Are Drones Critical Equipment for Law Enforcement?

Are Drones Critical Equipment for Law Enforcement?
By Ken Dye

Enter the drone. A “hot” call is received. A drone can be launched almost immediately, arriving at the call before or shortly after the officers.

The drone can survey the area using the on-board infra-red, light, speaker and other capabilities including wireless and seamless data The information can be relayed to the officers or dispatch if the drone sees any suspicious activity. Situational awareness can be enhanced expotenially.

Based on recent FBI statistics, the number of police officers killed in the line of duty has been declining. The number of officers killed in unprovoked or ambush attacks are increasing.

In Euclid, Ohio, a police officer on a domestic call is ambushed by wanted felon. In Brevard County, Fla., a deputy is killed in ambush attack. In Salina, NY (think Syracuse), two officers were killed in yet another ambush attack.

The tactics used by law enforcement in response to a potentially dangerous situation or call are fairly standard. Hell, all law enforcement calls for service or self-initiated activity are potentially dangerous.

Drones have the capability to cover more ground and see more than officers on foot while searching for a suspect.

Additionally, drones have an important place in search and rescue operations.

The howl will rise from the guardians of social justice and those who fret over the potential for misuse. There will be a challenge to every aspect of drones used for police work.

The officers who walk out that front door must be given every opportunity to return.

Drones will become a law enforcement necessity in the near future.

“A Community That Supports Law Enforcement Is a Safe Community.”

Ken Dye is the author of 5 books about crime, cops and bad guys in the St. Louis area. He Blogs under “Cops Perspective” and has over 20,000 followers. Ken served with the St. Louis County Police Department for 13 years and finished his LE career with the Illinois Criminal Justice Authority as the administrator for the statewide MEG’s and Narcotics Task Forces.

POLITICS IS TOUGH: Professionalism vs. Popularity

POLITICS IS TOUGH: Professionalism vs. Popularity
By Joel E. Gordon

“Adhere to your purpose and you will soon feel as well as you ever did. On the contrary, if you falter, and give up, you will lose the power of keeping any resolution, and will regret it all your life.”  – Abraham Lincoln

Lincoln was, perhaps, the most successful president that the United States of America ever had. After having been part of a greatly successful law practice, he saved the United States, helped to abolish slavery and spoke some of the most memorable words in U.S. history, including the Gettysburg Address. Survey after survey on presidents put him at the very top or near top. I’d call that success. But history shows that he is a case study in failure throughout much of his lifetime. Consider the following:

• He was defeated for Illinois state legislator in 1832.

• He started a business only to see it go under. It was a store in New Salem, Illinois. His partner died and he could not sustain the business. He eventually paid off all the business’ debts.

• He lost his run for Congress in 1843 and again in 1848.

• He lost his bid to become a U.S. senator in 1855.

• He ran for vice president of the U.S. in 1856 and lost.

• He again ran for the U.S. Senate in 1859 and lost yet again.

Not unlike Lincoln, have you ever found yourself feeling somewhat Lincoln-like? I have. There have been times throughout my work years in the past where politics and popularity had seemingly trumped a track history of knowledge, problem-solving achievement and success. (A side-note: My wife nee’ Herndon is a direct descendant of Lincoln’s law partner of 16 years, William Herndon, her dad’s namesake).

I was a naïve 19-year-old when promoted by my then-employer Radio Shack to become a company store manager. This early performance-based career success falsely affirmed my belief that high-level performance and knowledge would translate to success elsewhere (and everywhere).

Imagine my dismay when upon becoming a Baltimore City police officer my career path was stymied while being bumped out of career development assignments and promotional opportunities by candidates benefiting from favoritism under affirmative action mandates. But I adhered to my purpose.

Since then, I have gone on to become a successful manager of a residential resort, police chief, published newspaper columnist, and managing editor of the BLUE Magazine to name a few successes; all based upon performance and ability. I was honored to be awarded for “Excellence in National Law Enforcement Leadership” by my peers at a well-attended police conference in Florida, perhaps the pinnacle of recognition of my career successes.

POPULARITY OVER PERFORMANCE: The Dilemma Unveiled

In today's fast-paced world, we often find ourselves at a crossroads when it comes to navigating the fine line between professionalism and popularity. The age-old question lingers: Should one prioritize a polished, professional image or strive for mass appeal and popularity?

Professionalism entails adhering to a set of standards, conduct and demeanor expected in a particular field or industry. It encompasses traits such as reliability, expertise and a serious approach to one's work. Maintaining professionalism instills trust and credibility among peers and others, laying the foundation for a successful career trajectory.

On the other end of the spectrum lies popularity, a coveted status in the age of social media and influencer culture. Popularity brings attention, followers and a sense of validation from the masses. It can open doors to opportunities and widen one's reach in the digital landscape. However, the allure of popularity often comes with a trade-off in terms of authenticity and depth of relationships.

While professionalism and popularity may seem like opposing forces, striking a balance between the two is key. I want to believe that it is possible to exude professionalism while still connecting with a broader audience on a personal level.

In the digital age, the lines between professionalism and popularity can become increasingly blurred. Social media platforms offer individuals the opportunity to showcase their professional expertise while also engaging with a wider audience on a more personal level.

Ultimately, authenticity emerges as the cornerstone of navigating the professionalism-popularity dichotomy. Being true to oneself, maintaining integrity and staying genuine in interactions can set individuals apart. Authenticity breeds trust and fosters genuine connections.

In the ever-evolving landscape of professionalism and popularity, finding a balance that aligns with one's values and goals is paramount. Embracing professionalism while staying true to one's authentic self can pave the way for a fulfilling and successful journey.

Although no longer naïve to the power of popularity over professional achievement, tribal mentality or the power of “good ol’ boy” politics, I will continue to keep the faith in all things I have to offer based upon my knowledge and successful experiences in my endeavor to improve the lives of others and make our world the best place possible to leave to future generations.

So when feeling slighted in the political realm of things, bear in mind the wisdom of Muhammad Ali, who pointed out “You don’t lose if you get knocked down; you lose if you stay down.” Or as Donald Trump would advise as he puts his faith in the voters “Never Surrender.”

Joel E. Gordon, Managing Editor of BLUE Magazine, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

“Accountability & the Crumbley Conviction”

“Accountability & the Crumbley Conviction”
By Lt. Joseph Pangaro (Ret.)

There are very few times in our personal and professional lives that we see a real landmark change in how our society functions. Be that as it may, we have just seen it in the conviction of James and Jennifer Crumbley, parents of Oxford Michigan High School shooter / killer Ethan Crumbley.

James and Jennifer Crumbley are being held to account for what their son, Ethan Crumbley, did when he killed four classmates, and for what they didn’t do as parents.

This is the first time such a charge has been made and a conviction has been sought and achieved. This is groundbreaking, but is it right?

That seems to be the question at hand. Was charging the parents for what the son did the correct action in this case or was it a response to the helplessness we feel in the face of the continuing deadly trend of school shootings?

To break that question down we have to look at its constituent parts.

First, the school shooting committed by Ethan Crumbley is a tragedy, it is a homicidal criminal act, and it is something that will cause suffering for every one of the victim’s families for the rest of their lives. Their community will also suffer from this terrible event, as will the many students who were seriously injured.

In a previous article I wrote, after an earlier tragic active shooter event, titled “Can we spot violence before it erupts”, I posited that in many instances we can spot potentially dangerous people before they attack us. The key is being aware of what potentially dangerous actions look like, recognizing the signs, and then doing something about it.

 This Oxford school shooting and the conviction of the parents of the shooter may finally bring this into tighter focus and create a moment of action.

Second, like all of these kinds of events, it presents us with a set of facts about how and why this attack took place. We must study these facts so we can try to understand if there are things that we can do in the future to prevent a similar incident.

The arrest and charging of the Crumbleys is a turning point. It is the act of holding people accountable for what they knew and should have acted on to prevent violence.

If this case survives the appellate division of the courts, and I have some doubts it will, but if it does it will set a precedent, change laws across the USA and change how law enforcement conducts their investigations, pre- and post- active shooter events and other violent incidents.

Some of the lesson learned must include understanding if the parents of the killer truly understood the danger their son posed, the trial results seem to indicate that the jurors believe they did. We must also understand the processes that were in place for the parents, friends, teachers, and the shooter himself to report concerns and then who was in place to investigate those concerns? And we have to understand what resources were in place, if any, to respond to these reports.

In a recent article I wrote called “The Kill list- preventing the next Columbine, Parkland, and Covenant school shooting” I discussed some of the signs we can see before someone attacks, signs we can take action on to prevent tragedy. Unfortunately, not every parent, school official, or even the police understand what signs to look for, which is why I wrote the article to begin with.

In this Oxford School shooting the trial seemed to reveal that the parents knew of their sons problems, the killer himself knew he had problems and asked his parent s for help, and it seems the school was aware of his potential problems as well. Why did no one act on it?

That leads me to the crux of this piece and the third consideration:

Besides Ethan Crumbley, the shooter, is anyone else responsible for this heinous crime? This is where this case and the convictions of Jennifer and James Crumbley is paradigm-changing and can affect all of us.

The questions I have, and I know they will cause some confusion, but I believe we must address them head-on if we are to use this tragedy to make changes that can prevent the next horrible attack.

Let me say clearly that I believe Ethan Crumbley is responsible for the carnage and death that day at Oxford High School, and he received an appropriate punishment (Life without parole), I could also make the case for the death penalty, but that is a different article. And I believe his parents may have culpability in the violence and killing that took the lives of four innocent young people and injured many more.

I say may have culpability because we all need to know more about the facts of this case. In general, the prosecutor found the parents had a vicarious liability as it relates to their sons actions and they were charged criminally.

As the prosecution tells us, the parents, with the knowledge they had, should have intervened before the violence and saved lives. Some facts we were all provided via news accounts were that, the killer was having mental problems and asked for help, but his parents ignored this request. His parents bought the killer a gun several days before the shooting and made it available to him. The gun was not secured so the troubled young man could not have access to it, and the parents knew he was dangerous.

