The Evolution of Police Videos in Law Enforcement

By: Joel E. Gordon

Body cameras and dash cams have changed policing. They started as simple tools for safety. Now, they build a bridge between officers and communities. Over 50% of U.S. police departments use body cams, according to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. These devices record interactions in real time. They help sort fact from fiction. Police videos trace back to basic tools. They have grown with tech. This shift helps officers and the public alike.

Fixed cameras in patrol cars marked the start. In the 1980s, these recorded from dashboards. They caught basic scenes but missed close action.

Then came portable gear. After the 2014 Ferguson protests, body cams surged. The U.S. Department of Justice pushed for them. By 2016, about 40% of large agencies had them, per DOJ reports. Small towns followed suit. This boom came from demands for proof in tense stops.

These cameras clip to uniforms. They film from the officer's view. No more he-said-she-said stories.

Dash cams lead the pack. They mount in cars and film roads and talks. High-definition lenses catch details day or night. Body cams offer more. They record hands-free with wide angles. Some add GPS tags to clips. Drones join in too. They hover above for bird's-eye views in big scenes.

AI steps up the game. It spots faces or flags fights in real time. Journals like Police Chief note these boosts. Footage stays sharp, even in rain or dark. This tech makes videos reliable tools.

• Dash cams: Auto-start on lights or sirens.

• Body cams: Battery lasts full shifts.

• Drones: Fly safe with remote pilots.

Videos replay real events. Departments watch them after shifts. This refines moves and cuts errors.In reviews, trainers spot weak spots. A tense call might show better talk skills. Simulations use clips to practice de-escalation. Officers learn to calm crowds without force.

For better training, departments can do these steps:

1. Log all footage in a safe system.

2. Review with teams weekly.

3. Tie lessons to policy updates.

This approach saves lives. It builds skills that stick.

Videos raise tough questions. Who sees them? When do they stay private? Laws try to balance this. The Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) opens doors. It lets people request federal files. States have their own rules, like sunshine laws.

People deserve privacy. Videos might show kids or victims. Redactions blur faces or homes.

Fake clips spread easy online. Real ones need proof. Chain-of-custody tracks each step from camera to court. Officers seal devices right away. Tech firms add watermarks. This fights edits.

Viewers, check these:

• Look at metadata for dates.

• Stick to news or official sites.

• Spot jumps in action as red flags.

Solid checks keep facts straight.

Cases teach hard truths. Many cities now require body cams. New York mandates them for all patrols.

Reforms include quick reviews. Bans on rough tactics spread.

Advocates, try this:

• Gather local video data.

• Meet council members.

• Push for audits yearly.

Change starts with action. Trust grows or fades with clips. They show real work. Surveys back this up. Open releases build faith. The NYPD shares clips on its site. This lets folks see daily duties. Routine posts prove fairness. No cover-ups erode doubt.

Agencies, share more:

• Post training vids.

• Explain big incidents.

• Invite questions online.

Steps like these connect people.

Addressing Misinformation and Public Perception

Short clips twist truths. A punch out of context looks bad. Full videos clear the air.

• Watch whole footage.

• Read news from both sides.

• Share facts, not rage.

Context fights lies. Police videos transform how we see law enforcement. From old dash cams to AI boosts, they trace a path to better days. Legal rules balance access and privacy. They build trust by opening doors and fighting fakes. New tech promises more insights, if handled right.

Key points stick: Videos demand accountability. Push for open policies. Use them to heal rifts between cops and neighbors.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Police Shootings at Moving Vehicles: Legal Precedents, Tactical Realities, and Public Scrutiny

By: Joel E. Gordon

In 2023 alone, over 1,100 people died from police shootings in the U.S., and a chunk of those involved moving cars. Picture this: an officer chases a speeding driver through city streets, heart pounding, as the vehicle swerves wildly. Was the car a deadly threat, or just a means to flee? These moments test the line between safety and overreach. We face a tough balance here—protecting officers from real dangers while ensuring force stays fair.

Laws around police use of force aim to keep things reasonable, but vehicles add a twist. Officers must prove they faced real danger before pulling the trigger.

Courts lean on Graham v. Connor from 1989 to judge if force fits the threat. That case says officers act on what they see in the moment, not hindsight. For moving cars, "objectively reasonable" means asking: Did the vehicle pose immediate harm? In Tennessee v. Garner from 1985, the Supreme Court limited deadly force against fleeing suspects unless they threaten lives. A car barreling toward an officer changes everything—it becomes like a 3,000-pound bullet. Judges now weigh speed, direction, and if the driver aimed to hit someone. This standard evolves with cases, pushing for proof of clear peril.

