it. They know this very well. And use this as an opportunity to try this case in the court of public opinion for months. Here are the groups and how they work folks.

LAWYERS

We can’t fault them. They are doing their jobs. And that job is to get people the highest payday possible so their own payday can be higher. Seeing so many settlements even when the officer was justified lets me know I am probably in the wrong profession. Their goal in our silence is to try the case in the court of public opinion. Bring grieving mothers and grandmothers center stage to pull at the heartstrings of the public. To find pictures of the person who was shot playing T-ball minus the gang tattoos on his face. They want to racialize the issue as quickly as possible using identity politics to rally people who identify with the victim’s family. The goal is to create a jury pool long before jury selection. They use trigger words like “injustice”, “racism”, “murder” repeatedly to paint the actions of the officers as so heinous, that no one would believe the truth even when it is finally revealed for hopes of a settlement and a new pair of Jimmy Choos or a yacht they have been dreaming of.

ANTI-POLICE ADVOCATES

Their job: Take it to social media. Take it to the streets to push their agenda. Their methods: lie, twist the truth, put captions on social media posts to guide the simple-minded to a thought. They exploit the person who was shot, who when they were alive they could care less about especially if they are not the right color to further their agenda. A life to them is only as valuable as the race or profession of the person who kills them. As they take their “outrage” to the public, they carefully craft their arguments for two groups of people. For the more intellectual folks, make their arguments so complexed using so many $10,000 words that even educated people begin to fall for. For those who lack a certain level of education or knowledge of the law, the strategy is to come up with catchy phrases that are easily digestible, designed to fire up folks who just don’t have the patience to just wait for the truth to come out.

In fact, their versions of the incident are purposely abbreviated to leave out details that may make sense. They engage in a tactic I like to call “jumping.” It is where they jump from A to Z claiming they recited the alphabet but left out the other 24 letters. For example:

When Mike Brown was shot, they repeated this mantra… “Mike Brown was murdered for being black and jaywalking.” Sure if you repeat it enough, everyone will believe it. But the truth is he was warned for jaywalking … twice. In response, he decided to assault a police officer and struggle over his gun which led to him being killed. But who cares about facts when there is a revolution going on?

But their favorite are people who are disenfranchised, who are intelligent, but are so frustrated and fed up with their condition that they can only see things from an emotional level. They are already primed and ready to engage in conflict based on said frustration. “Hands up! Don’t shoot!” was one of the most recent and famous ones to incite them. It was simple and took the thinking out of it for many people. And as we found out at the end of that investigation, the cliché did not match what actually occurred. By the time the truth came out, a city was burning and a nation was divided. At the click of a button numerous social justice warriors who believe in the “end justifies the means” approach, can guide a mass amount of people to a thought with carefully edited montages, or edited portions of a police shooting they want people to see to get them all fired up. They recognize better than anyone that we live in what I like to call a “microwave society.” I call it that because we are in an age where people want their information fast. It doesn’t matter if the nutrients are burned out. It doesn’t matter that it could give you cancer. They just want it. A conventional oven (methodical FACT gathering) won’t give it to you fast enough, so most will always go with and stay with the microwave (the fast, juicy version) no matter how bad it ends up being for them in the long term.

Unfortunately far too many people are being influenced by these groups, which are now made up of college professors, high school teachers, politicians and civil rights activists who are constantly seeking to grab 15 more minutes of fame. They show up, set the world on fire and then walk away waiting patiently for the next officer to have a human moment, as the communities they spun up are left to pick up the pieces. They literally cannot wait for another exploitable person to die at the hands of an officer who made a decision no officer wants to make in the heat of a dangerous moment.

THE MEDIA

I’m not saying all media is bad. I have met with many responsible and fair journalists over the years. I will not paint them all with a broad brush. It would not be fair. Yet I can say I have never seen it this bad. Objectively and balance has been almost completely sacrificed for ratings and sponsors.

I remember years ago when the police were involved in a shooting they would only share the limited facts that they had. Now we are seeing many reporters colorizing and racializing each shooting when it involves a white cop and a black male before reporting the facts. It is done to grab eyeballs. What’s even worse, some reporters are now social justice warriors masquerading as news anchors. And they use the incident to push an agenda they or their bosses support. They bring in social justice advocates to continue to paint with that broad brush that helps create the necessary tension to stretch the story for as long as possible, all the while knowing that the involved law enforcement agency can’t release all information for the reasons I stated. They continue to use tortured language to cast suspicion on every aspect of the shooting and the ensuing investigation. They thrive off speculation and innuendo to push the narrative as far as possible. They could be real heroes in keeping the peace by rejecting subjective reporting. But that won’t happen any time soon for some. Ratings equals $$$.

POLITICIANS

Once I gave a man in the political world a ride along. During the ride along, we had a frank discussion about the lack of support some politicians give to law enforcement during police shootings where the officers were clearly in the right. He looked at me and said “Joseph, most politicians know the vast majority of you all do a phenomenal job. We know in most cases those officers have to make a tough call they did not want to make. But some feel they have to allow you all to look like the bad guy to get the things their constituents want.” I respected the hell out of him for his honesty. But I was completely disheartened by what he said.

We have huge problems with our politicians refusing to stand by officers who were clearly defending themselves within the law. They are too afraid of the optics. Others who try to stay in office and pander to certain communities will completely throw police officers under the bus as we just saw in recent cases, and then back over the officer. They also sacrifice the truth for self-serving reasons.

Instead of leading, they put their fingers in the air to see which way the political winds are blowing, and are gone with the wind of lies, fear mongering and hysteria.

All of these groups go on a tear for months. Sometimes their work pays off when an officer who was righteously defending himself ends up having to stand trial, but gets acquitted because the facts show there was no criminal intent which is the main reason why they do not get convicted. Not because of their race. But in most cases, when the facts bear out, all the hype, the flawed reporting, the malicious rumors and lies, lose out to the facts, which sparks more staged outrage from all three groups that end up having disastrous consequences for police officers and the communities they serve. (See Dallas and the south side of Chicago).

Now please do not think that I believe we are infallible as police officers. I have reported misconduct as an officer. I also do not believe every police shooting that has captured the attention of this nation was justified.

The Walter Scott shooting was a clear case of murder in my opinion. The Oscar Grant shooting should not have happened. That officer had zero business with his firearm out. Eric Garner should still be alive. The Laquan McDonald case was clearly unjustified as well as a couple of others that I completely agree should not have happened.

Cases like those are pretty cut and dried. You do not have to be an expert to know those shootings should never have happened and are just as shocking to many of us as law enforcement officers as they are to you.

For the others, we all, cops and civilians alike, must stop allowing the aforementioned groups to manipulate you for self-serving reasons. We all must wait for all facts to come out before we rush to judgement against officers who were placed in a situation no police officer wants to ever be in. I have met with hundreds of officers. Not one has ever told me that they want to kill someone. Stop allowing these groups to drive a wedge between you and your police agency, because in the end, we all need each other.

When all facts have been gathered, if you still feel it was wrong, protest away, peacefully. I along with my fellow officers will even protect your right to do so. That is your right. All I ask is you stop reacting, and start thinking.

Five years since PO Darren Wilson did his job and an entire community was punished for it

Five years since PO Darren Wilson did his job and an entire community was punished for it
By Kirk Lawless

 It’s been five years since Michael Brown made the bad choices that led to his death. 
The media across the country weighed in on the shooting and so many were quick to condemn a police officer for doing his job. They ran with the “Hands up don’t shoot” mantra, which was proved to be a lie, but the damage was set in motion. And just as Nero played his fiddle while Rome burned, Ferguson too was to become a conflagration that only Shadrach, Meshach and Abednego would find comfortable.

There were others to blame for the “unrest,” later referred to as “The Ferguson Effect” (soft words really, used as justification for anarchy, rioting, looting, mayhem, and violence, lots of violence). Blood would be spilled in the name of “Justice” for a criminal who was killed by a police officer.

The media fanned the flames locally,  nationally and internationally. Then President Barack Obama weighed in on it before the facts were in. Attorney General Eric Holder weighed in on it before the facts were in also and elected to inject himself into the situation, coming to Ferguson, bringing a team of agents to ensure that “justice” was meted out.

The president didn’t get personally involved in the death of Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry, killed on 15 December 2010, by a criminal wielding an illegal weapon. That weapon, an AK-47 style rifle, was traced to Operation Fast and Furious under the supposed watching eye of AG Eric Holder. Holder, arguably, had direct knowledge of the operation that allowed illegal weapons to leave the United States only to be purchased by folks across the border and ultimately be used against American law enforcement officers.

In my opinion, when Holder came to Ferguson, he had the blood of Agent Brian Terry on his hands and it was still wet. He should have stayed in Washington and investigated and prosecuted himself.

Al Sharpton smelled money, cameras and microphones and decided to come as well, but savvy community folks ran him out of town almost as soon as he arrived.

Michael Brown was no Emmett Till. This was not 1955. This happened in 2014 and it was as close to Emmett Till as anybody was going to get. Unfortunately the narrative was not even close but it was close enough to get the party started and it got started quickly.

The notion was the police were the enemy; more precisely the “white” police were the enemy, the enemy of black folks. Non-white cops were just as bad, if not worse, labeled as race traitors and Uncle Toms. The narrative was that white cops were just “willy-nilly” shooting and killing unarmed black kids.

The media poured in and set up their circus tents. Professional agitators were bused in to do their dirt and they were good at it. Several blocks on two borders of Ferguson were made to look like the Gaza Strip sans RPGs.

While all of this was taking place, the Ferguson cops and cops from outlying agencies donned riot gear and descended on the area in an attempt to keep the peace. The agitators looked at it as though the cops were coming in to beat the asses of everyone on the streets. Not the case. Believe it or not, the police were there in force to ensure the folks’ right to protest was unhindered. You can protest all you want. It’s your right to protest. But as everyone saw, the right to protest turned into mayhem and provided an opportunity to loot and burn, and assault the police officers (and anyone else who presented themselves to be a worthy target).