If all of this information is correct, and the Crumbleys understood the danger, and they ignored the potential for violence, and did nothing to prevent their son from attacking his classmates, then I think a case can be made that they have some, if not a lot of responsibility.

And while the facts in this particular incident make a case for responsibility on the part of the parents, we must ask if the laws in place were specific to this kind of event, or were the laws interpreted to fit around the facts of this case in order to pursue the parents because of their parenting style, mindset, and their intentions and inaction based on their knowledge which was shocking to the conscience in light of the crime that was committed by their son.

In other words, we’re using the concept of vicarious liability, that a person who has charge over another person and therefore responsibility for their actions, such as supervisor over an employee or in this case a parent over a minor child is responsible for the child’s actions.

While vicarious liability it is an accepted concept in the workplace, does that concept hold the same power in relation to the parent/ child dynamic?

The vicarious liability concept works with a bartender and an over-served customer because the bartender is making on-scene observations of the patron and is directly involved in the intoxication of a person who eventually goes down the road and kills a family in a car accident. The idea is “If not for the actions of the bar tender, the patron would not be intoxicated and would not have caused a deadly accident.”There’s a clear and straight line between the events and people involved.

The problem we have as a society is that this case, including the arrest and convictions of the parents is potentially opening a whole new area of vicarious liability. It is an area that may have more consequences than intended. It can lead to prosecutions that may be unwarranted, or even unjust, as the potential to pursue suspects can be governed by emotion, or other nefarious motives.

And in either of those cases while we may be assuaged and comforted by the pursuit and conviction of people based on a vicarious liability concept, we may also be creating an injustice.

In any event, the facts of the Crumbley case will work their way through the courts and the arrest and convictions convictions may be upheld or the case can be rejected. If upheld all the way to the Supreme Court, then new laws will be established in many, if not all the 50 states of America. A new era of responsibility will dawn.

While on its face that might seem like a good idea, let’s consider these points.

Where else will vicarious liability be established? If a husband has too much alcohol to drink and decides to run to the store for milk and bread in an intoxicated state, is his wife now responsible to call the police to report his driving while intoxicated? If he has a car crash on the way and people are killed, is the wife then responsible and can be arrested, tried, and convicted?

What if a teenager is a known gang member and his/her parents know this to be true, and they also know that this gang deals in drugs and is violent, involved in turf wars, shootings, and murders. Then one night this teenager is involved in an altercation or a robbery and an innocent person is killed, will the parents then be liable to prosecution?

What about parents of an intellectually disabled child and suppose that child injures or kills another young person, are the parents liable to prosecution because they did not secure this child in the home?

As you can imagine, this “what if” questioning can go on all day, the possible scenarios are endless for the ways people can be held liable for the actions of another if we want it to be so. What must be done is as a society is we need to decide the value of opening the door and increasing the kinds of events that can determine responsibility for those not directly involved in the crime, and we have to determine how we are going to make it known to everyone what their culpability is.

We must decide how to deal with poor parenting, how to help parents with limited ability to comprehend the signs of potential problems, train our school officials to recognize the signs of potential violence and how to act, we must train our police officers to properly investigate any and all threats.

Some of the things I suggest are very difficult. How do we legislate poor parenting, or the inability to comprehend a danger, or to see our child’s actions as potentially deadly? And what kind of events do we designate as worthy of assigning vicarious liability to the point of prosecution?

In conclusion, the tragedy of the Oxford school shooting has destroyed many innocent families. Nothing will bring back the precious lives of the four students killed in their high school, the others who were seriously injured; nothing will fully comfort the grieving families who told us directly of their pain and suffering. But that does not mean we don’t have to do more to prevent the next Oxford school shooting.

Ethan Crumbley will spend his entire life in prison, as is just. James and Jennifer Crumbley will spend 10-15 years in prison. And all of us can look for and learn the lessons this incident offers and make the changes we need to make to make our schools safer for our children.

Our state governments need to create specific laws to address this kind of liability, define it, and ensure it is fair and applied equally. And we all need to hope that whatever is created has value for our society and does not go too far with good intentions.

There are many things to consider.

Joseph Pangaro is a 27-year veteran of law enforcement. He retired in 2013 at the rank of Lieutenant and currently serves as the Director of School Safety and Security for a large school district in NJ. He is also the owner of Pangaro Training and Management, a company that provides training to the public and private sector on a host of topics. Email: JPangaro@Yahoo.com

Police and Justice Press Releases – Digital Media Get New National Exposure

Police and Justice Press Releases – Digital Media Get New National Exposure
By Leonard Adam Sipes, Jr.

I’m not sure that everyone in the police and justice communities understands what’s going on within the local and national media landscape. Media outlets throughout the country are being slammed with revenue losses. Thousands of reporters and support personnel are either losing their jobs or are being asked to do more.

Google search is transitioning to AI and new algorithms, and websites are taking a huge hit. Artificial intelligence is beginning to offer answers rather than links to news sites.

The Washington Post has lost 50 percent of its audience. They are losing tens of millions of dollars. The news media landscape is changing dramatically with new forms of digital media taking its place.

What’s Changing
There are now national digital media sources using artificial intelligence to scrape news content from sources and offer them throughout their platforms.

I live in two parts of the country, and it’s obvious that local media are simply running press releases from law enforcement and justice agencies as their primary content source.

Your police or criminal justice press release from Pittsburgh is now ending up in Boston and markets throughout the country. National news outlets are using some of this material. This concept is in its infancy but it could expand rapidly.

What This Means for You?
After 35 years of directing media relations for national and state criminal justice agencies, it means that you have to expect a much wider audience than you are used to. This could have implications for your agency; something intended for your local or state market might get a larger audience than you intended.

Stories about crime and justice have relevance. With fear of crime at record levels per Gallup, what happens locally may be of interest to other areas of the county.

It also means that your proactive media efforts could have more power. The days of the experienced and savvy crime reporter are just about over. More than ever, your press releases are falling into the hands of general assignment reporters who will simply run what you say without further clarification or fact-checking.

I traveled the country after creating successful justice-related television and radio shows and podcasts teaching others how to do the same. I preached that agencies now have almost unlimited power to bypass mainstream media sources to get their message out. There are now sheriff departments that are putting out a steady stream of digital products (i.e., podcasts, video, audio) that are part entertainment and part news.

In my teaching efforts, I preached that we are responsible for balance and accuracy and presenting both sides of a story. If we are now the sole source of how a story is being covered, we have ethical and practical obligations. There are still reporters at the national and local levels who are capable of seeing obvious falsehoods or inconsistencies in your products who may challenge your assertions, thus a commitment to accuracy is in the public’s (and your) best interest.

Conclusions
Polls indicate a high degree of trust in law enforcement, regardless of demographics. That’s not the case for the media although local news outlets still have more confidence than their national counterparts.

There are emerging national and regional news outlets that will carry your content without you knowing it. How long they last and how widespread they become will change. It’s a new digital media world with real implications as to how we communicate.

You need to understand that there are plenty of lesser-known national media sources addressing crime issues. You do not want to be on their radar if you are creating proactive media with inaccuracies or blatantly one-sided content. Good, experienced reporters still exist who can (and will) challenge your efforts. I say this despite some sheriffs aggressively offering their digital media who don’t seem to care that they are challenged.

They “will” care if something meant to be promoted becomes a negative national story.

But law enforcement and justice agencies have a new power to communicate if it’s used responsibly. Just understand that whatever you create needs to be looked at through a new lens. You may create a press release or podcast that fairly conveys information but gets a wider audience (including advocates) who may challenge your assertions.

It’s in your best interest to apply journalistic ethics to make sure you got the story right. This mandates a new breed of media relations or public affairs officers who understand that the news landscape is changing and that their proactive media needs to be held to a higher standard.

I once went to an agency head who provided me with misinformation on a breaking story, and although it didn’t sound quite right, I assumed that he knew what he was talking about so I went with his assertions. They turned out to be false. He resigned. The story became profoundly negative.

Justice media relations people need to have the ability to push back when necessary to make sure they have the correct facts fairly presented. If they do, they now have more power than ever before to get their message out and influence public opinion.

Leonard Adam Sipes, Jr.is a retired federal senior spokesperson. A former Adjunct Associate Professor of Criminology and Public Affairs - University of Maryland. Former advisor to the “McGruff-Take a Bite Out of Crime” national media campaign. Past police officer. Aspiring drummer. Operator of CrimeinAmerica.net. His book based on thirty-five years of criminal justice public relations,” Success with the Media: Everything You Need to Survive Reporters and Your Organization” is available at Amazon and additional booksellers. He can also be found @ leonardsipes.com

Thriving Inside the Thin Blue Line

Thriving Inside the Thin Blue Line
By Monica Eaton Crawford

• "What tips do you have for me starting out as a police officer/firefighter/EMT?"

• "How much makeup is too much makeup?"

• "What uniform clothes/brands fit women best, when all they issue are men's gear?"

• "What can I do to look cute/feminine on the job?"

These are all questions I see frequently within female first responder groups.

I think all of them come from a great place in wanting to "fit in," do the job, not make too many waves, while finding our own personality and how we can stay true to ourselves in a male-driven career field. While there can be mixed opinions on these things, here's my two cents for what it's worth. The tide is turning and I am here for it.

No longer do women need to conform to the men's standards and men's way of doing things on the job. If anything, I believe now is the time to lean into who you are and what you can confidently say you bring to the table. This means your strengths, your weaknesses, your background, your drive and your personality.

Sure, there are policies and procedures to be adhered to, but outside that, I say stay true to who you are. Which means dressing in uniform clothes you feel confident in, that fit well, that you don't feel like a sack of potatoes in because the waistline is so high your gun is in your armpit and the uniform shirt sleeves go down to your elbows in a parachute-pant type of way.

It means, wearing whatever makeup you feel comfortable and confident in. If you look good, you feel good. It's going to improve your mood, your work output and your job performance. If there's something unique you want to wear, lean into it where it makes sense to. My signature thing is wearing a Junk Brands headband (albeit black or navy blue) and hot pink earmuffs on the range (pictured below). Just because I work in a male-driven job doesn't mean I have to look like one of the boys, too.