The media referred to it as “acting out,” citing the frustration of a portion of the protesters who could only show their frustration for the “injustice” by stealing hair products, tennis shoes, cash registers and car rims. Soon, they had stolen what they could from local convenience stores, including the one where Michael Brown started making his bad choices. When there was nothing left to steal, the buildings were set on fire.

So, “Black Lives Matter.” I understand that. I believe that. As a long-time police officer from that area, I believe that all lives are precious and matter. Hell, I signed up to make sure I could protect those lives, no matter what race they were.

I question the BLM folks who chanted their motto incessantly while setting fire to a convenience store where a young black man was working and who barely escaped being burned to death after his store was torched and he was trapped in a back room.

Just this past week, more than a dozen young black children were murdered, shot to death for no reason. Pretty sure their lives mattered. They mattered to me. They mattered to the cops who tried to save them and the cops who had to tell the parents that their babies were dead. So “Black Lives Matter” what do you do now? These children were gunned downed in their own neighborhoods and they weren’t marked for execution by the police. The cops weren’t pulling the triggers. Where are the protests for these murders?

How about “Hands up, don’t shoot” because I’m a little kid riding my bike down the street and having fun before school starts, or “Hands up, don’t shoot” because I am in my bed doing my homework. “Hands up, don’t shoot,” because I’m a little old grandma sitting on my front porch on a summer evening, not bothering anybody. “Hands up, don’t shoot,” because we’re senior citizens on our way to church and don’t kill us because you want to steal our car. You can have the car, but you’re going to kill us anyway? “Hands up, don’t shoot,” because you have the gun and are the predator, and I’m the prey, and we have the same skin color, and why exactly are you doing this to me, or anyone for that matter?

So, with Ferguson in flames in 2014, the BLM folks, The “New Black Panther Party” and a host of community “activists” marched arm-in-arm with a Missouri Highway Patrol captain, as what, a sign of solidarity? Just because you put the word “New” in front of a hate group, it doesn’t make them less of a hate group.

Had Chief Tom Jackson marched arm- in-arm with a group of Klansmen or neo-Nazis, the flames we saw during the “unrest” would have looked like a Girl Scout campfire compared to the inferno such an act would have ignited.

And while the peaceful protesters exercised their right to protest under the watchful eyes of the police, the agitators and criminals took pot shots at the police from behind a wall of peaceful protesters, and lots of women and children.

An officer from another agency sent to provide support was shot in the face by a coward who fired on the police line while using women and children as his shield. That’s what is known as a coward. This young officer nearly died and eventually lost his job as a result of his injuries so, “Hands up, don’t shoot” because I’m out here to protect the peaceful protesters, because it’s their right to protest.

Another officer from SLMPD with whom I attended the police academy got hit in the head by a 16-ounce bottle of frozen water thrown by another coward from a third-floor window, leaving him blind in one eye and having to rehab for several months while convalescing from a TBI and learning how to walk and talk again so, “Hands up, don’t hit me in the head with a one-pound projectile, damn near killing me.”

While fending off a group of “protesters” and severely outnumbered at a local gas station, one of my former partners was injured when one of the cowards threw an explosive device at him. Had it not been so primitive, he could have lost his leg or been killed, so “Hands up, don’t throw bombs at me while I’m protecting someone’s property from theft and vandalism.”

Meanwhile on this five-year anniversary, the St Louis Post-Dispatch ran the front-page headline “A Time To Remember,” the top story was devoted to Michael Brown. Five years later and the media still portrays him as a victim, the person ultimately responsible for his own death. 

On her official Twitter page, Elizabeth Warren posted, “5 years ago Michael Brown was murdered by a white police officer in Ferguson, Missouri. Michael was unarmed yet he was shot 6 times. I stand with activists and organizers who continue the fight for justice for Michael. We must confront systematic racism and police violence head on.” 

(Apparently she, like many others, choose to ignore factual data and would like to violate the rule of law by attempting to refile a case, already adjudicated)

Later the same week, while on the road traveling through Memphis, Tennessee, on a nameless street corner, I saw one of Louis Farrakhan’s boys hawking copies of the Nation of Islam newspaper “Final Call.” The headline was “White Terror.” I tried to flag him over to get a copy, but I guess he didn’t hear me, or maybe he assumed I was part of the “White Terror?”
Is it just me, or are folks spoiling for a race war based on a lie, and the first targets will be the cops on the front line? 

HELP IS CLOSER THAN YOU THINK

Help Is Closer Than You Think
By Chris Amos

As I sit down to type this article, nine members of the NYPD have committed suicide, seven of which have occurred in the last three months. Just a few weeks ago, NYPD officers were doused with water and one struck by a plastic bucket that had been thrown at him. An ICE office in Florida was the site of protesters threatening agents, contractors and their families. The next day an ICE office in San Antonio was targeted by gunfire. The following day, Philadelphia police officers were praised by some and taunted by others in a crowd while confronting an active shooter who had shot six of their colleagues. All six “miraculously” survived according to Philadelphia’s Police Commissioner Richard Ross Jr. And we wonder why it is so difficult to find qualified applicants.

Departments across the country are in various stages of addressing the mental toll being taken on police officers and for good reason. A handful of states are addressing PTSD as a recognizable disability, warranting early retirement by those first responders diagnosed with it. Departments, both big and small, are turning to peer counselors and critical incident stress management teams. I am the Director of one such team in a Sheriff’s Office in Virginia. These are all long overdue and much-needed steps being taken across the country. Departments and agencies are recognizing that having your name, address, and the school your children attend shouted out by some knucklehead over a bullhorn can take its toll on an officer mentally and emotionally, it also takes a toll on an officer’s soul!

Friend, can I share with you, some for perhaps the very first time, 3 biblical truths concerning you and the work you do as a law enforcement officer. Truths that if embraced can provide a healing balm for the soul.

1. Your work is important to God. In fact, your work is a calling by God. The Apostle Paul says as much in the book of Romans, chapter 13, verses 1-5. 

Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God. 2 Therefore whoever resists the authority resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will [a]bring judgment on themselves. 3 For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to evil. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. 4 For he is God’s minister to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God’s minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.

Long before you were the Thin Blue Line, you were the God-ordained hedge of protection between peace and total chaos, light and darkness, righteousness and evil.

2. Though true Christians are not as vocal and in your face as so many protestors, cop-haters, and special interest groups please know that you are being lifted up in prayer by men, women, teens and even children you do not know and will never meet, at least on this side of eternity.

 “I exhort therefore, that, first of all, supplications, prayers, intercessions, and giving of thanks, be made for all men; For kings, and for all that are in authority; that we may lead a quiet and peaceable life in all godliness and honesty” 1 Timothy 2:1-2.

3. THERE IS HOPE!

Thirty years ago as a young 24-year-old cop, suffering from a 14-year addiction, I sat at the end of my bed, my city-issued revolver pressed against the side of my head. Having lost the hope, desire, and will to live I assumed, wrongly, that my wife and newborn son would be better off with me out of the picture. I watched my reflection in a mirror as I slowly began to squeeze the trigger. Within a fraction of an inch, literally, from death I heard a voice as audible as that of your partner or spouse say, “There is hope.” I put the gun down. Three months later I found the source, the author and very essence of hope, Jesus Christ. My life was completely transformed! 
If you are in a dark place, I shout with every fiber of my body, “There is hope!” Reach out to God. Ask Him to reveal Himself to you, if He is truly there. Crack open a Bible and read the Gospel of John. If Jesus is who I say He is He will make Himself known to you. And for your sake and that of your family, friends, and coworkers, please, please, please, put the gun down! Help, my friend, is closer than you think.  

WHAT DO PROFESSORS REALLY TEACH ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT?... THEY’RE NOT GOOD, THEY’RE RACIST.

WHAT DO PROFESSORS REALLY TEACH ABOUT LAW ENFORCEMENT?... THEY’RE NOT GOOD, THEY’RE RACIST.

By: DANIEL HAGOPIAN 

“They’re racist!” “They abuse their power!” “They are killing black people and black kids at alarming rates!” “They unfairly lock up minorities and put them in jail!” “They pull over black people for no reason!” If you have listened to any left-wing media or have listened to anyone from the left discuss this topic, you have most likely been met with these absurd claims; however in the university setting it is no different. In fact, it is much worse. This does not mean all professors hate or bad-mouth cops in the classroom. This is based on personal experiences as a third-year college student. UC Davis English professor Joshua Clover: “People think that cops need to be reformed. They need to be killed.”

What do professors really say?

            This pertains to a lot of sociology-oriented courses or any course relating to social issues and/or race. Professors will bring up instances the media has covered on the news without context: Michael Brown, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, the Starbucks Scandal… and put all the blame on the cops. Professors love, just like the media, to cover racial incidents without waiting and listening to all the facts. Professors will use emotion to justify their stance and will attack you on your morality and character as a student and as a person for not agreeing with their “professional opinion.” But that is the problem; it is just their opinion with no facts to back up their claims. They will try to make you as uncomfortable as possible and they will make the class despise you and convince them that you are wrong because you are being immoral, disrespectful, (to even challenge/debate their opinions) corrupt, and just looking to start a fight. The professor will make the other students in the class look at you differently and devalue your opinion. 

The problem

            Brainwashing students to believe that law enforcement cannot be trusted and that they are always racist and abusive with their power is like raising a whole generation set up for failure; cops will not be seen as a source of safety and trust and they will always be working in this environment of hatred which not only puts them in more danger by those who target and kill cops because of what the news says, but they will be less likely to work their jobs as efficiently as if they were treated with support and respect. 

The facts 

            Most professors will use these incidents to claim that the police are terrible, racist human beings who abuse power. No one is denying that racism does not exist within law enforcement, or any profession for that matter. This is clear in certain incidents, like the Walter Scott shooting where the shooting and the officer’s actions were clearly not justified. However, to claim and constantly push this agenda of “every racial incident between a cop and minority is racist,” is not only an unfair generalization, but a dangerous tactic used by the left-wing media for views that further divide the necessary relationship citizens need with law enforcement to ensure a safe, peaceful and more trusting society. 

What can you do as a student? 

You can start off by stating the facts and backing up your opinions on cases with them. Just make sure you cite your findings and provide proof. Professors and even your classmates may approach you with hate and confusion. They may label you as someone who is immoral, hateful, racist, prejudiced or whatever they can come up with to attack your morality. However, this is no reason to give up on logic and to give up on standing for officers and law enforcement who deserve praise in what they do, especially if they are mislabeled and some ignorant person is bad-mouthing them. 

What happens frequently is that professors will point to their credentials and say, “well I have a PhD in sociology from [any university], so I know what I am talking about.” This is a logical fallacy called “Argument from Authority” in which “ a claimed authority’s support is used as evidence for an argument’s conclusion.” Professors can flaunt their degrees all they want, but it does not mean they are always right about an incident and you are always wrong as a student. Facts are facts and reality is reality regardless of what degree you have after your name, especially when it comes to forensics reports, autopsies, or videos that prove the innocence of a cop. If you are met with unfair grading and/or treatment in the classroom, universities have grade appeals in which you appeal for a grade change to the dean based on unfair treatment. When you give examples and instances of unfair treatment, then the dean or whoever is in charge has the authority to change your grade for the better. 

Remember, you have as much a right to an opinion as any one of your classmates and even professors, especially when your opinion is backed by irrefutable proof!

PROTECT YOURSELF FROM WIRE FRAUD DURING A HOME PURCHASING CLOSING

We have all seen that scary disclaimer on the bottom of email signatures… WIRE FRAUD IS ON THE RISE. PROTECT YOUR FUNDS. This is the unfortunate reality of a very real and widespread scam that is snagging more and more victims. So this brings up the question “What can I do to keep my money safe when purchasing a home?” During a closing, you cannot bring a check and nobody wants to be put in the position of being a victim of wire fraud. 

Safety Tip #1

Always make sure you are working with a reputable title company. This is where having a top-notch agent comes into play. An experienced agent will have a great working relationship with several title companies and can likely also get referrals from some veteran brokers in their office if need be. Lenders suggest visiting the title company in person, as a buyer you can offer to take your earnest money deposit yourself. At that time you can pick up a hard copy of your wire instructions to keep on file and refer to. Before you order the wire for your closing, you can also call the title company and have them recite the routing/account numbers to you with the copy of the instructions you picked up in front of you. Nothing should have changed.

Safety Tip #2

It is likely that you are purchasing outside of your local area, so another option is to ask your reputable title company to overnight you the wire instructions. Make sure you use a company that will let you track and require a signature upon receipt. When you receive the wire instructions, call to confirm what you have received and after that you should be safe to wire at closing! 

Safety Tip #3

You can never be too careful! Always follow your gut, check, double check and even triple check until you feel safe. Phones are not likely going to be used in a wire fraud scam, so pick up and dial your title company, get instructions directly from the source and discuss your concerns with them. You can always go to your bank in person to order the wire transfer rather than sending an email. Secure overnight delivery services like FedEx, UPS or DHL can also deliver instructions. The bottom line is criminals are out there, and they are looking to take advantage of a vulnerable situation, so privacy and accuracy is always best when having to wire transfer for the closing of a home purchase.  

REMEMBRANCE - TROOPER MOISES SANCHEZ

ARTICLE & ARTWORK BY JONNY CASTRO

It was to be Trooper Moises Sanchez's final surgery from being shot in the line of duty back in April. Trooper Sanchez was shot in the head and shoulder after responding to a traffic accident where the driver fled the scene. After a foot pursuit, the Trooper attempted to take the fleeing driver into custody when he was gunned down. For nearly five months after the shooting, his condition seemed to be improving. Sadly, Moises suffered severe complications following the last of many surgeries related to his gunshot wounds and he has passed away. Trooper Moises Sanchez had proudly served the Texas Department of Public Safety since 2015. Prior to his time as a State Trooper, he served his country in the United States Marine Corps until military retirement. He leaves behind a wife and three children. Moises had just celebrated his 49th birthday.

Cover Story - Blue Magazine Advisor and Contributing Writer Win the Fight for Justice

Blue Magazine Advisor and Contributing Writer Win the Fight for Justice
#FreeEddie

Imagine if former New York City Police Commissioner and Blue Magazine Advisor Bernard Kerik had not flown to San Diego to assist the Gallagher family for the seven grueling weeks leading up to the trial. Imagine if Commissioner Kerik had not recommended assembling the legal dream team consisting of powerhouse attorneys Timothy Parlatore and Marc Mukasey. Imagine if we as Americans had allowed a slanted and malicious prosecution to jail Chief Eddie Gallagher, 39, for the rest of his life. Had Commissioner Kerik not intervened, that's where we were headed.

Gallagher, a trained medic, sniper and explosives expert had spent 19 years of his life fighting terrorists on their soil so we could be safe here at home.  He had eight overseas deployments, including service in both the Iraq War and the War in Afghanistan. Gallagher was recognized for valor several times, including two Bronze Stars. He's also a loving husband and father of three children. He's a hero whose many sacrifices have successfully battled the war on terror.

For Commissioner Kerik, the fight for justice for Gallagher was personal. "I've followed the Gallagher case for months before I got involved," Kerik said. "It was horrible the injustice, the maltreatment, the disrespect to Gallagher's wife, his parents, and his children. After all Eddie had done for our country to see him maltreated was where I drew the line."

Many people had forgotten why Gallagher and others like him were overseas fighting terrorists. When Gallagher was arrested on Sept. 11, 2018, at gunpoint, which included holding his family at gunpoint, the media had appeared disinterested. Disgraceful. However, not all people have short memories. Many of us will never forget that horrific day on Sept. 11, 2001, when terrorists attacked our country and killed nearly 3,000 Americans.

"As the person responsible for overseeing the rescue, recovery, investigation of the World Trade Center. Somebody who lost twenty-three of my own officers on September 11, 2001, I remember when Pres. George Bush came to Ground Zero on Sept. 14th, and he told me the people who did this—the people who attacked the Towers—the people who attacked America— they were going be held accountable for what happened," Kerik said. "And you know what we did? We sent people like Chief Gallagher into the Middle East to kill the terrorists. We sent them to the Middle East to take out the people who attacked our city."

That's why Kerik got involved.

"When I heard this story, I thought it was outrageous. We can't go after the men and women who do the job that has to be done. Monday morning quarterbacking, what they should've, would've done. No. Let them do their job," Kerik said. "Eddie Gallagher did his job. He's a hero in the eyes of every American that's following this case, and I couldn't be happier than I am with Tim Parlatore and Marc Mukasey for a job well done."

We too at Blue Magazine are proud of the job Parlatore—a Blue Magazine contributing writer, and Marc Mukasey did in the name of justice. Parlatore and Mukasey are tremendously busy attorneys who dropped everything and flew out to California to fight for justice. They remember the attack on 9/11—they know the honorable work our men and women in the military do every day to keep us safe. Railroading our heroes for crimes they did not commit is about as insulting as it gets. This is not how we treat our veterans. This is not how we, as Americans, thank them for their sacrifices and dedication.

Even President Trump—an ardent supporter of our military and law enforcement community—stepped in and helped Gallagher after reports of his harsh treatment while in confinement became public. On March 30, Pres. Trump ordered Gallagher transferred to "less restrictive confinement," marking the second time in history a U.S. president had intervened in a prisons conditions matter. Pres. Nixon did it in 1971 when he ordered Lt. William Calley moved from a military brig to house arrest.

On July 2, 2019 the jury acquitted Gallagher on six charges and found him guilty on the seventh charge of "wrongful pos[ing] for an unofficial picture with a human casualty. Since the maximum sentence for that charge was four months, and Gallagher had already served more time in jail than the sentence, he was released.

Trump tweeted, "Congratulations to Navy Seal Eddie Gallagher, his wonderful wife Andrea, and his entire family. You have been through much together. Glad I could help!"

The Gallagher trial has exposed Americans to the inner workings of the malicious military prosecutions of our heroes. It has taught us we must continue to honor heroes like Gallagher, not turn our backs on them, jail them for life for whatever political expediency or other unjust reasons. We see this all the time in the law enforcement community where good officers are collateral damage of pandering politicians or spineless law enforcement leaders who don't have the mettle to stand up and fight for justice.

On that horrific day of Sept. 11, 2001, the terrorists attacked and killed so many of us, and have thus far been destroyed by heroes like Gallagher, who've never forgotten what's at stake. All of us at Blue Magazine commend Chief Gallagher and appreciate the work Kerik, Parlatore and Mukasey did in the name of justice. It's refreshing to know there are still great men out there who never forget 9/11 and remember the cost in blood and lives. Job well done.

George Beck is a police sergeant, award-winning journalist, and managing editor of Blue Magazine. He holds a Ph.D. in History & Culture from Drew University. He is the author of The Killer Among Us and several other books.

Why ‘Black Lives’ & ‘Blue Lives’ should matter to all of us

Why ‘Black Lives’ & ‘Blue Lives’ should matter to all of us
By Robert Foreman

The volatile mixture of race and incidents of police brutality has long been a subject of contention in America. Many people have their own entrenched views on the matter and will not be swayed either way. Most African-Americans see the issue of police brutality as an ongoing threat to our community. On the other hand, there are many in law enforcement who believe that there is an ongoing bias against members of their profession who are just doing their jobs. The growing tensions have resulted in the birth of two movements; “Black Lives Matter” and “Blue Lives Matter.” Each of these movements has inspired both support and controversy among the public and lawmakers.

The ‘Black Lives Matter’ movement was born following the acquittal of George Zimmerman for the shooting death of Trayvon Martin in 2012. Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer, shot and killed Martin, who was 17, during an altercation. Other high-profile incidents involving unarmed African-Americans who were killed during encounters with police officers continued to galvanize the movement. Some view Black Lives Matter as shining a light on issues of police misconduct. Others have branded Black Lives Matter as racist and have countered with “all lives matter.”