I also sport a confident "tactical tampon" pocket on my outer vest for myself and also for my female arrestees because sometimes a small gesture like a better quality tampon goes a long way when they ask for the cardboard ones from a male jailer/CO. These are the things that make us unique as women and things that don't need to be squashed because another co-worker (male or female) thinks we should.

It's tough to be bold sometimes and stand out in a way that is authentic to us. But ultimately, making the choice to stay true to who we are, regardless of outside opinion, is exactly what will help us to increase our impact in the people we serve every day.

For my valued male and my female colleagues alike, the main problem I see within my online nutrition, fitness, and mindset coaching business, Five-0 Fierce and Fit, and within the first responder fields is that we, as a population, tend to lose ourselves within the career we serve.

I think cops are the worst in that. Being a cop somehow becomes our identity on and off the clock. We start donning the blue line flag on shirts and posting it on walls and photos around the house. We lean away from friends and family who just don’t quite get what we do or what we go through daily. Worst of all, many of us become slaves to the job.

It comes to the point where we forget who we were before becoming a law enforcement officer. We drop everything else to work, sleep and repeat. Our hobbies get thrown out the window, our family events and birthdays become forgotten and accepted as missed, and we lose our sense of self.

Until one day, we wake up miserable. We get tired of running ragged, constantly stressed out, and sluggish. We get tired of noticing our clothes and uniform have gotten tighter, and suddenly, we’re twenty pounds (or more) overweight.

We get tired of feeling like we’re breathing heavily on a simple task at work or getting outrun again by the latest shithead in our jurisdiction. We get tired of missing family events and important events of loved ones.

I don’t know about you, but none of the three law enforcement agencies I have worked for told me when I got hired, “At some point, you might hate your life working here,” because of those things I listed above. It was, “Here, read this book, and good luck to you.”

Our departments do a great job of teaching us how to cop, but they forget about teaching us how to live so that we can continue to cop for 25 years and beyond.

This article contains some excerpts from Monica’s new book Thriving Inside the Thin Blue Line… Available on Amazon and Lulu.com.

Monica Eaton Crawford is the owner/ CEO of Five-0 Fierce and Fit which creates online nutrition and fitness programs designed to help female first responders lose fat, gain strength and take back their confidence in 90 days because “your family depends on you to be fit for duty.” Using her six-year Oklahoma law enforcement experience along with her 15-year background in fitness and nutrition she helps female first responders reach their full potential in life and career. Look her up on Instagram @five0.fierce.and.fit.

BIG T & small t TRAUMAS

BIG T & small t TRAUMAS
By Darci Werner

The three-month-old lay curled up on Dad's chest oblivious to the surrounding noise of people in the small auditorium and the guest speaker up on stage. Across the aisle is where I sat, watching the tender pats of the large hand gently tapping his baby’s fragile back to ease into slumber. Both of us were attending for the same thing; a seminar for first responders and their spouses to help strengthen their marriage. One of the speakers included in the program was a counselor focusing on brain health and helpful strategies to promote healing from trauma.

The adjacent couple was just beginning on their adventure with this new little member of their family, whereas mine was 22 years older and still an active part of our current situation. I sat looking around the room at faces, couples of many ethnic backgrounds and ages. They were all supposed to be retired. Many were medically retired from areas of armed forces, fire and police departments. As I looked into the faces, I wondered if they, too, were facing the demons that now plague my husband’s mind as he lets go of the scenes that haunt him from the years of service.

This couple has an opportunity to heal as this little one grows so as not to affect his own life path. Ours does not understand or have patience for the trials, temper tantrums and emotional drain that plagues at a moment’s notice.

“Tell him to just suck it up.” My son told me one afternoon as I explained how his dad had a really rough night. Dreams that make him spring out of bed and catch his breath. He walks on eggshells on the down days not knowing when, or what will set off eruptions that set his mind spiraling. Nor does he see how I am caught in the middle. Always trying to keep the peace between the two, making sure they are separated to hinder any blow-up on those tender days. My new household chore of running interference. I said a prayer the moment the couple sat across from me. A baby's scream is a trigger. It developed after a tactical drug raid that involved small infants. I don't know of others, so do not know how to protect his recall from them. He doesn't tell me things to spare my own mental clarity.

This little one whose life is beginning can be fragile in trusting the people in his future life, especially his father. Mine is pulling away because of the fear of the mood swings and getting tired of side-stepping to avoid conversations.

My eyes look at the many wives who have come to this event. We are all looking for the same helpful advice and a way to keep our marriage intact among the turmoil and trauma. How to support without losing ourselves in the process. We are taught about Big T and Small T traumas. They are all big in my eyes when you are trying to hold a family unit together. The pain in watching him struggle to deal with the memories. The confusion and frustration felt by our son.

And on some days, I too, want to just say “deal with it” and move on. Trauma may be personal to the officer or first responder, but it will affect those around him or her.

There is comfort in numbers. I didn't feel so alone among the other spouses who quietly deal with their own home situations. I learned how important it was for these men and women to get proper help, as well as for the care giver. You can't be strong for them if you, too, are falling apart. As a parent, the man with his infant will hopefully heal his heart for the sake of that little joy curled up on his chest.

Just as my retired officer will do his healing for the sake of our son and our marriage it will be a long road for both and those that stand next to them.

Darci Werner is a retired police wife residing in Northeast, Iowa. She writes for Chicken Soup for the Soul, Lyrical Iowa, and Guidepost. She thanks Blue Magazine for providing alternative topics for all who support law enforcement and is honored to share police family life stories.

Overcoming Barriers in Getting Mental Health Assistance

Overcoming Barriers in Getting Mental Health Assistance
By Stan Popovich

I struggled with fear and anxiety for over 20 years, and I am a huge advocate in getting professional help for your mental health. I always recommend that the first step in overcoming any mental health issues is talking to a mental health counselor.

Unfortunately, there are many barriers that I experienced to talking to others in getting that assistance all of us desperately need. As a result, here are just three of the most common obstacles that many people face in seeking help for their mental health.

Mental health counseling can get very expensive.
A one-hour session with a counselor can be around $100 without health insurance. Many people who struggle with mental health can’t afford health insurance and do not have the money to pay to see a counselor. I also talked to people who did have health insurance; however their health plan only covered one session a month or 12 sessions a year. Unfortunately, many people need more intense counseling than just one session a month.

Many low-cost mental health problems have waiting lists.
There are low-cost mental health programs available; however there are long waiting lines to get in. I personally tried to get into a mental health program at my local hospital. I tried getting in and I was told that there was a four-month waiting list. I called back after four months, and they told me I still had to wait. Unfortunately, I was never able to get into the program because there were too many people ahead of me.

Changes in counseling staff.
There were many times I had to change counselors due to staff changes which severely disrupted my progress and recovery. One time, I had a great mental health counselor for a year. Unfortunately, my counselor had to move to another state. Years later, I had another counselor, and she eventually changed careers. Counselors come and go, which can severely disrupt a person’s mental health recovery. Every time you get a new counselor, it takes many months for the counselor and patient to get to understand each other. When you change counselors, you have to start over in getting to know someone else. I found this very frustrating, and these staff changes hindered my progress.

What I did to get help in my own life.
There is no substitute for counseling; however I decided to make things a lot easier for myself to get the relief that I desperately needed while I encountered these obstacles.

As a result, here are seven options I used to get help as quickly as possible.

1.Contact your doctor: Your doctor is a great source in finding available mental health resources in your area. Explain your situation to your doctor and ask if he or she knows of anyone who can help you. Chances are your doctor will be able to give you some referrals.

2. Go to the nearest hospital: Your local hospitals can give you immediate assistance for your mental health issues when it’s an emergency. Once your situation is manageable, the people at the hospital will be able to give you options where you can continue treatment without having to wait. The people who work at a hospital know of other professionals in your area who can provide you with additional treatment.

3. Talk to the insurance companies: Your insurance company can provide a list of mental health services and other treatment programs that are covered in your health plan. If you do not have health insurance, you could still contact some of those companies and see if they can point you in the right direction regarding your current circumstances. There could be some affordable programs in your area that you do not know about.

4. Talk to the local churches: Your local churches may know of programs in your area that you could go to for help in overcoming your anxieties and stresses. Many churches offer mental health and addiction programs that anyone can take advantage of. A priest or clergy can also provide additional advice to your situation.

5. Find a support group: There are all kinds of mental health support groups that can help you with your issues. Go to a support group in your area and meet people who are also struggling with addiction and depression. A person can go on the internet or talk to some of the local mental health organizations to get more information about what is in their area.

6. Network with others: Many people have dealt with fear and anxiety sometime in their life. Talk to the people you trust to see if they have any suggestions on where you can go for some assistance. Make sure that your friends can keep things confidential and do not get into the habit of giving out too much personal information to others.

7. Contact your local mental health organizations: There are many private, public, nonprofit and governmental organizations that specialize in various mental health services that you can talk to for some assistance. The people at these places can give you some ideas on where you can find some mental health programs and counselors who can help you right away.

Stan Popovich is the author of “A Layman’s Guide to Managing Fear” www.managingfear.com

From Calm to Chaos

From Calm to Chaos
By Officer Deon Joseph

My day a while back?

If some of folks spent one hour doing my job, you probably would quit. It is the ultimate emotional rollercoaster.

So I was in Skid Row holding a prayer vigil for those who were murdered in a past month. It was a beautiful moment as service providers, community members and officers memorialized those many people ignore.

Prior to the event, I was talking to community members and a guy approached me with a beautiful red snake on his arm. We chopped it up for a bit, and as we talked, the snake unraveled itself a bit from his arm and got close to my hand. Its tongue was flickering the back of my hand for a bit, then it crawled on my arm. The man said “She must like you. She doesn’t do that with no one else but me.” That was so awesome.

We engaged in the vigil and we and during the event I brought up the subject of building community. When we were done, we shared a hug and I was about to go to the station when a tall man with a cello approached me stating “Officer. I was assaulted. They broke my cello.” He showed me the damage. He said they swung a pipe at his face and as he turned to avoid it, his cello was struck. I agreed to take a report for him. As I’m trying to deal with some tech issues so I could complete it, he said, “Can I pray for you?” I said “Sure”. He then said “I’ll do you one better. Can I play for you?” I obliged him. He pulled out his cello and played some Bach. It was beautiful and right on time. The melodic playing calmed me as I was becoming frustrated with our new system. I was finally able to take the report and was interrupted by the sweetest Asian woman… again.

BACKSTORY
So the day before, I was at headquarters checking on my wife and sons as they were cleaning up from a catering event there. This Asian woman approached me and spoke to me in Chinese. Couldn’t understand a word she said. But my 28 years of experience told me she was mentally ill. I didn’t want to ignore her. So I pulled out my translator and engaged her. Now it was clear she suffered from schizophrenia. She lovingly held me hostage for about 30 minutes and we continued to talk. When we were done, she said, “Thank you. You are the only person who listened to me today. Can I see you tomorrow?” I told her she could. (If she could find me)

Back to the present: So I’m wrapping up the report with the musician and lo and behold the Asian lady finds me. In Skid Row of all places. She walked up to me and gave me her phone. It read “I looked all over for you friend. I am glad I found you. Can we talk again?” I was going to explain to her that I couldn’t at the moment when my 70-year-old Spanish fiancé exploded toward me with her walker in a jealous rage. She was cursing at me in Spanish. She was probably accusing me of cheating. I tell her I can’t talk right now, and a woman comes up to me wanting me to file a missing persons report for her boyfriend. I tell her to go to the station and I would meet her there.

As I break away from everyone to get in my car to find the man who assaulted the cellist. I put my key in the ignition and the damn battery was dead. As I’m calling for tow, a frantic woman runs up to my window yelling “Officer! That man assaulted me!! I want him arrested!”

I get out of my car and see a tall muscular shirtless man getting squared up on by several males. The woman told me, “He slapped me and threw me down on the ground. I want to press charges!” As I approached him, he was clearly out of his mind. I grabbed him to detain him and like a child, he went limp and leaned into me. I felt he was about to do the Folsom roll, which is a tactic used in assaulting officers. But unfortunately for him, I was no frail woman. I held him up until units arrived to help me. The placed him in the back of a patrol car.

The incredible part of this story was this: Two witnesses came forward, in Skid Row of all places, and gave their account of what happened to the woman. They stood up for her without fear of being seen as a snitch.

I truly believe they were inspired by the vigil and the messaging of community and decided to step up. It gave me hope.

I was on a high after that. Then it all came crashing down when I got a call that a family member passed away. Still had to go to a department event and smile like I wasn’t hurting inside.

And how was your day?

Deon Joseph is a 28 year veteran of law enforcement in Southern California - 24 of those years working in the homeless community to create an environment conducive to change for those in recovery, as a Lead Officer. He’s been recognized for his work locally and nationally, and news stories and documentaries surrounding his work in crime fighting and community relations, featured him. www.deonjoseph.org

The Transformation from Citizen to Law Enforcement Officer

The Transformation from Citizen to Law Enforcement Officer
By Marty Katz

Recently, I wrote a commencement speech for the graduating class at a local police academy. Here, I would like to share excerpts of that speech. Just before I spoke to the class, I told the audience that I would be talking directly to the class, a private conversation, but if they wanted to, they could listen in. This piqued their interest.

Congratulations, you have completed the transformation from citizen to law enforcement officer. You have passed all the hiring segments, survived the physical and mental training of academy life, sacrificed a lot over the last 20-plus weeks, and successfully arrived at this moment in your life. You have worked hard through personal and family hardships and are now at the launching of a new career. Please don’t throw it all away by forgetting the rules and your sworn oath. From this point forward, until you retire, you will be in the public eye, subject to constant Monday morning quarterbacking; every action you take or don’t take will be subject to intense scrutiny. It is just a fact of life from now on.

Remember, this is a service profession. It is your responsibility to protect and serve. Never take action based on emotion. What you do will have lifelong consequences for the citizens you deal with. Never allow a victim to be victimized a second time due to poor police practices.

Do not get complacent. I have seen officers who had one year of experience 20 times over. This is an exciting career with many pitfalls and stumbling blocks: learn what to avoid. Seek out motivated co-workers as mentors; remember this: Even teachers have teachers. Law enforcement is a perishable skill that must be cultivated frequently. Stay sharp by doing crisis rehearsal in your downtime and on your own time.

You are the next generation of urban warriors. I have retired, and the torch has been passed to you. Like all retired officers, I must depend on you to respond appropriately when we call. Please don’t let us down.

You must always be inquisitive, suspicious, and thorough; otherwise, you are unfit for duty. The first line of defense for your community lies with you. It is a fine line you walk. It is not us against them. While the public might take it personally, we should not. Police officers follow the path of truth. We investigate and follow the trail of evidence to the truth. It is about helping those who need help and arresting those who prey on society. And always, always remember this: right is right, even if no one else is doing it. Wrong is wrong, even if everyone else is doing it.

Paul Whitesel, a leading authority in officer survival, often asks this question of new officers. Have you ever been to a circus? Why, you might ask? At a circus, the lion tamer is in the ring before the lions enter. The reason is to establish dominance; otherwise, you would see a different show. As law enforcement officers, we must enter the home, the safe haven of others. We are the only animal that must do that. Because of this, we must hone our survival skills and always be aware, or as we call it, situation awareness. From the moment you leave the safety of your homes until you arrive back after your shift, you are in uniform, you are on the streets, you must never let your guard down, and you must forever be totally focused.

Take time to remember your family. They were here before you attended the academy; they were by your side as you trained here, and they will be with you long after you hang up your guns. Law enforcement is a fantastic profession, but remember, while you are out there on the streets, your family is home worrying and concerned about you. Relax their worries and assure them of your professionalism by your proper actions. To do this, never let the job consume you and find time for them.

Also, leave your family concerns at home and for another time. A distracted officer is one who is needlessly put in harm’s way and, as a result, places others in harm’s way.

Every shift is new. Prepare for each shift by ensuring all your equipment is working correctly and you are thinking properly. Go home safe after each shift. That is rule number one.

I could talk about officer survival for several hours — and from this day forward, you will hear about this subject daily — but congratulations on an outstanding performance for now. Welcome to the greatest profession in the world. You have a unique opportunity because you can dramatically change someone’s life for the better by taking the time to care, truly protect, and serve. Welcome to the family of law enforcement. Stay safe. If you don’t mind, I would like to address the audience that has patiently waited for me to get back to them.

At this point, I turned and readdressed the audience.

I saw out of the corner of my eye that most of you were actively listening. I hope you bring some of my advice back to your individual departments. Law enforcement must return to the basics: ownership of one’s patrol area, partnerships with the citizen and business communities, equality for all under the law, and taking responsibility for one’s actions. Times have changed and continue to change. What has not changed is our role in society. Protect and serve. We are the 24/7 helpline and defense for our streets and neighborhoods.

With that in mind, let’s welcome our new officers to our family, congratulate them on a job well done, and assist them in becoming officers we would want as our backups and future leaders.

Thank you for the opportunity to speak here tonight. Let’s be careful out there.

Marty Katz is a retired sergeant with the Broward Sheriff’s Office in Fort Lauderdale, Florida. During his 34-year career, his assignments included field training officer, SWAT team member, undercover narcotics detective, academy instructor, street crime suppression unit, and supervisor of Recruitment, Criminal investigations, and Patrol. Marty is a Florida Department of Law Enforcement certified instructor (Firearms, Defensive Tactics, Driving, First Responder, Ethics, and Human Diversity), Expert Witness for Use of Force issues, a member of ILEETA, and past Florida Chapter Director for the International Association of Ethics Trainers In addition, Marty has trained in Japan with the Tokyo Metropolitan Riot Police and is a martial arts instructor. Marty is the owner and chief instructor of Crimewave Solutions, a training company for officer survival and common sense self-defense. Past the Uniform, Hot Potato, and From Another Dimension are three books authored by Marty and available on Amazon.

BOOK REVIEW - CROSSFIRE SOUTHWEST

BOOK REVIEW - CROSSFIRE SOUTHWEST
By: Michael DeMarco

This fictional work presents some of the daily occurrences of a career policeman, from rookie cop to the position of chief. His personal story illuminates aspects of law enforcement that will resonate in readers who value peace at home and on the streets. Warning: Many of the stories are humorous.

It all begins in late summer back in 1968. Braden Vicentin, a long-haired seventeen-year-old from the East Coast, heads to Arizona to start college and quickly realizes he has touched down in a foreign land. The history, food, language and customs all play a part in causing the culture shock he experiences. He endeavors, adapting to the new social environment and to the expectations placed on him in academia.

Over time, Braden falls in love with Tessie, a local girl whose Hispanic upbringing only adds to her charm. Their bonds grow stronger. Upon graduation, Braden is faced with many questions; most important is whether to remain in Arizona or to pursue work elsewhere. His heart decides. He remains in Arizona to be close to Tessie and finds work in the city’s police department.

Just how Braden gets hired is a story in itself. Then comes years on night shift, walking the beat, patrolling in a squad car and answering the “siren song”— the alluring call for help that is also potentially harmful or dangerous for any law enforcement officer. Yes, there are accounts of cops, robbers, drunks, and bikers. There are also accounts of compassion for the public, comradery among fellow officers, and love of family.

Michael DeMarco received a Master’s Degree from Seton Hall University. He founded Via Media Publishing in 1992, publishing a quarterly journal and over seventy-five books. In recent years, he has been focusing on his own writing, including Wuxia America: The Emergence of a Chinese American Hero. Mike has also consulted and appeared in television documentaries that were aired on the Discovery Channel, The History Channel, Arts and Entertainment, and The Learning Channel. He lives in Santa Fe, New Mexico.