I’ve lost count of how many times I have had to debate with people regarding Black Lives Matter. What I try to explain to them is that if one black person kills another black person under circumstances that aren’t self-defense, then that black person who did the killing is likely going to jail for murder or manslaughter. On the other hand, if a rogue officer, or non-black citizen like Zimmerman, kills a black person under circumstances that aren’t self-defense, then they likely aren’t going to go to jail for murder or manslaughter. So, Black Lives Matter isn’t claiming that black lives matter more than any other racial group. It’s stating that black lives should matter just as much as everyone else’s under the eyes of the justice system.

The Blue Lives Matter movement was born in 2014 following the deaths of Officer Rafael Ramos and Officer Wenjian Liu. Both on-duty NYPD officers were shot and killed by Ismaaiyl Abdullah Brinsley. The shootings were Brinkley’s revenge for the deaths of Eric Garner and Michael Brown, who were both killed during encounters with the police. Blue Lives Matter grew out of the frustration that some in law enforcement saw as a bias toward law enforcement and was a response to Black Lives Matter. The advocates of Blue Lives Matter firmly believe that the killing of a law enforcement officer should fall under the hate crime statutes once a prosecution and conviction have occurred. Only one state, Louisiana, has made it a hate crime to target law enforcement personnel, EMTs and firefighters. The Louisiana law has been met with controversy by those who believe that someone’s job occupation should not get the same hate crime protections as race and gender.

I have friends who are both current and former law enforcement and I’ve always found them to be dedicated to the oath they swore to “protect and serve.” They would express their frustration to me about being branded a racist when they had a legitimate reason to stop or detain someone of color. However, some of them understood that there were incidents where some of their brethren did cross a line, yet they understandably did not want to be lumped in with the actions of others.

Ironically, both African-Americans and law enforcement personnel find themselves in similar predicaments. Each is unfairly judged by the actions of a few. Law-abiding African-Americans complain that they find themselves being treated as criminals by some members of law enforcement simply because of other African-Americans who do commit criminal acts. Many law enforcement personnel complain that they are being branded as racists by the African-American community, and the media, simply because of the actions of some of their brothers and sisters in blue who have acted in an unprofessional manner in high-profile incidents.

In the end, people should be judged by their own actions and not by the actions of those who have the same skin color or wear the same uniform. No race or profession should be unfairly painted with a broad brush as being either all good or all bad. Unfortunately, we live in a society where many people find it easier play the blame game instead of trying to have open and honest discussions about the issues at hand. Both the Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter movements have given some people a real opportunity to discuss the issues, while other people have used both movements as a way to create more division and animosity to suit their agenda.

Regardless of how people choose to view Black Lives Matter and Blue Lives Matter, one thing is crystal clear. All lives do matter, whether they are black, white, brown, yellow or make their living in law enforcement. There should be no debate over which life matters more. Now, that’s no politically correct bumper sticker or social media hashtag. It’s just a statement of fact. Because once we start trying to decide which life has more value based on race or profession, we begin to lose sight of our common humanity. Once we go down that road the only destination is our own destruction, and in that outcome everybody loses.

Legally Achieving the American Dream: Now Campaigning for Mayor

Legally Achieving the American Dream: Now Campaigning for Mayor
By Valerie Stetz

Arvin Amatorio, Esq.  was born to Librado and Sonia Amatorio in the northern section of the Philippines, along with his five siblings. Both of his parents were school teachers and his mother was also involved with politics. Education, their Catholic religion, and community service were very important to the Amatorio family. All through grammar school, Arvin aspired to be a Catholic priest. It was during high school where he became interested in law. Arvin went to college in Manila and then attended the College of Law at San Sebastian where he earned his law degree. His girlfriend Ilya was also educating herself and received her nursing degree. She traveled to NYC to work on several projects. In 2002 she asked Arvin to accompany her several times, which he eventually did. Ilya felt a connection to NYC and wanted to stay when she was offered gainful employment. Ilya works as a nurse administrator at Mount Sinai Hospital in NYC.

Ilya discussed her plans with her Arvin and was determined to stay with or without him. Both of their entire families were living in the Philippines and Arvin had to choose his career in the Philippines or starting over with his love in the United States. He made a great choice and began looking into obtaining a green card and gainful employment. He became an adjunct professor in one of Manhattan’s private colleges, all while studying for the Bar exam in NYC. Arvin and Ilya eventually married and were both employed in NYC when they were having their first-born son and they wanted to achieve another American dream of becoming homeowners.

They purchased their first home in Bergenfield N.J., which was affordable for them. Arvin passed the Bar exam on his first attempt. He worked for a few firms and eventually started his own successful practice based in NYC, where he found his passion for immigration law. Arvin has been representing clients for over thirteen years, with matters before US Immigration Offices and US Immigration Courts Nationwide. His passion is helping others fulfill their dream to stay and live in the United States legally.

Arvin felt a strong connection to his new-found home, Bergenfield, NJ, where Filipinos are the largest ethnic group and he developed relationships within the community. He was asked to run for Councilman of Bergenfield by his peers, which he has been very successful at while serving the people as a two term Councilman and Council President. He has been the chairman of the finance committee for the past four years that delivered 0% municipal tax increase for two consecutive years amidst the rising cost of government in the State and in the Country.

Additionally, he is on the police and DPW committees. Being elected to the Council is one of the highest honors and privileges of his life. As an immigrant, he was entrusted with public office and he is taking this as a sacred obligation, which leads to his announcement to run for Mayor in November, alongside Council members Kornbluth and Deauna. If victorious in November, Amatorio will become New Jersey’s second elected Filipino mayor. Amatorio states, “I would like to bring Bergenfield to a different level. I know I can do more for the town and excel.” Arvin spearheaded disabled veteran tax exemption to make sure our returning veterans and surviving spouses have property tax relief. Arvin has the upmost respect for the military and first responders. Other accomplishments include reduction of borough debt of more than four million dollars and lowered tax increases by more than 50%.

As if law and politics were not enough, Arvin serves as the CEO of Pro Health Consulting LLC. and Apex Health Care. Pro Health engages in managing medical facilities, with concierges’ service to first responders, educators, local, county, state, and federal employees and their families. Apex is a professional medical staffing company. Despite his busy schedule, family always takes first priority. He loves spending quality time with his two sons and wife as he instills in his two boys the importance of love of God, family and country.

THE REAL YOU

THE REAL YOU
By: Anthony Mikatarian

We as human beings are blessed to be social souls. Without this prominent trait we possess, we as a human race would not fully flourish. The sense of belonging to a societal group is natural, as long as it doesn’t damage your own true identity.  Unfortunately, though, you will constantly be challenged by peer pressure, as well as other external and even your own internal forces, to stay on your true identity’s path. There is no one out there that I have encountered who hasn’t found themselves at a crossroads in questioning and figuring out their true and purposed identity.

The constant undertow of socially belonging leaves you constantly challenged on staying afloat in your identity. When self-doubt, questioning, opinions and/or overwhelming peer pressure kicks in, this is when the undertow is at its strongest, leaving you vulnerable to drowning in it if you’re not careful. This can leave you in the desperate and misguided position of wrongfully conforming in order to survive, leaving your pure self and identity behind.  Hence, you find yourself lost in a world to strictly please others while leaving your own beliefs and values behind. You become a conscious (and at times a subconscious) replica of what they expect you to be and not what you were truly meant to be. It is a difficult task to overcome this because of responsibilities to loved ones and survival.

In being a seasoned officer, family member, friendship holder, student, multi-business professional and finely aged human being, I have learned that in all aspects of your life the tug of peer pressure approval is at its most powerful when your own identity is at its weakest.

In all types of the social relationships that you have, from the most unsavory to the ones you love dearly, they all constantly affect how you need to be, act and live. Some are good-hearted attempts, some are given with bad attentions and some are just given without real thought. Nobody really knows what is best for you because nobody really knows the authentic you. Does anybody really offer 100 % of themselves?

The good, bad and ugly advice someone offers is only as good as what you reveal to them about yourself. From people with the worst intentions to the ones with the purest intentions, they lay on peer pressure and their opinions as to what is offered to them by you. They are also influenced by their own beliefs and agendas to try and transform you. More likely than not, their offerings are tainted with the giver’s interpretation of what the real you should be.  You also have to decipher if they are genuine, jealous, evil, self-serving or uninterested offerings.

A way to combat this is to find and familiarize yourself with people who do not totally and blindly follow a flock. These people live their lives flying at times against the flock. You can learn from these people, who forge through the negative forces to live the way they were meant to live. These authentic people live life on their own terms and belief system. Remember that people’s opinions are only that! An opinion is a view or judgement formed, which is not necessarily based on fact or knowledge. Simply put, the only person who knows the real you is YOU. Have the aptitude to embrace your own instincts. Always listen, but void out the unnecessary and self-serving peer pressure and opinionated noises. And most of all, believe in your judgement on what road to follow in finding the real you! As always, God bless and stay safe!

THE DRUG CRISIS - Making a Difference: One Life at a Time

THE DRUG CRISIS
Making a Difference: One Life at a Time
By: Joel E. Gordon

“We as a community came together and broke down the silos, rolled up our sleeves and did what was necessary to move us forward.” – Jan Rader

West Virginia’s first female fire chief, Huntington’s Jan Rader, is making a big impact on the fight against the drug and opioid epidemic. In 2017, Cabell County, West Virginia, the county in which Huntington resides, with a population of 95,000, had 1,831 overdoses and 183 overdose deaths.

"This epidemic is far from over, but each and every one of us has a part to play in this epidemic. Just by listening and being kind to somebody, you have the ability to make a dent, a difference in their lives," Rader said in her TED Talk, which was filmed in November 2018 and has gotten over one million views so far.