Winston Vs Eichmann: Our Individual and Institutional Question

Winston Vs Eichmann: Our Individual and Institutional Question
By Peter Marina, Ph.D.

"My house shall be called a house of prayer, but you have made it a den of thieves."

While the above quote derives from the biblical Jesus expressing displeasure at the corruption and commercialization of religious practices within a sacred institution, the same can be applied to all our societal institutions. Perhaps we can say, “Our institutions shall be called a place of righteousness, but you have made it a den of thieves.”

Paul Tillich, prominent existential theologian and philosopher, wrote that all institutions are inherently demonic. This symbolic term “demonic”describes how our institutions embody the destructive tendencies and distortions of human life and meaning.

As Chris Hedges reminds us, American theologian and public intellectual Reinhold Niebuhr argued that institutions, composed of fallible humans, are incapable of achieving the same level of morality as individuals who retain the potential to struggle for integrity and righteousness.

While we know those who sit in the highest ranks of our institutions make up a den of thieves, what about the rest of us who occupy roles within these institutions?

I’ve observed two ideal types of individual behaviors within institutions.

The first is Adolf Eichmann, a Nazi bureaucrat and key architect of the Holocaust. The second is George Orwell’s main protagonist in 1984, Winston Smith. He was a compliant cog in Big Brother’s propaganda machine. The existential question is “Am I more like Eichmann or Winston?” First, a quick review of each prototype.

Major characteristics of Eichmann’s personality based on his portrayal by Hannah Arendt:

            1.Bureaucratic mindset, conformity and obedience: Eichmann embodied a bureaucratic mindset, focused on carrying out orders and adhering to established procedures rather than reflecting on the moral implications of his actions. His obedience to Nazi ideology and hierarchy led him to commit horrific acts without moral hesitation.

            2. Lack of introspection: Eichmann displayed an inability to engage in introspection. He did not critically examine his own role in genocide and instead viewed himself as merely a cog in the bureaucratic machine.

            3. Banality of evil: This phrase, coined by Arendt, describes Eichmann's actions and mindset — the mindset that his participation in genocide was not driven by malice or sadism but rather by mundane conformity to social norms and everyday routines. Despite the monstrous nature of his crimes, he was outwardly normal and ordinary in both appearance and behavior.

            4. Superficiality and lack of empathy: Eichmann lacked deep empathy or understanding for the suffering of his victims. He viewed Jews and other targeted groups as mere abstractions, detached from the human reality of their suffering.

            5. Rationalization and self-delusion: Eichmann rationalized his actions and portrayed himself as a mere functionary following orders, rather than taking personal responsibility for his role in the institution’s evil.

Major characteristics of the personality of our second character, Winston Smith:

            1. Outer conformity: Despite his rebellious thoughts and desires, Winston outwardly conformed to the expectations of the Party by performing his job in the Records Department of the Ministry of Truth, where he altered historical records to fit the Party's narrative.

            2. Survival instinct: Winston's compliance to his job can be seen as a survival instinct, as he understood the consequences of non-conformity and the dangers of defying the Party.

            3. Ambivalence and inner conflict: While Winston carried out his job duties, he felt a sense of ambivalence and inner conflict. He despised the Party's propaganda and manipulation of truth but recognized the necessity of complying with it to avoid detection. As he engaged in activities that went against his beliefs, hewas forced to make moral compromises.

            4. Compartmentalization: Winston compartmentalized his actions, separating his outward conformity from his inner rebellion. He rationalized his compliance as a necessary evil while maintaining rebellious thoughts and desires in secret.

            5. Fear of the system's power: His outward compliance serves as a symbol of the Party's power and control over its citizens, illustrating how even those who harbor rebellious thoughts are coerced into submission through fear and manipulation.

Who are you? Better yet, who do you want to become? Since we possess human agency to go against our unruly biological, instinctual tendencies — as well as the norms of our institutions — we can strive to become better than both these characters and our institutions.

This is essential, perhaps more so than in any other institution, for those who work in law enforcement and the criminal justice system.

Can you think independently, above the bureaucratic mindset?

Can you develop introspection and think about the moral consequences of your job? Can you look beyond the logic of what is acceptable in your institutional roles and behaviors?

Can you become a genuine person and develop empathy to see the actor’s point of view? Can you fully become aware of their subjectivity?

Can you rise above the mundane and become a hero who serves others? Can you move beyond conformity to social norms and bureaucratic routines?

Can you refuse to engage in rationalization and self-delusion (“I’m just doing what I’m told”) and instead take responsibility for your actions?

Can you think past the survival instinct and stand up to power and authority, and refuse moral compromises, despite the personal consequences?

Can you overcome fear of the system's power, refuse moral compromise, and stand up to the den of thieves within your institutions?

Jesus cleansed the Temple in Jerusalem, overturning the tables of money changers and driving out those who were buying and selling, expressing his sense of disquiet at the commercialization of religious practices within the sacred space. Our society is composed of institutions which, theoretically, embody our subjectivity (human soul and essence) objectified into an external reality that is supposed to serve the interests of all our brothers and sisters. Perhaps we need to remain strong, independent and courageous so that we, too, can drive out the thieves from the den of our corrupted institutions.

Dr. Peter Marina is a sociologist and criminologist at the University of Wisconsin – La Crosse. Along with his father, (retired) Lieutenant Pedro Marina, he teaches human rights policing to law enforcement professionals throughout the United States. He is author of the Human Rights Policing: Reimagining Law Enforcement in the 21st Century with Routledge Press (2022).

Pursuit… Score One For The Good Guys!

Pursuit… Score One For The Good Guys!
By Dale Gabriel

A pursuit can be defined as the effort to secure or attain. Every cop loves pursuits AND hates them. You get an adrenaline rush that is unmatched in any way in life. Let's face it, who among us wouldn't love to go fast and do whatever we want without any consequences? Not only CAN police officers do it, but we MUST. The bottom line, however, is that you DO have consequences. Your actions, though just in response to someone else's, put hundreds of lives in danger every minute. While you have a sense of control, you're REALLY not in control at all. You are at the mercy of that person you are trying to secure. You must do everything he or she does and do it better and faster and safer. If he goes 100, you must go 101. If he runs a light, you must do it better. People are watching YOU. If he passes illegally, you must follow while making sure not to risk any more lives than necessary. Remember, you are not only responsible for your actions and what may happen, but also HIS.

And what about the end; how is it going to end? Will you be forced to call it off, because too many lives are being put at risk? Is he going to crash, possibly hurting himself of others? Are you going to crash? And what about the VERY end, is he going to have a gun and engage you in gunfire or a physical altercation? These are all things going through your mind while you are driving with tunnel vision to "catch the bad guy."

Today's PSP Memory takes us back to one of my pursuits. September of 1999. Midnight shift on a warm late-summer night. Routes 22 and 981 in New Alexandria Boro, Westmoreland County.

I am working midnight shift with one of my regular partners at the time. There were three of us who rotated every night, two on the road and the third on desk. I enjoyed working with both of them, but it was only for a couple of years, then one transferred closer to his home while the other got off steady midnights. Funny thing about this is that their names were Titley and Askins. One day my then ten-year-old comes to me and says "Hey Dad. Your buddies call you Gabe, right?" I told her yes. "Did you know you ride with Tits and Ass?" I kid you NOT. You cannot make this stuff up!

Anyway, back to the story. It's nearly 3 a.m. The bars had long been closed. The night had quieted down. It was time for a little break, so we rolled into Sheetz at the corner of RT 22 and 981 in New Alexandria for a snack. There were only a handful of customers inside. When I go into an establishment, like all police officers, I like to take a look at everybody. See what they are all up to. I smile and say hello. I try to see if anybody is armed or acting odd. It is very evident when people try to avoid you that they might be up to something.

There is one guy in particular who caught my attention. He would not look at us at all. As I walked over toward him to say hello, he walked away. As I attempted to make eye contact, he would not look at me. Watching him for a few minutes, it was pretty obvious that he was intoxicated.

Trying not to make a scene, I cornered him and engaged him in conversation. I soon discovered that he was HIGHLY intoxicated. He appeared to be alone, so at that point, I wondered if he drove there. You think about many things in a situation like this. To be honest, one of the thoughts I had was not saying a word to him, watch for him to leave, and then arrest him for DUI. After all, he DID drive there in that condition and deserved it. In my mind, however, it was more important to keep him off the road than to make an arrest.

I asked him if he drove here. At this point, there were only two or three people inside and only a couple of cars in the parking lot. He stated that he did not, that his buddy dropped him off and would be picking him up shortly, which seemed kind of far-fetched. I told him that I HOPED that was true, because he should not be anywhere NEAR the road. I told him that if it were NOT true, that he was getting a huge break that he needed to call someone to come get him. I considered arresting him for public drunkenness just for being a danger to himself. Then, I would personally call someone to come and get him, but decided against it, since he had not bothered anybody. Subsequently, my partner and I waited around for a few minutes to make sure he really did have a ride. The customers inside and the cars that were in the lot had gone and were replaced with new ones, so it appeared he really did not drive there.

When nobody came after a while, I talked to him again. Now, my concern was that he was on foot, and was going to try and walk home like this. Route 22 is called "death highway." That could be more dangerous than driving sometimes. He assured me that he indeed had a ride coming, but my “spidey sense” was tingling. I was getting a bad feeling.

Ultimately, we left. I made sure to drive out of sight, then circled back across Route 22. I parked in a parking lot up on the hill where we could watch the entire Sheetz parking lot. After a short while, he finally staggered out the door, barely. He walked away from the store, past all the vehicles toward the corner of the property. It looked like he was going to walk home, so we figured we would stop him before he hit the highway. Investigating a pedestrian accident was the last thing I wanted to do that night.

Right before we got back into the lot, he jumped onto a riding lawn mower, and started heading toward Route 981. Before he could leave the lot, I pulled up behind him and hit the lights on the patrol car. He continued going, pulling out and heading onto 981 South. Seriously? And the pursuit was on!! He turned left onto a side street and continued the first 5 MPH chase in my career. After a short distance, I pulled up alongside him. "Tits" jumped out of the patrol car and tackled him off the lawn mower. The pursuit was over.

We arrested him for DUI AND fleeing and eluding the police, among other things. I transported him back to station for an intoxilyzer test and called for his wife to come pick him up upon his release. When she did, we learned that he was home and wanted to go to the bar. She told him that he was already too drunk and took the keys to ALL their cars. When she went to bed, he apparently took the mower.

He was subsequently convicted of DUI and fleeing and eluding police. Score one for the good guys!

Dale Gabriel is a retired patrol and community services officer with the Pennsylvania State Police. After 25+ years of service, in retirement, he has been working on a book of his many PSP memories. He also coaches a baseball team in a Miracle League for those with special needs. He holds a communication degree with English minor from Saint Vincent College in Western Pennsylvania.

Just Say Thank You

Just Say Thank You
Written by a former Det. Sgt. from the Baltimore City Police Department

To the taxpaying citizen out there, let me tell you about the life of (most) police officers once we are done protecting and serving the community.

We had a life of running down trash-filled alleyways where we prayed we didn’t sprain an ankle or break any bones if we fell. Those times we fell through unsafe floors of vacant dwellings so we could watch and arrest the drug dealers in your neighborhoods. Of course this (sometimes) resulted in an ER visit for stitches, broken bones or a tetanus shot.

All of those times that the suspect that didn’t want to get arrested and fought us.

For those who have never fought for your life let me tell you, you can hardly close your hands for days because of the pain and swelling in your fingers and hands. Some of these actions resulted in dislocated or broken fingers or hands. Of course one of my fights resulted in me getting cut by the suspect with a knife. I have been hit in the head with a cast iron skillet during a domestic or the numerous times I have been kicked in the groin area resulting in a trip to the emergency room. But that is a day at the office for a police officer. We have gotten stitches for various reasons while doing our job and have been sent to the ER for a variety of things. Not to mention the times we have been stuck by uncapped needle from drug addicts. When this happened we get the (Immediate) HIV cocktail that makes us nauseous. For days we worry if we contracted the virus.

We miss many family events because of the job.

Once we leave the job, it’s not over. We have health issues like hypertension and diabetes. Not to mention the surgeries. For me, I have had surgery on my shoulder, knee and numerous epidurals in my back because of the street. I and doing these extremely painful epidurals so I hopefully can avoid getting my back cut open. My knee surgeon said I am about 2 years away from my right knee needing surgery and my left knee will eventually need to be replaced.

We have daily (pain) reminders from our life as a police officer. Some days are harder than others just trying to get out of bed. We also have a shorter life expectancy due to the job.

Worst of all are our brothers and sisters that gave all and didn’t come home at the end of their tour.

But with all that I have listed, I want all to know WE ALL gave 100% to the citizens and taxpayers in the jurisdiction we work. Never forget, we protected property we didn’t own and people we never knew. But we protected this property as if we did own it and protected the citizens of our jurisdiction as if they were our family. Most of all we did this because we chose this job and swore and took an oath to do this and we did!

So if you see a police officer in your travels, just say thank you. This goes a long way!

You’re welcome!

ARE YOU A COWARD?

ARE YOU A COWARD?
By Chris Amos

Are you a coward? Years ago, I was parked next to my sergeant getting paperwork checked when we were interrupted by what sounded like the invasion of Normandy. I’m talking multiple rounds being fired from several different caliber weapons. In fact, so close were the gunshots that we both initially thought we were being ambushed. Realizing the rounds were coming from right around the corner and not intended for us, my sergeant put out a call for backup, before we both activated our lights and sirens and headed toward the gunfire… or so I thought.

I pulled up on the scene to the sounds of screams, I noticed a couple of people on the ground while many others were running in different directions. I quickly scanned the area for anyone armed with a gun. But let me digress for a minute.

In the sixth Chapter of the Book of Judges in the Bible, Israel is being attacked by raiding parties sent by their neighbors, the Midianites, Amalekites and the “people from the East”. Israel cries out to God for help. He sends the most unlikely of heroes, a man by the name of Gideon. Gideon is not onboard with God’s plan as he protests, “O my Lord, how can I save Israel? Indeed, MY CLAN is the WEAKEST in Manasseh, and I AM the LEAST in my father’s house.”Eventually, Gideon puts his own objections and fears to rest, and obeys The Lord, the rest as they say, is history.

God asks four things of Gideon that I believe are relevant to my Brothers and Sister in Blue.

First, CLIMB OUT: At the time Gideon is chosen by God, he is hiding in a winepress, a hole in the ground, threshing wheat, for fear that if he did so in the open, he would be attacked by the raiding party. Keep in mind this raiding party has north of 135,000 men. If Gideon was going to be used of God he would have to leave the relative safety, comfort and predictability of the hole he was in. Think WW I, the war was ultimately won by men who were willing climb out of their own holes in the ground, aka trenches.

Secondly, TEAR DOWN: Once out of his hole, God commanded Gideon to tear down the altar of Baal, a false God, his Father had built. Think of this as a kind of boot camp. Gideon wasn’t immediately thrown into the deep end of faith. No God instructed him to start small, by tearing down those things displeasing to God.

Thirdly, STAND UP: Having obeyed God by climbing out and tearing down, it was now time for Gideon to STAND UP. That is, it was time for Gideon to assemble an army to fight the 135,000-plus army of the enemy. It was time for Gideon to shed his anonymity and go public with his intent to confront an army that dwarfed the size of his own. You will want to read Judges 6, to see how exactly his army of volunteer Israelites “grew” from 32 soldiers to 300 soldiers.

Finally, Gideon was instructed to “RUN TO THE ROAR”: Gideon developed a plan to attack at night an army that outnumbered his own by a mere 450 to 1. In obedience, and with, by this point, an unwavering faith, Gideon did as instructed and would go on to experience one of the most improbable victories in history.

I can’t help but think someone reading this is facing a threat to his or her marriage and/or family. Maybe you are being pressured to compromise your own integrity. Financially, you are in a bad way and you are considering a solution to your situation that goes against departmental policy, or worse yet is illegal. Perhaps, because of a multitude of problems you are contemplating suicide. Friends, Gideon provides us with the roadmap out of the wilderness.

STEP ONE – CLIMB OUT of your own hole. That place of relative comfort, safety and predictability. Your hole could come in the form of a bottle or pill. It could be a place of few expectations and even fewer responsibilities; a place in which the only thing that matters is yourself. Your dreams, your plans, your agenda, your pleasure, etc. With God’s help, and He is willing and able, you need to risk climbing out of your hole.

STEP TWO – TEAR DOWN those things in your life that you know are not pleasing to God. Those people, places, or possessions that have become idols in your own life and anything that has become #1 in your life above God. Maybe it’s your own ego, pride, a habit, addiction, or hobby, working out, running, a craving for recognition, praise, atta boys. Ask God, He will show you what needs to be torn down.

STEP THREE – STAND UP for your marriage, your family, your own reputation, for The Lord. We are surrounded by those things that seek to tear us down – Jesus has another plan in mind, STAND UP!

STEP FOUR – RUN TO THE ROAR, that is run to that very thing that Satan desires will lead to your demise. I’m not talking about taking needless, foolish risks at work. Of course not! But I am saying we need to confront and defeat those “Goliaths” or giants in our lives that have us cowering in fear as we hide in the holes in the ground in our own lives.

Speaking of cowering in fear, remember the shots fired call I mentioned earlier? As I arrived on scene, the stench of gunpowder hanging in the air, my eyes darted left then right scanning the scene for potential threats. It was then that I noticed my sergeant was nowhere to be found. He was, in fact, hiding hunkered down in his squad car blocks away from the danger. He would eventually arrive, I figured he was about the tenth unit to do so. That was honestly the only time, during almost 27 years as a cop that I can say I saw, or didn’t see would be more accurate, a coward in action.

Friends, I began this article with a question, “Are you a coward?” You may be the Alpha in your whole department, but friend if you are hiding in your own hole from responsibilities and expectations outside of policing, you are a coward. The great news is God can and does save cowards. The bad news is, God rarely if ever, can use a coward to make any meaningful or significant impact on those around him or her. Friends, I challenge you, as I do myself, to CLIMB OUT, TEAR DOWN, STAND UP, and RUN TO THE ROAR! God will be with you, every step of the way!

 See you at the finish line!

Chris Amos is a retired officer and former spokesperson for the Norfolk Virginia Police Department. He is currently the pastor at Chr1st Fellowship Church in Norfolk. He is married for over 30 years and is the proud father of three children, two of whom are police officers. He serves as the volunteer Chaplain for Norfolk Police Dept. and Norfolk Sheriff’s Office.

Remembrance - Police Officer Emilia Rennhack

Remembrance - Police Officer Emilia Rennhack
Article & Artwork by Jonny Castro

View fullsize

On June 28, 2024, off-duty NYPD Police Officer Emilia Rennhack stopped at a nail salon in Deer Park, Long Island to get her nails done. She was supposed to attend the wedding of a fellow officer later that evening. While inside, an SUV being operated at a high rate of speed by a drunken driver, crashed into the store front and came to rest in the back of the building. The violent collision took the life of Officer Rennhack and three others, including the owner of the salon. Nine people ranging from ages 12 to 55 were also hospitalized with injuries. The driver was arrested and charged with DWI.

30-year old Officer Emilia Rennhack was a six-year veteran of the New York Police Department and was assigned to the 102nd Precinct in Queens. She leaves behind a loving husband who also serves as a detective with the NYPD’s 102 PCT. The pair had just gotten married last fall. She was remembered by her colleagues as a beacon of professionalism and warmth, and was always ready to lend a helping hand or a comforting word. During her distinguished career, the young officer had amassed a remarkable 68 felony arrests and 95 misdemeanor arrests. She will never be forgotten.

ANTI-SEMITISM: THE ESCALATING CONFLICT

Editor’s Note: Pastor Amos wrote this essay in November of 2023 concerning the rise in anti-Semitism. It is a prophetic message written six months before the tsunami of anti-Semitism we now see rocking academia. The BLUE Magazine and Pastor Amos thank the NYPD and officer’s nationwide for quelling unlawful assemblies promoting hate.