In her TED Talk, she tells how she has been a firefighter for 24 years and in 2008, she earned her Associate Degree in Nursing after it became clear to her that the next big threat was not a “one and done emergency where you can ride in like the cavalry” but the deadly problem of drug and opioid addiction. Rader contends that first responders have had to redefine their job to be less like the cavalry and do more to save a life by helping to rebuild that life. "Somebody suffering from substance use disorder or addiction is actually a fragile person," Rader said that what they are dealing with is a brain disorder that changes the way a person thinks and convinces them they don’t have a problem. "They are hopeless, and the way we treat them can make their situation better or worse. … So we need to treat them with kindness and compassion and show them that they are a good person and that they do deserve to get better, because they can."

Due to Rader’s plan of action after a terrible year in 2017, new cases of hepatitis B and C are down 60 percent; overdoses in the community are down by 40 percent and overdose deaths are down 50 percent. Several new programs have contributed to these positive results.

• Harm Reduction Program. “The Harm Reduction Program has been instrumental in those numbers going down,” Rader noted. This program provided first responders with naloxone. The program also provides training and free naloxone for families and friends of those suffering from substance abuse disorder. “A lot of people in the community have had their lives saved not just by first responders, but also by friends and family,” Rader reported.

• Quick Response Team. Another community program is a grant-supported Quick Response Team (QRT). This program employs a team approach to visit, within 72 hours, those who have survived an overdose and to offer services. “The team is made up of a paramedic, someone from the recovery community, an undercover police officer and also someone from the faith community,” Rader explained. “We’ve found that has been extremely helpful.” About 30 percent of those contacted immediately accept help; the remainder continue to be regularly contacted by the team.

• Free-standing treatment facility. A third new solution is a free-standing treatment facility where people can be assessed and triaged. First responders can directly refer patients to this centrally located facility at the initial point of contact.

Besides helping community members deal with addiction issues, these new programs also help the caregivers. “First responders are so frustrated,” Rader observed. “We deal with the same people over and over, and then we find them dead. We’re built to help people. These new tools empower first responders to take action.”

Rader is committed to helping fire department members manage the stress and pressure they face, especially associated with the opioid crisis. This year, the city was awarded a Mayor’s Challenge Grant, which provided seed money to create a prototype program for firefighter wellness and self-care. The department has since been awarded a much larger Bloomberg grant to keep the program going for at least the next three years.

“This will be huge, because PTSD, compassion fatigue, mental health with first responders, these things are just as stigmatized as the opioid crisis,” Rader said. The program includes education, classes on strategies like mindfulness and yoga, massage and an embedded mental health counselor for the police and fire departments.

Rader's work fighting the opioid epidemic was featured in the Emmy-winning Netflix documentary, "Heroin(e)," and her work has been rewarded with a place on the 2018 Time 100 list of Most Influential People.

“This epidemic is far from over,” she cautioned “In Huntington, we are showing the rest of the country … that there is hope in this epidemic.”

To see Rader’s TED Talk go to: https://www.ted.com/talks/jan_rader_in_the_opioid_crisis_here_s_what_it_takes_to_save_a_life

Police Suicide: Breaking down the walls

Police Suicide: Breaking down the walls
By: Jim Ford, Ph.D.

Access to firearms, continuous exposure to human tragedy, shift work, social strain and marital difficulties, physical illness and alcohol are all contributing factors to why police officers commit suicide.

From the headlines, June 2019, two veteran police officers earlier this month from NYPD took their own lives within a 24-hour period.

Chicago Tribune, May 2019 – According to an 8-month study, six police officers have committed suicide. The administration of the Chicago PD are quite worried.

In the first four months of this year in France, French police officers committed suicide once every four days; a new report revealed 24 officers have taken their own lives. These statistics are staggering and mind-boggling.

There is a code of secrecy when it comes to mental illness in police agencies around the country and it’s a code that needs to be broken. According to Badge of Life, there is an average of 130 law enforcement suicides each year, or 11 per month. More officers die of suicide than from shootings and motor vehicle accidents combined. Police officers are eight times more likely to commit suicide than to be killed in a homicide and three times more likely to kill themselves than to die in job-related accidents (Villa, 2000). Badge of Life is a nonprofit organization and focuses on educational and training law enforcement in the area of mental health and suicide prevention.

We have to break down the wall that prevents us from admitting we have a problem and seek help before its too late. We have to take care of our brothers and sisters in blue. Don’t feel ashamed or embarrassed to ask for help. Make a call and see help NOW!

Dr. Jim Ford is a retired police lieutenant from Chatham Township. Currently,Professor, Chairperson and Director of the Criminal Justice Program at the College of Saint Elizabeth in Morristown, NJ jford@cse.edu

Proceed with Caution: New Jersey and Official Misconduct

Proceed with Caution: New Jersey and Official Misconduct
By Timothy Smith, Esq.

New Jersey has an embarrassing history of corruption among its political leaders.  We have seen state senators, assembly persons, big-city mayors and other officials go to jail for their corrupt activities.  As a consequence, the penalties that are mandated for the crime of official corruption are severe.  A person convicted of second-degree official misconduct will face a five-year parole-ineligibility period.  A person convicted of third-degree official misconduct will face a two-year parole-ineligibility period.  All official misconduct is of either the second or third degree.  

But these harsh punishments are required not just for corrupt high officials, who may wield enormous powers and do tremendous damage through their corrupt conduct.  Rather, the statute covers the conduct of any public employee, that is, any person employed by any government agency in New Jersey.  Even a public-school janitor, who may have no more official authority than deciding which classroom to mop up first, can be sent to jail for five years without the possibility of parole for a misdeed committed in connection with his or her job.  Of course, police officers are also public employees and are similarly vulnerable to the statute for their work-related misconduct.

No one can disagree that public officials who betray the public should face harsh treatment.  But the problem is that the official-misconduct statute is so broadly worded that its harsh sanctions are available for nearly any infraction, even a violation of a departmental rule, by an on-duty public employee.  Hence, in one case, a school teacher was indicted for second-degree official misconduct because he lied to his principal about why he had taken sick days.  The case was ultimately plea-bargained down to a lesser charge.  In another, a Board of Education clerk who took Board documents to use in her civil suit against the Board was found guilty of official misconduct because her removal of those documents violated the Board’s internal confidentiality policies. 

Police officers thus need to be aware that, subject to the charging discretion of the county prosecutor’s office, even minor disciplinary matters might result in an indictment for official misconduct. 

In addition, the Appellate Division has held that a police officer’s personal use of a police car and municipal telephone constitutes official misconduct.  In another case, where, admittedly, the officer deserves no sympathy, the Appellate Division held that a police officer who used the department’s telephone and internet service during business hours to further an illicit sexual relationship (with an underage girl) was guilty of official misconduct. 

The Appellate Division has also ruled that on-duty consensual sex constitutes official misconduct.  The court’s reasoning was that while an officer is engaged in such behavior, he is necessarily neglecting his official duties. 

It goes without saying that officers should not engage in misconduct of any sort regardless of whether that misconduct might also be indictable.Nonetheless, the severe, mandated penalties for acts of official misconduct and the statute’s nearly limitless reach (a reach that, in this writer’s view, is exceedingly unfair) constitute powerful incentives to keep on the straight and narrow.

Selecting the Right Candidate for Promotion

Selecting the Right Candidate for Promotion
By Christopher Scilingo

What happens when the wrong person gets a promotion and moves up into management?  It’s probably not that big of a deal. It happens all the time in both the public and private sectors.  The decision may ruffle some feathers and others who thought they were deserving of the new position may be upset for a time, but life will go on.  That wrong person for the job will soon learn to do the right job and step up to the plate and rise to the occasion, or they will continue to be the wrong person, but now in a position of management or leadership. However, what happens when there are multiple unqualified, incompetent outright "bad eggs" moving up the ladder? What happens when there is a culture of promoting employees based solely on their reciprocated relationships with those who are in power who make the decisions of who moves up the management hierarchy?  You see where I am going with this, don't you?  Apply this scenario to the law enforcement organization that you are a member of.  

This seems all too common in law enforcement organizations that are manipulated by elected officials and members of governing bodies. Greek philosopher Plato even touched on this subject around 380 B.C. in Book III of The Republic.  Plato warned that talented people must rise up the social hierarchy or else society may collapse, and he warned against the rise of those who lack talent but are related to those in power.  Can we apply Plato’s words to law enforcement organizations? Sure we can! If we adjust our point of view and change a few words, we can alter its application.  There is a correlation between poorly functioning law enforcement departments and the unqualified candidates who are chosen to move up in ranks.  The real blunder in this example is from those who are in power who outright choose a candidate to move up based on nothing more than the relationship that they share.  Can you foresee a departmental collapse or failure from this continued method? I can, but why can’t those in power see it? 

Those making promotion decisions must know that supervisors, managers and leaders are all integral positions that are required to operate an organization, especially paramilitary law enforcement organizations with rules, regulations, ranks and so on. Wouldn't those who are in power want to promote the right candidates for the positions so that those candidates will aid in the operation of an effective law enforcement organization? The goal should be to maintain an effective law enforcement organization that will, in turn, provide exceptional services to the people who make up communities, towns, and cities. They are an essential component to governing bodies.  Those governing bodies and others in power should be focused on providing people with the best services possible.  Sadly, this is seldom the case and we as law enforcement officers know all too well that politicians seem to want to benefit themselves before benefiting others.  So if a politician benefits themselves by returning a favor to a law enforcement officer that shares a relationship with them, let's say promotion in this case, but that law enforcement officer is neither qualified nor capable of the promotion, and this happens on a business as usual basis, who suffers? The law enforcement organization as a whole suffers, policing services suffer, and the people we're sworn to serve suffer.

Profound procedures need to be in place to sift through all the rank and file talents, experiences and inabilities.  No single promotional exam or review board can possibly pick the best candidate for promotion. These systems are in place to make the process appear fair.  However, law enforcement departments without some form of “testing” other than politicians appointing their friends will always suffer. In those cases, there needs to be in place a standardized method for selection to determine the better candidates for promotion. At least with a test, the most incompetent of the candidates will not pass or score well enough to qualify.  Although it may not be a foolproof method of selecting the right candidate, a test still separates candidates and holds them accountable to a standard for qualification.   It should never be acceptable to have those in power handing out promotions on a quid pro quo basis.  The very best should be promoted to serve our communities.

An Alternate Strategic Plan Format for Law Enforcement Agencies

An Alternate Strategic Plan Format for Law Enforcement Agencies
By Chief Rich Rosell

 Introduction

Today’s law enforcement executive faces complex challenges, both external and internal.  Years ago, a solid chief could plan his/her next fiscal year budget by copying the previous year’s budget and changing the dates, but not in today’s fast-paced world.

Strategic planning is not a new concept.  It has been used for decades, mostly in medium to large businesses.  Law enforcement executives have increasingly looked toward strategic planning to assist in creation of long-term goals.  Perhaps the most compelling reasons to plan strategically are, 1) allows (forces) an agency to look to the future and plan accordingly so they may be proactive in their LE initiatives, 2) puts the municipal or county governing bodies on notice that you need specific funding for specific reasons, 3) provides a mechanism for transparency, and 4) demonstrates to the rank and file that there is a plan behind the policies by which they are compelled to abide.

The internet is filled with countless formats for strategic planning.  Most, if not all, contain the absolute minimum needed to create a decent plan.  This article will take a different approach by recommending a format first introduced by the General Accounting Office (GAO) in 2004.  In a paper entitled “Combatting Terrorism: Evaluation of Selected Characteristics of National Strategies Related to Terrorism,” researched and written by former Undersecretary of Defense Randal Yim, he identified a set of characteristics which GAO recommended be present in any homeland security strategy.  These characteristics are ideal for a Law Enforcement Strategic Plan because they provide a much more detailed justification for much-needed budgetary items.  Those characteristics are:

(1) Purpose, scope, and methodology

(2) Problem definition and risk assessment

(3) Goals, subordinate objectives, activities and performance measures

(4) Resources, investments and risk management

(5) Organizational roles, responsibilities and coordination

Don’t get too wrapped up in the fact that Undersecretary Yim’s purpose was to improve homeland security strategies.  Read further in this article and you will understand why, in today’s operational tempo, it makes sense to use these characteristics as a template.

Purpose, Scope and Methodology

Any chief executive who has been around long enough has been bushwhacked by sharpshooting members of council who have yet to come to terms with the fact that the duties of a law enforcement officer are delineated by complex, well-researched policies and procedures.  By coming out strong stating why you need a strategic plan, to whom it applies, why, and how you came to develop such a comprehensive document, you are sure to get the attention of everyone in the room.  Three important parts of this (Purpose) paragraph are Mission, Vision and Values statements.  Mission tells the reader, in one or two sentences, the main focus of the agency: “The Mission of the Village of Rock Ridge Police Department is to provide professional and equitable service to its residents; properly funded and fiscally responsible.”   Be reasonable with your mission.  Don’t suggest something impossible, for example, “The Mission of the Village of Rock Ridge Police Department is to end all crime.”

The Vision Statement tells the reader what the leader envisions for his agency.  Don’t be afraid to be bold:  “The Vision of the Village of Rock Ridge Police Department is to become the leader in Community Policing in the State”.

The Values Statement shares with the reader the values of not only the agency, but those for whom it works: “Honor, Duty, Fidelity,” “To Protect and Serve.”

Scope will determine the reach of the document; who it affects. 

Methodology is as it implies; how did you happen to create such a masterpiece?  Don’t be afraid of being wordy.  List your references, key players, surveys, best practices, etc.

Problem Definition and Risk Assessment

We have been in a domestic battle to keep our citizens safe from terrorism for close to two decades.  Prior to 9/11, there were many problems with which law enforcement needed to be concerned.  Over the last 18 years, those problems have greatly increased every single year.  Here is your opportunity to tell the governing body, and the public who will read this strategy, what the problems are that require action and funding, and the bottom-line risk associated with these problems. 

While the Problem Definition should be self-evident, sometimes the Risk Assessment can be a bit tricky to verbalize.  Keep it simple by first describing the threat, then the vulnerabilities to the public and the agency.  Don’t list your threats and vulnerabilities without addressing how you (this plan) propose to mitigate them.

Goals, Subordinate Objectives, Activities and Performance Measures

These are the foundation of your strategic plan.  This is where you identify what you need in order to accomplish your mission up and above what would normally be presented in your budget.  Set out 4-7 important goals that are distinguishable from other items in your budget (such as paper clips, bullets and copy machines).  Then, identify 2-3 objectives designed to directly support each goal, followed by activities designed to meet those objectives. 

Use the SWOT analysis method for identifying your goals. SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats) is the industry standard for creating actionable goals for a strategic plan.  Follow the link on the footnote for an easy to understand, in-depth description of SWOT.

When linking your goals, objectives, and activities, use the SMART (specific, measurable, achievable, realistic, time-based) method. SMART can be applied to the goal, objective or activity, depending on where you need it.  Again, follow the footnote link for an easy to understand, in-depth description of SMART. And don’t try to do it by yourself.  Strategic Planning is a team sport!

Performance measures can be as simple as requiring division heads to report their progress weekly, surveys or statistics indicating that crime has been reduced.  It also provides transparency to council and the public.

Resources, Investments and Risk Management

The Resource paragraph is where you list the many resources, internal and external, available to you which will contribute to the success of your plan.  List your stakeholders and partners liberally. 

Investments represent the budget you require to meet your goals.  I suggest an attached spreadsheet in a line-item format.  Once you start meeting some of these objectives, you are going to see that many of the activities are not going to cost the town any money, for example you may find grants, or federal surplus items.  You still need to list them in the resources section, so council will see your sense of responsibility and good faith. 

Risk management can take many forms, for example, purchasing software to assist with predictive policing may require the storage of intelligence, which may be subject to the rules promulgated in 28 CRF part 23.  (Anything related to intelligence collection contains inherent intelligence purge concerns).  Purchasing software that facilitates the entry of application information online may require the purchase of new hardware, or costly maintenance agreements. 

Organizational Roles, Responsibilities and Coordination

Don’t take this section too lightly, as it will keep your document healthy and moving in the right direction.  If done correctly, your entire command staff will own a piece of this plan, so list each member’s roles in detail.

Assign the right people to run the applicable part of the plan, delineate responsibilities and give them a realistic time frame to meet your expectations. 

You must coordinate this plan at every level of your agency.  It will be worthless if it is not actionable at every level.  Conduct a tabletop in order to test the feasibility of key components of the plan. It would not be a bad idea to have a public workshop so that your residents become stakeholders.

Integration and Implementation

Your new Strategic Plan must be fully interoperable with all departmental policies and procedures, as well as other municipal documents.  We’ve all seen a “Town Manual” which was written 30 years ago and is completely irrelevant to our purposes, and we are obligated to follow some of the items contained within.  A few minutes of your time could make that obsolete Town Manual interoperable with most of your plan.  You can accomplish this task quickly and effectively by convening a panel whose goal is to deconflict the document. 

Once you have determined that your plan is actionable, your next step is to publish an implementation plan.  Don’t panic, for an implementation plan can be as concise as an operations instruction or policy detailing how and when each division will implement the plan.  One common misconception with Strategic Planning is that since the plan encompasses a period of roughly 3 years, that you cannot change its content.  Don’t be afraid to amend it as needed!  Consider it a living document.  When you meet a goal, improve upon that goal and republish the plan.  Keep it vibrant.  The worst thing a chief executive can do is to let a Strategic Plan die of natural causes. 

Conclusion

Strategic Planning is not a new concept; rather it has been a cornerstone for businesses for decades.Experience dictates politicians are more apt to agree to a well-articulated written plan than a verbal one.A detailed written strategy document, utilizing Undersecretary Yim’s template, provides the ultimate in transparency.This article simply recommends a new approach to creating a Strategic Plan.The internet is a valuable resource for more in-depth training.By utilizing the format proposed in this article as a template, you will provide a much more detailed proposal which will explain to the policy makers and public alike exactly what you need and why you need it.When policy makers have the optimum amount of information, they are more inclined to approve a request.This format provides a mechanism for you as the chief executive to provide that optimum amount of information to them.

The Execution of a Police Officer

The Execution of a Police Officer
By: Kirk Lawless

On June 23, 2019 North County Police Cooperative Police Officer Michael Langsdorf, as reported by The Officer Down Memorial Page, was shot and killed while responding to a check fraud at a local business.

Plenty about this sickens me, first the softness of the description of the horrific event.  “Shot and killed” so generic.  Lots of folks get shot and killed, on purpose, by accident, by self-destruction, but let’s call this what is was, an execution; a savage execution.  He didn’t just die, he did not “fall” in the line of duty, he wasn’t killed accidentally, he was murdered. He was stolen from us, assassinated, and when that happens to one of “us” what do we do about it? What do we say about it, and to whom do we say it?

Where I sit, writing this, there is a crucifix resting on the windowsill of my home office. On the top of the cross are a handful of black mourning bands that I have worn on my badge to police funerals; too many police funerals.

And that makes me sad, but really it pisses me off! I’m never been much on the bashful side, so I’m not about to start now.

I’m born and raised in St. Louis and it’s been my home for nearly my entire life.  As a police officer, I’ve stepped foot in, and put in work, in pretty much every jurisdiction in the St. Louis area and in the Metro East.  When a police officer is murdered, I take it personally.

I haven’t seen the surveillance footage from the market where Officer Langsdorf was assassinated but, long story short as told by his Chief of Police, Officer Langsdorf responded to a neighborhood market because a man was trying to pass a bogus check.  The video showed Officer Langsdorf leading the man into the store where the man tried to pass the check.  Once inside, a struggle ensued (probably as soon as the officer’s handcuffs came out).  During the struggle, there was a handgun visible in waistband of the soon-to-be murderer’s pants.  The two wrestled out of camera view until the killer produced the weapon and hit Officer Michael Langsdorf in the face and head several times (that sounds too soft as well for me), “pistol whipped” is what we call it.  It is certainly a violent act and it does, on occasion, cause death.  It is a brutal way to end a fight.