On October 7, 2023 Israel was invaded by up to 3,000 terrorists, both trained HAMAS members and civilians that joined in the brutal attacks against soldiers, men, women, children, infants, and the elderly. 1,400 were killed that day; an additional 245 were taken hostage. Overlooked by many, was the fact that among those killed were 58 police officers. Men and women, who with little to no warning, did what cops do, they advanced toward the threat confronting an enemy that was far greater in number and better armed. Men and women of law enforcement, unknown to the world, but being hailed as heroes throughout Israel.

Fifty-eight police officers killed in the line of duty in one day. Let me try to put that into perspective.According to the DOJ’s Bureau of Justice statistics [10/22/23], over 80% of the America’s law enforcement departments have 50 or fewer sworn officers. 67% have fewer than 25 officers. In other words, the 58 law enforcement officers killed in the line of duty in Israel on 10/7/23 would be the equivalent of entire departments in many US towns and counties.

Since that horrific day, cases of anti-Semitism have exploded around the world. Demonstrations have surfaced in many of America’s major cities reminiscent of the 2020 “Summer of Love” riots that broke out targeting lawenforcement. As the days pass by it seems the protests, and many of the HAMAS sympathizers participating, seem to be getting more confrontational and violent. The riots occurring in Europe are more explosive than those here, at least for now.

The question many ask is why is there such a hatred for the Jews? The hatred isn’t focused on Prime Minister Netanyahu, the Israeli government, or even the Israeli Defense Force [IDF]. No, it is much broader. It includes the residents of Israel, Jew, Arab, and secular. It also encompasses Jews in general, wherever they may live. There are many theories as to why, my own theory is less obvious than most and yet I think it has been hiding in plain sight. I’m talking about a hatred that is spiritual in nature, while physical in its manifestation.

A quick history lesson might help. Abraham of the Old Testament had two sons, Ishmael and Isaac. Ishmael would go on to be the Father of what we know today to be the Arab nations on the world, most of which are not at war with Israel and have no desire to join the war against Israel. Abraham’s son Isaac would have twin boys, Esau and Jacob. Esau was born first, entitling him to all the responsibilities and perks of being the first-born son. That was a HUGE deal at the time. The younger Jacob, whose name would be changed by God to Israel, deceived his elderly, nearly blind, Father Isaac into granting him the blessing that rightfully was Esau’s. Upon discovering this, Esau was furious and sought to kill his younger brother. In time, Jacob would plead for his life and Esau would relent, sparing the lives of Jacob and his family, though the seeds of resentment and hatred had taken root.The damage had been done. Esau would have a grandson, named Amalek. Amalek watered and tended to the seeds of resentment and hatred until they became the driving force of his life and that of his descendants, who would grow to hate Jacob’s descendants with a burning demonic hatred. Speaking of Jacob’s descendants, Jacob would have 12 sons, who would become the patriarchs of the 12 tribes of Israel.Do you see what’s happening? A demonic hatred for Israel is taking shape.

Hang in there with me, I am going somewhere with this. Fast forward a few hundred years to the book of Esther in the Old Testament. The villain in that book is a man named Haman, a descendant of Amalek. He is the first person in the Bible that called for the genocide or eradication of the Jewish people; men, women, children, everyone. God, using Esther, would intervene, saving the Jewish people from complete destruction. Haman would be executed for his actions. Haman was from Persia or modern-day Iran. If he were alive today, he would be one of many Mullahs in Iran calling for the, you guessed it, eradication of the Jewish people from Israel and the world.

Which brings us to October 7th and the days and weeks that have followed. This hatred for the Jews or what I call the “Spirit of Amalek” is alive and well. In fact, we are witnessing it sweeping the entire world, as mostly young angry protesters find themselves experiencing a hatred for the Jews that is illogical, not to mention irrational in nature. Ironically, many of America’s left leaning progressive Jews are now finding themselves the targets of those who they thought were their friends and allies as they protested together, arm in arm, against law enforcement just three short years ago.

What they missed then, and the world is missing now, is that a new anti-Semitism is being born, demonic in nature, global in reach, deadly in expression. This is a manifestation of the “Spirit of Amalek” towards the Jewish people, in Israel and beyond. We have seen incidents of Jews being assaulted, murdered, their homes marked with the star of David, their businesses firebombed around the world.

How does this impact you? Realize you have company on the Thin Blue Line; the people of Israel and Jews around the world. It’s no coincidence the Israeli Flag is a blue Star of David on a white background, bracketed by a thin blue line both above and beneath the Star. Ironically, at least in America, some of law enforcement’s greatest critics three years ago are now finding themselves very much in need of those whom they were so critical of. Truly, The Lord moves in mysterious ways.

What must you do? Understand the spiritual nature behind the hatred, anger, and violence. Stand up for Israel and the Jewish Community in your jurisdiction. Realize the actions taken by those under the “Spirit of Amalek” will be irrational. I firmly believe America will experience, both lone wolf attacks and organized, well planned, attacks like Israel experienced on 10/7 and in America on 9/11. The question is not if but when, where, by how many, and what will be the extent of the destruction inflicted.

Having been called by God [Romans 13] you, as a Law Enforcement Officer, will play an important role in keeping “The Spirit of Amalek” in check in your corner of America. I pray that we will all be given eyes to see and ears to hear what both God and the enemy of our souls is up to. I pray for your safety and boldness, as you confront the “Spirit of Amalek”.

Friends, you are, whether it feels like it or not, on the front line of an escalating conflict. Know this, our power, our strength, our ability to win this battle comes from Jesus Christ. If you haven’t considered Jesus as The Savior and Lord of your life, I can’t urge you strongly enough to seriously consider doing so. As for me and my house, we have long ago chosen to bow the knee to Jesus and to stand with Israel! Brothers and Sisters in blue, all of Heaven is watching. What will you do?

Chris Amos is a retired officer and former spokesperson for the Norfolk Virginia Police Department. He is currently the pastor at Chr1st Fellowship Church in Norfolk. He is married for over 30 years and is the proud father of three children, two of whom are police officers. He serves as the volunteer Chaplain for Norfolk Police Dept. and Norfolk Sheriff’s Office.

Violence Prevention & Mental Illness: Unraveling the Complex Connection

Violence Prevention & Mental Illness: Unraveling the Complex Connection
By: Joel E. Gordon

Mass shootings and violent acts continue to shake communities worldwide, leaving devastation and questions in their wake. As society grapples with understanding these heinous acts, one common question arises: Is there a link between mass shooters, violent acts and mental illness? In this article, we delve into this complex topic, examining the intertwining factors and shedding light on the reality behind the headlines.

Contrary to popular belief, the vast majority of individuals with mental illnesses are not violent. In fact, studies consistently show that those battling mental health issues are more likely to be victims of violence rather than perpetrators. It is crucial to dispel the myth that mental illness directly leads to acts of mass shootings, as it perpetuates stigma and hampers our ability to address the true root causes.

While mental illness alone does not predict violent behavior, it is essential to recognize that certain risk factors can increase the likelihood of someone with mental health challenges engaging in violence. These risk factors may include:

1.      Untreated or undertreated mental illness: Lack of access to or compliance with appropriate mental health treatment can exacerbate symptoms and increase the risk of dangerous behavior.

2.      Substance abuse: When substance abuse co-occurs with mental illness, the risk of violence may escalate due to impaired judgment, altered perception and increased impulsivity.

3.      Previous violent behavior: History of violence, regardless of mental health status, is a significant predictor of future aggression.

4.      Social isolation and marginalization: Feeling excluded, lonely or marginalized can fuel anger and resentment, potentially leading to violent acts as a means of revenge or attention-seeking.

While it is critical to acknowledge the role of mental health in the broader context of mass shootings, it is equally important not to overlook the societal factors that contribute to such acts. These factors include:

1.      Access to firearms: Easy access to firearms can significantly escalate the risk of violence. Responsible gun ownership is vital.

2.      Media influence: Desperate for attention and infamy, some mass shooters seek to make headlines. Sensationalized media coverage can inadvertently contribute to copycat incidents.

3.      Social contagion: Mass shootings can trigger a contagious effect, inspiring others to commit similar acts. This contagion factor is amplified through the rapid spread of information via social media and online platforms.

To effectively address the issue of mass shootings, a comprehensive approach is crucial. This approach should encompass:

1.      Improved mental health services: Enhancing access to affordable and quality mental health services can ensure individuals receive appropriate treatment, reducing the risk of violence.

2.      Early identification and intervention: Recognizing warning signs and providing timely intervention can make a significant difference in diverting potentially violent individuals toward appropriate support systems.

3.      Promotion of social connectedness: Creating inclusive communities that foster social connections and support networks can alleviate social isolation and reduce the risk of violent behavior.

4.      Responsible control measures: Implementing control policies that lawfully balance individual rights with public safety are also in need of further exploration.

My own experience as a law enforcement official has been that when I encountered an individual who clearly seemed to be a danger to themselves or others and showed a propensity toward violence, mental health practitioners routinely requested criminalization through a request for legal charges of a criminal nature, or when forced to perform in-person evaluation, would often release the individual untreated.

While the connection between mass shooters, violent acts and mental illness is complex, it is essential to dispel misconceptions and approach the issue from a holistic perspective. By focusing on early intervention, better and more responsive mental health support, and addressing societal factors, we can work toward a safer future minimizing the risk of violence and protecting our communities. Remember, combating the stigma associated with mental illness while addressing the multifaceted nature of violence and mass shootings is crucial for progress in prevention.

Joel E. Gordon, Managing Editor of BLUE Magazine, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

MANAGING EDITOR'S POINT OF VIEW

So, what is a magazine? Coming from the Arabic word makhzan, meaning ‘storehouse,’ the term magazine was originally used to describe books as they were considered to be storehouses of knowledge. Eventually, the word came to refer to published periodicals like the storehouse of knowledge that is the BLUE Magazine!