At this point, Officer Michael Langsdorf was certainly stunned and perhaps out of the fight.  It would have been the perfect time for the crook to take flight. He had that as a viable option.  Instead, the perpetrator stood directly over Langsdorf and fired one round from his handgun into his head/neck area as he lay facedown on the floor of a convenience store.  The bullet severed his spine and exited through his chest.  The Chief of the North County Police Cooperative described this, as he choked through his own tears, describing the assassination of one of our brothers, one of my brothers.

I will only mention the murderer’s name this one time, in the hopes his name will soon be forgotten when he is eventually erased from this earth. Bonette Kimbrelle Meeks, an ex-con from North Carolina, had just become a cop-killer.

Officer Michael Langsdorf was only 40 years old, had spent more than 17 years of his life as a police officer.  Now, his fiancé is without him and his children are without their father.  I will continue to use Officer Michael Langsdorf’s name, because I want you to remember it. 

The deed done, the assassin decided to flee the scene and he did.  The manhunt had begun.

When I first heard about the murder, someone sent me a Facebook link, wherein someone (doesn’t really matter who at this point) decided to live stream the aftermath on his or her Facebook page. I shouldn’t have watched the video, but I did.  I can add it to the memory bank of vile shit I should have never seen, but as a cop, I had.

And I can tell you; it really pissed me off!

Officer Michael Langsdorf was lying face down on the floor while a chaotic scene unfolded before my eyes.  I saw his life’s blood pooling from beneath him as a woman held his hand and tried to keep him still.  Another was yelling into Langsdorf’s radio for help, telling the dispatcher that an officer was down.  I could see his handcuffs on the ground near his body; one cuff opened, which told me he was probably trying to put the first cuff on when the attack began. (The application of the first cuff is the best time to launch such an attack, and convicts practice this shit in prison. Believe it!)  The killer knew exactly what he was doing.

Others ran around screaming, cursing the assassin, and just milling about.  I literally watched as Langsdorf bled to death and took his final breath.  The video ended shortly after backup units arrived and tried to help their brother, my brother.

A rage that has visited me many times over the past 35 years washed over me, setting me afire with hate and making me physically sick.

God knows how many other folks saw the video.  In this age of technology, the video probably hit every social media outlet within minutes.  Think of it, the final moments of a dying policeman. “If it bleeds, it leads,” right?

So, some heartless bastard at the only newspaper in St. Louis, The Post-Dispatch, gloms onto it and instead of just writing an article decides to post it on their Facebook page with a link to the video.

Enter: various police officers and law enforcement entities catch wind of it and contact Facebook, YouTube and the St. Louis Post-Dispatch and demand the removal of the link.  The response was not immediate. Meanwhile the footage continued to circulate.  Eventually the link was removed, but it was replaced with another story. 

Someone at the Post-Dispatch took affront to the negative comments and therefore searched the archives for the name of the deceased officer and found what they really wanted, an article replete with a photo of the officer from 2017 when he was investigated for an internal theft of payroll by padding overtime sheets.  He was never indicted and he wasn’t terminated.  But, a big “Fuck you!” to the police and everyone who complained about the Post-Dispatch article and posting of the link to the video arrived in the form of an old article that portrayed Officer Michael Langsdorf as a criminal.  When they received negative feedback from the police community, a half-assed apology appeared on behalf of the newspaper.

Too late!

I have friends who work for the Post-Dispatch. There are some decent folks there, but whichever douche bag committed those transgressions about a dead police officer (whose body hadn’t even reached room temperature) can kiss my entire Missouri ass! 

Officer Michael Langsdorf resigned from the St. Louis Metropolitan Police department after the police-hating Circuit Attorney, Kim Gardner, tried to “goon” him.  He certainly wasn’t going to stick around and see what she was going to do him “next time.”  There would not be another “next time” at the SLMPD for Langsdorf.  He got out before she could come after him again, and she probably would have.  She has a list. 

Kim Gardner is the overzealous St. Louis City Circuit Attorney, who kicked a hornet’s nest by indicting the governor of the State of Missouri, in an unbelievable case that was politically driven and motivated. It was unsubstantiated and based on fabricated evidence and perjury, by her lead investigator, that should have had her doing federal prison time by the end of the investigation surrounding her office. She should concentrate on making the City of St Louis safer by not coddling criminals and backing the police and not spending so much time trying to indict police officers for things that are so flimsy, they are laughable … unless you’re one of the cops on whose back she has painted a target.  That’s why cops are leaving the SLMPD in droves.  It’s the same in Chicago and Baltimore as well.

Demonize the police, abandon them, indict them on bullshit charges and try to put them in jail, then whine about how dangerous it is out in the streets where the police are out there every damn day, where they are killing us! 

Here’s a thought, a challenge really, for all of the politicians, judges, circuit attorneys and prosecuting attorneys with hidden agendas, those who coddle criminals attack the police and make a mockery of our judicial system.  Do your jobs and quit being soft!  If you are in a state that has the death penalty, use it for crying out loud!  You don’t have to pay for it out of your paycheck.  Murder in the 1st degree is some serious shit.  We’ll (the taxpayers) pay for it.  If the law applies in a murder case and it fits the criteria for the death penalty, apply it already.

So many times we hear, “We took the death penalty off the table to ensure a conviction and we let them take a plea to a lesser charge.”  Seriously, you’re the best we have and that’s what you give us?  Why not just kick us in the nuts? Why not do the job you’re supposed to be good at, and convince the jury that the murderer should get the death penalty. Let them decide.

The newly elected Prosecuting Attorney of St. Louis County, Mr. Wesley Bell, arrived on the job in January of this year.  His first order of business was to reopen the case of Michael Brown (who played a stupid game and won a stupid prize) and push to re-indict Officer Darren Wilson for the shooting and subsequent death of a criminal.  That being said, I don’t know Mr. Bell, never have I spoken with him, but if that was his first order of business at the time of his election, I’m going to step out on a limb and say he might have borrowed Kim Gardner’s playbook. 

According to a credible source, Mr. Bell is more into taking a softer approach to dealing with criminals and has a plan to streamline getting prisoners out of jail.  I thought the job of the Prosecuting Attorney was to put criminals in jail.  Isn’t helping them get out or stay of jail/prison the job of the Public Defender’s Office?

I have sent a message to Mr. Bell’s office regarding specifically, “Is the Death Penalty in the 1st degree Murder of Officer Michael Langsdorf off the table, or will you seek the death penalty?” I have yet to receive a response.

We’ll hear about how the death penalty is not a deterrent to other criminals.  That is arguable.

Missouri is a death penalty state.  It is the law.  The assassin of Officer Michael Langsdorf was in custody shortly after the murder, his capture was within close proximity to the murder scene, and he had the murder weapon on his person at the time of his arrest.  There are known witnesses to the murder of Officer Michael Langsdorf and there is video surveillance footage that captured the event. It has also been reported that the man charged with the murder of Langsdorf has confessed to the crime.  If these are facts regarding this case and this does not fit the criteria for the death penalty, and you don’t go after it…

You can kiss my entire Missouri ass as well!

Officer Machado keeps his mind and body in top shape

Officer Machado keeps his mind and body in top shape
By: Robert Foreman

PASSAIC COUNTY, N.J. - Officer Izzie Machado’s love of powerlifting began well over a decade ago and continues to this day. He has competed in numerous competitions, and he shows no signs of slowing down. Born in Union City, he was hired by the Passaic County Sheriff’s Office in January of 2010 as a corrections officer. He is currently assigned to the Passaic County Jail, where he is part of the Sheriff’s Emergency Response team and a Mobile Field Force Operator.

A graduate of Emerson High School, Machado spent two years at New Jersey University and moved to Jersey City. He held multiple retail management jobs at Book and Music Factory, Camelot Music, Suncoast, and GameStop. He played baseball from the age of 12 until moving on from the sport in 2012. Additionally, he played guitar for two different bands, Bruise Wish and Evil Adam. The latter band had an extensive run until playing their final show in 2006. However, his journey toward law enforcement began in an unexpected fashion.

“Toward the end of my retail days, I became a fugitive recovery agent with a few friends for a bail bondsman.  I really enjoyed the work and it got me thinking about going into law enforcement,” said Machado. “In 2008, when my retail career ended, I moved to Clifton and began working as a security officer at St. Mary's Hospital in Passaic. Both of those jobs helped me prepare for law enforcement.” 

Machado began powerlifting in 2007 in the United States of America Powerlifting League (USAPL). He admits that when he started out that he did not have much knowledge regarding training practices since that information was not as readily available as it is today. He noted that he wore squat suits, deadlift suits, a bench shirt and likely lifted heavier weight than he should have, on occasion, which ultimately caused a shoulder injury. For those who are interested in powerlifting, Machado advises that they become a member of a facility that is ‘powerlifting friendly’.

“I train at Strong and Shapely Gym in East Rutherford. While that gym is well-known for churning out professional bodybuilders, powerlifting has become very big there, too. There are plenty of 100 lb. plates, deadlift platforms, benches, squat racks, specialty bars, and a monolift. When preparing for a competition, I squat twice a week, bench twice a week, deadlift once, and the other days are about support exercises for those three lifts,” said Machado.

“I train six days a week, and no cardio is performed. The weights are exhaustive enough! In general, I follow the sub-maximal training method popularized by Mark Bell. Plus, you need a consistent crew of like-minded powerlifters there with you on a daily basis. I don't pay much attention to diet, other than trying to keep my protein and total calorie intake high. Having a box of donuts, or cookies, nearby while we lift is a common sight.”

Following his first four competitions, Machado stopped competing primarily due to injury. However, a few years ago he was introduced to a relatively new and popular powerlifting federation known as Revolution Powerlifting Syndicate (RPS). The federation is owned and operated by Gene Rychlak, who is the first person to ever bench press over 1000 lbs. Machado noted that he has competed seven times for RPS in both New Jersey and Pennsylvania and he currently holds records in both states. Machado stressed that he has gotten a great deal of support for his powerlifting from other law enforcement officers and that some members of the Paterson Police Department have recently started competing.

“Of course the members of my PBA, Local #197, show the most support. Sometimes, seemingly, going out of their way to congratulate me and root me on,” said Machado.

Machado noted that other officers have approached him for advice about increasing their strength on squats, bench press and the deadlift. He never turns anyone away who is seeking workout tips, and he takes pride in seeing people progress after giving them some guidance. Machado advises anyone who is interested in powerlifting to get proper advice before beginning and that they should “lift smart.”

“You should not go for maximal weights every week. Listen to your body when it asks for more time to rest and heal. Be consistent,” said Machado. “I’ve never felt like I had to choose between the two (law enforcement and powerlifting). Anybody in law enforcement should be doing something to stay in shape. I use my gym time for powerlifting. It never conflicts.”

Machado plans to continue lifting with RPS and he recently attained pro status in May after lifting 1735 lbs. Not one to rest on his laurels, his next goal is the 1900 lbs. total, which would qualify him for the XPC (Extreme Powerlifting Coalition). The XPC is affiliated with the RPSand holds a yearly competition at the Arnold Sports Festival in Columbus, Ohio. He hopes to compete there in the future. However, he realizes that powerlifting has benefited him in ways that he would never have imagined when he started.

“Personally, powerlifting has taught me that you are capable of much more than you know. In my last competition, I squatted 650 lbs. I had never even had that much on the bar before in my life, but I went for it anyway. I almost failed it, but when I felt the squat going wrong, I fought through it and forced the weight up and nailed that squat. The thought process almost takes you back to the police academy days, where you are pushed to your limits, and beyond as to be prepared for anything,” said Machado.

“Nothing good comes easy. The more work I put in, the more attention I put into training and eating directly affects my outcome. I'm 40 years old, and I'm stronger now than I ever have been. The biggest lesson I’ve learned would be that no matter how far you've come, there's much more down the road waiting for you if you really want it.”

Monmouth County Partnership Conducts 2nd Annual Forum on Autism, Project Lifesaver and Special Needs Registry

Monmouth County Partnership Conducts 2nd Annual Forum on Autism, Project Lifesaver and Special Needs Registry

By PIO Cynthia Scott and Undersheriff Ted Freeman, Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office

On April 2, 2019, World Autism Day, the Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office, Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office and Monmouth County Division of Aging, Disability and Veterans Services hosted its Second Annual Forum on Autism, Project Lifesaver and Special Needs Registry at the Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office Public Safety Center Special Operations Center.  The purpose of the forum was to bring together Project Lifesaver clients, family members and persons interested in learning about Project Lifesaver to share information and updates on programs for autistic individuals. Approximately 150 people attended the three-hour event.

“Although this annual event is held during National Autism Awareness Month, the Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office along with partners in law enforcement are committed to acknowledging this disorder all year, through such useful programs, in an effort to maintain the safety of individuals and spare families a lot of anxiety when locating or responding to a loved one’s needs,” said Sheriff Shaun Golden, a board member of the Monmouth/Ocean Foundation for children. “Every child on the autism spectrum deserves an opportunity to succeed in life. It is our job to assist them during their journey, to teach them that first responders are here to assist and support them, and, to help bring themselves closer to all that they can accomplish.”

“Some of our most passionate Special Needs Registry liaisons are those law enforcement officers who have family members with special needs,” said Christopher Grammicioni, Monmouth County prosecutor.  “There is no stigma in needing extra help, and these officers, who know that first-hand, are our best ambassadors for why this program is so needed.  The Special Needs Registry is successful because our law enforcement partners at the Prosecutor’s Office, Sheriff’s Office and municipal police departments work in tandem to provide the added support and attention that our special needs residents need.”

Lori Linskey, 1st Assistant Monmouth County prosecutor, opened the program with a discussion about the Special Needs Registry, a partnership between the Monmouth County Prosecutor’s Office, Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office and the Monmouth County Police Chiefs Association.  She explained that the program is free and is available to any person who lives, works or attends school in Monmouth County and has a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits one or more major life activity.  The registry was created to help emergency responders assist residents with special needs in emergent situations.  The Special Needs Registry provides vital information about the individual’s special needs, emergency contacts, a physical description and current photograph.

“Having the parent of a special needs child tell me that our Special Needs Registry gives them ‘piece of mind’ is the best incentive to continue to do all that we can to get as many people registered who can benefit from our program.  We hope that those who register never need to dial 911, but we take great pride in knowing that our collective efforts to create this program will make that process easier in times of emergency,” said Linskey.

Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office Autism Awareness Coordinator Fran Hines addressed the forum on the value of Project Lifesaver for individuals on the autism spectrum who may tend to wander.  Mr. Hines reviewed the procedure for enrolling autistic individuals in the Project Lifesaver program. Colleen Smith, LCSW, Caregiver Support, Monmouth County Office on Aging, talked about senior clients with memory disorders who tend to wander and reviewed the procedure for seniors to enroll in the program.  Sheriff’s Officers Joyce Schmidt and Patrick Luke explained the Project Lifesaver initial hookup procedures for the program, battery changes and response protocols.

Public Safety Telecommunicator Allison Welker explained how to call in a missing person when someone on the Project Lifesaver program wanders off. Detective Todd Smith, Freehold Township Police Department, father of an autistic child, shared some of his experiences in raising an autistic child from both perspectives as a police officer and as a parent of an autistic child.

PIO Cynthia Scott and Autism Coordinator Fran Hines showed segments of the new video-based “Bee Safe” Program, a program that teaches autistic individuals how to interact with police and other first responders in an emergency. Autistic individuals respond in different ways to sirens, personnel in uniform and to stressful situations to which first responders may be summoned.  

“The Special Needs Forum provided an opportunity to have first responders, program administrators, provider agencies and family members all in the same room sharing personal stories and information about program updates and services,” said Sue Moleon, executive director of the Monmouth County Office on Aging, Disabilities and Veterans Services.  “The break-out sessions included in this Forum offered participants a unique opportunity to witness in real time how technology is used to find a missing person and underscored the importance of supporting the use of these technological advancements.”

A panel discussion, moderated by Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office Public Information Officer Cynthia Scott, included Linskey, Detective Todd Smith, Autism Coordinator Fran Hines, PST Allison Welker, and Colleen Smith, LCSW.

A variety of participation options were available to the forum participants including demonstrations of bloodhound tracking, Project Lifesaver tracking and equipment, drone demonstration, static displays and tours of the Monmouth County Sheriff’s Office Communication Center at which Project Lifesaver and Special Needs Registry calls are received.

YOUR DREAM HOME

YOUR DREAM HOME
By Fasil Khan

As you engage in the search for your dream home, it helps to know what to look for during a home tour. It’s easy to get distracted or to feel overwhelmed as you tour a prospective home, so use these seven home-buying tips to know what to focus on when checking out your possible future abode.

The neighborhood: Even before arriving at the property, take note of other homes in the area as well as the general neighborhoods surrounding your prospective home. Assess how well neighbors care for their properties, see if the outdoor atmosphere is noisy and if the area seems safe. Check for unpleasant odors such as sewage or smells given off from manufacturing businesses. Take location into account, noting the home’s proximity to grocery stores, schools, restaurants or other frequently visited destinations. 

The roof: Roof repair or replacement can get costly, so it’s best to know the condition of your prospective home’s roof before you make an offer. A roof in poor condition may warrant a price adjustment. Look at the interior ceilings of the home to check for discolorations that may indicate water damage from a roof leak. A newer roof is less likely to leak and may even save you money on your homeowner’s insurance rate.

The plumbing: Not all major expenses are easily seen at first glance. Flush the toilet and pay attention to how long it takes to stop running afterward. Look under sinks to examine the pipes. Note if the pipes have leaks or if there appears to be mold or mildew near them. Look for other signs of water damage around the pipes, such as peeling paint or bubbled surfaces.

The basement: If you’re considering a home with a basement, check for water issues. Mold can cause health problems and should be taken very seriously. Ask if the basement area collects water during hard rains. Musty smells often indicate a moisture issue. A dehumidifier in the basement can also be a sign that the homeowner struggles with moisture levels in that area of the home.

Working order: Don’t be shy about making sure things work as they should. Turn on water faucets, check the water pressure in the shower and test out the garage door opener. Open and close doors and windows and check the locks on them. Your home will probably be one of the biggest financial investments of your life, and you have a right to know you’re making the best choice.

Property inspection: You wouldn’t likely purchase a car without having your mechanic take a look at it, would you? The same logic holds true for the purchase of a home. If you like the property and you are serious about making an offer, have a quality home inspection performed. A property inspection can help identify problems such as structural issues, pest infestations or asbestos. A little money spent up front for a property inspection can save you thousands of dollars after the sale. Know the home’s problems before they become your problems.

Personalization: Don’t sweat the small stuff. While you can’t easily change the location of a home or the way neighbors care for their yards, many aspects of your potential home can be modified to your tastes. Wall colors, carpet choices and curtains can be changed to fit your preferences. Don’t let a bright wall color or outdated carpet deter you from purchasing a home you otherwise love.

Summing it up…

Before attending a home showing, make a list of must-haves to keep you focused on what matters to you. Be mindful that your emotions don’t dominate your logic as you tour your prospective home. Keeping these tips in mind should make your home shopping process easier and more enjoyable.

Happy hunting!

Fasil Khan is a Paterson Police Officer and a Real Estate Agent at Keller Williams Village Square. Fasil enjoys helping fellow law enforcement officers with the purchase of investment properties, as well as general selling, purchasing needs and if you are looking to become an agent. Have questions? Connect with Fasil by calling 201-739-7397 or email at fkhan@khanrealestateteam.com