The BLUE Magazine writers, new and existing alike, are some of the most talented in sharing wisdom and knowledge with our readers. Honing our writing skills, our contributors are masters of concise thought sharing while avoiding any double meanings or mistaken interpretations.

Please welcome some new writers… Marty Katz, Stan Popovich, and renowned attorney Lance LoRusso to our BLUE Magazine family. When your badge is wrongfully threatened, Lance is a go-to expert for his knowledge and expertise in your defense. His inaugural article for us appears in this edition of the magazine.

We are focusing attention in this issue on Violence Prevention and Mental Illness through our cover story as we seek to unravel the complex connection. Companion articles by Joe Pangaro, Understanding the Kill List brings attention to an important red flag for law enforcement and others. Leonard Sipes explores Can The Justice System Help Violent People With Mental Health Issues? Ken Dye writes Making the Case FOR Excited Delirium. All are must-read articles along with many other articles of interest and benefit.

Sadly, we have lost one of our own. BLUE Magazine mourns the loss of Baltimore City Police Major Wesley Wise (Ret.) who passed away earlier this year. In addition to being a prolific writer, after his service to Baltimore, he became a computer system trainer for the Kauai Hawaii Police Department. His reach and influence was far and wide. He is missed by his family, friends and all of us here at the BLUE Magazine. Be sure to read our tribute to him in this issue.
As always, reach out to us, share your thoughts, and continue to give us your wisdom. We are here for you as we collectively navigate the often tough world around us together.

Joel E. Gordon
Managing Editor

Making the Case FOR Excited Delirium

Making the Case FOR Excited Delirium
By: Ken Dye

Excited delirium, as a medical diagnosis has been banned in California.  Can other states and/or the American Medical Association and the Department of  Health and Human Services be far behind in striking EX as a reason for an in-custody death?

You get a call. A person is standing on top of a car screaming at passersby.  He has a machete and swings it violently.  You and several other cars are at the scene.  What to do?

The onlookers want the police officers on scene to “Do something.”

The weirded-out subject is in no mood to listen to calm and reasoned conversation.  De-escalation techniques fail … miserably.

As officers attempt to gain some kind of communication, the person jumps off the car, and in the process of doing so loses his machete.

He is now chasing after pedestrians…the police officers, having already called for an ambulance, must move.

And they do.  The officers “swarm” the suspect.

They are met with an aggressive and violently resisting subject.  The officers TASER the person and use chemical agents to gain control.  Nothing seems to work.

The subject has superhuman strength and is impervious to pain.

The officers finally get control of the person and he’s rushed to a trauma hospital.

Whilse at the hospital a paramedic tells the attending physician the patient has had Ketamine injected.  The medical professional is trained on when, how and the quantity of the drug to administer.  He also tells the attending physician the in-custody person’s temperature is 115 degrees and his blood pressure is 200/160.  The classic telltale signs of out-of-control drug abuse.

The subject admitted to use of cocaine, PCP and meth.  After the admission, the patient calms down for a short time where he calmly speaks about the quantity of drugs taken during the last 24 hours.

The patient then dies.  He dies from what?  It’s not “Excited Delirium”… then just what the hell is it?

Pathologists are reluctant to use EX as a cause of death.  OK, how about self-induced drug intoxication that overwhelmed the drug abuser?

Often, police officers are the faux bad guys.  Medical, political officials and chiefs can be the biggest critics when it comes to an in-custody death.

The fact is that people die in police custody.  Usually from excessive drug use that causes the body to shut down.  Police officers desire to be able and efficient.  If the EX diagnosis is no longer valid, those that dispute the diagnosis better come up with a plan to deal with these out-of-control subjects … and quit using law enforcement as the whipping boy for these deaths.

Ken Dye is the author of 5 books about crime, cops and bad guys in the St. Louis area.  He Blogs under “Cops Perspective” and has over 20,000 followers. Ken served with the St. Louis County Police Department for 13 years and finished his LE career with the Illinois Criminal Justice Authority as the administrator for the statewide MEG’s and Narcotics Task Forces.

Can The Justice System Help Violent People With Mental Health Issues?

Can The Justice System Help Violent People With Mental Health Issues?
By: Leonard Adam Sipes, Jr.

This article addresses programs designed to assist offenders with serious mental health problems, from laws designed to stem violence or mass shootings to the rehabilitation of criminal offenders.

No one is questioning the efficacy of mental health treatment for the general public. The challenge is criminals with a history of violence or people in the community threatening violence or a mass shooting. 

When I was the director of public information for the Maryland Department of Public Safety (a combined law enforcement and corrections agency), I was asked by the media why the state didn’t do more to “rehabilitate” prison inmates or those on parole and probation. As I was new in the position, I put that question to the four commissioners in charge of our correctional operations.

“Leonard, most offenders come from abusive family backgrounds with massive substance use and serious mental illness. Nothing short of a substantial intervention will get them to mental competency and sobriety.”

So I asked what was standing in the way of massive interventions. Wouldn’t it make sense to assist them? As one stated, “There isn’t enough money because there’s little proof that programs work, especially for those seriously afflicted who have violent backgrounds.”

Their replies come to mind when I read a recent article from the New York Times about Kendra’s Law and treating violent people in the community which has been cited as a national model for involuntary treatment programs. The investigation found that people under Kendra’s Law orders “have been accused of committing more than 380 subway shovings, beatings, stabbings and other violent acts in the past five years alone, more than a third of which took place in New York City. In addition, more than 90 people have killed themselves while subject to Kendra’s Law orders in the past decade. Eighty-five percent of the attempts to use Kendra’s Law to hospitalize people against their will in New York City did not result in hospital admissions.” Critics of Kendra’s Law acknowledge that there’s insufficient money for correctional treatment.

There’s not a prison warden in the country who’s against treatment programs while understanding that mental health is the core of rehabilitation efforts. It doesn’t matter whether it’s getting a GED or bricklaying or preparing for life on the outside, having a healthy relationship with yourself or others is vital. 

Programs for inmates create stable environments within correctional facilities. Inmates who are meaningfully engaged in programs behave better. Programs create safer and saner environments for correctional staff and when you realize that most inmates have current or past convictions for crimes of violence, keeping prisons safe becomes primary goals.

Per the Bureau of Justice Statistics, 78 percent of inmates had previous incarcerations. Forty-two percent had 5-10 or more incarcerations. 62 percent were violent. 66 percent of male inmates are serving time for violent crimes. If one looks at criminal histories, the percentage of those in prison for crimes of violence easily reaches 70-80 percent.

The simple answer for the lack of money for correctional treatment is, quite simply, that they have questionable track records of success.

There’s not a chief of police who disagrees with mental health interventions for people with potential violence issues, but they understand that there are endless complexities to getting a person into treatment, keeping them there and making sure that they get the right treatment.

Even when states do the right thing regarding mental health programs for potentially violent people in the community, counties may not comply because of a lack of funding.

I sat with one of our correctional commissioners in a facility housing hundreds of inmates charged with murder or serious violent crimes. We were gaining intelligence for a governor’s crime summit. It was just he and I. The inmates spoke openly.

We were told that violence was a necessary component in their lives. They said that being scary-violent and the willingness to use violence was in their best interest. It kept them and their family and possessions safe. “You don’t get it, Mr. Sipes, being violent is a good thing.”

When we asked questions about their backgrounds, a reputation for mental illness was a plus. If you’re known as unpredictable and willing to use violence, people keep their distance. They are careful about what they say or do regarding you. The inmates we spoke to believe that the crazier, the better.

They describe being raised by absent or uncaring parents who engaged in abuse or neglect, that their neighborhoods were dangerous, and that substance abuse and gangs were logical outcomes that offered protection.

In short, they made dysfunction something they willingly embraced. They didn’t expect to live beyond the age of 25. How do you successfully treat someone with that view of themselves?

So are most correctional or community programs doomed to failure? Whether it’s “assisting” mentally ill people in the community or the correctional system, the interventions need dramatically more funding. We impose Red Flag (firearm confiscation) laws that cops don’t have the person power to enforce (thousands of police officers have left the job). We pile on responsibilities (i.e., school security, mass shooting prevention, keeping communities safe) when cities are stating that they have lost hundreds of cops.

I’m guessing that most in the criminal rehabilitation field would insist that this finding applies to their programs as well, which is why the vast majority of offenders are rearrested or incarcerated upon release.

The collective literature states that programs for offenders either do not work or do not work well. Yet, daily, I read about programs that are providing wonderful results.

States have different interpretations of released inmate recidivism. Some states are merely changing the rules of bad or criminal behavior that ensure that their recidivism rates decrease.

Most offenders have mental health backgrounds.

In the final analysis, we might be able to save the government billions of dollars and cut violence considerably “if” the interventions were successful. With such a massive payoff, why are governments so reluctant to properly fund interventions?

It’s because violent criminal offenders can be extremely difficult to assist. Many in parole and probation describe them as at war with the world; they have chips on their shoulders the size of Montana. It’s because criminal offenders see crime to be a logical path. It’s because, regardless of what advocates suggest, the results of programs suck (an opinion most inmates embrace).

Society insists that people in the community threatening violence who have mental health issues be addressed by mental health providers and law enforcement and both lack the resources and staff to comply.

Advocates constantly tell us that the vast majority of people with serious mental health problems will never commit violence. Where is the data that allows us to distinguish between the truly dangerous and those not?

Interventions for the seriously mentally or emotionally ill with violent backgrounds (or those threatening violence) need exceptional research and funding. Unless that happens, little will change.

Leonard Adam Sipes, Jr.is a retired federal senior spokesperson. A former Adjunct Associate Professor of Criminology and Public Affairs - University of Maryland. Former advisor to the “McGruff-Take a Bite Out of Crime” national media campaign. Past police officer. Aspiring drummer. Operator of CrimeinAmerica.net. His book based on thirty-five years of criminal justice public relations,” Success with the Media: Everything You Need to Survive Reporters and Your Organization” is available at Amazon and additional booksellers. He can also be found @ leonardsipes.com