Back in the day, cops could shoot any fleeing felon. But Garner ended that broad rule. Today, deadly force needs a deadly threat, even in chases. A driver speeding away isn't enough; they must endanger others directly. Think of it as a red line: If the car rams toward a crowd or officer, shots might justify. Courts look at intent—did the suspect gun the engine at people? Without that, force crosses into excess. This shift cut down unjust killings, but it leaves gray areas in fast pursuits.

Federal law sets the floor, but police departments often raise the bar. The Constitution demands reasonableness, yet many agencies ban shooting at moving cars unless lives hang in the balance. For example, the LAPD's policy requires officers to avoid fire if the vehicle alone is the target. Training stresses this gap—cops learn constitutional basics plus local rules. Some places mandate de-escalation first, like calling in backups. These policies aim to dodge lawsuits and rebuild community faith. Still, they vary by city, creating uneven standards across the country.

On the streets, vehicles turn chases into chaos. Officers train to spot when a car shifts from getaway tool to weapon. Accuracy drops fast in motion, so choices matter.

A car hits like a truck in a fight—pure force. Training flags scenarios like a driver veering into pedestrians or charging at cops. If it rams a patrol car, that's assault with a deadly weapon. Officers assess distance and speed: At 60 mph, impact kills. Crowded areas amp the risk; one wrong swerve endangers bystanders. Real cases show drivers using cars to attack, like plowing through barriers. Spotting this shift saves lives, but split seconds decide.

Shooting from a speeding cruiser? Hits land one in ten times, tops. Bullets veer with the sway, risking stray shots into homes or traffic. "Weapon containment" means holding fire until safe—park and aim if you can. Officers face wind, bumps, and adrenaline blur. It's like aiming a slingshot from a rollercoaster. Departments push steady positions over wild gunfire, cutting collateral damage. Yet, fear of harm pushes some to shoot anyway.

Why not skip bullets? PIT maneuvers nudge cars off the road safely. Spike strips pop tires without a chase's end. Drones or GPS trackers follow from afar, letting pursuits cool. These tools work best in teams— one car blocks, another deploys strips. Less-lethal options like beanbag rounds stop drivers short of lethal shots. Cities like Seattle swear by them, dropping vehicle shootings by half. Training drills these swaps, making gunfire the last resort.

Famous incidents light up the debate on police shooting at moving cars. They show how evidence sways courts and crowds. Video often tips the scales.

Take the 2016 Philando Castile case in Minnesota. During a traffic stop, Castile reached for his ID, but fear led to shots in his car. The dashboard cam showed no aggressive move, yet the officer claimed threat. Courts ruled the force unreasonable, highlighting panic over proof. Another: The 2020 Breonna Taylor raid, where a car chase precursor ended in tragedy. No direct shots at a moving vehicle, but it fueled talks on pursuit risks. These cases stress intent evidence—like dash footage proving or debunking danger.

Vehicle incidents make up about 5-10% of all officer-involved shootings, per Mapping Police Violence data through 2025. That's roughly 50-100 cases yearly, mostly in urban spots like LA or Chicago. Southern states see more due to longer pursuits. Overall use-of-force drops 15% since body cams rolled out, but car chases lag. Black drivers face these stops twice as often, sparking equity cries. Trends point to fewer fatalities with better tech, yet hot spots persist.

Cameras capture the blur of a chase like nothing else. They show if a car truly threatened or if shots flew too soon. In reviews, video sways 70% of decisions, per DOJ stats. Prosecutors use it to charge or clear officers fast. Public eyes footage too, fueling protests or support. Dash cams pair with body cams for full views, cutting disputes. But angles miss details, so experts still debate. Overall, they push for clearer calls in vehicle threats.

After shots ring out, questions flood in. How do we check if force fit? Training and reviews build better habits; internal affairs jumps in right away. They pull logs on speed, distance, and witness words. Boards replay the scene: Was the car closing in? Experts measure threat levels frame by frame. Officers face psych evaluations too, spotting stress flaws. Most cases clear if policy holds, but 20% lead to discipline. This process ensures fairness, weeding out bad calls. Families get reports, closing loops on trust.

Drills mimic real chases to sharpen skills. Close-quarters stops practice disarming threats without fire. Aggressive maneuvers teach PIT timing on mock tracks. VR sims throw in rain or crowds for stress tests. Departments run these weekly, cutting errors by 30%. Focus on angles: When does a swerve become a lunge? New hires log hours in cars, building gut calls. It's like flight school for cops—prep beats regret.

Behavioral pros say to slow down pursuits to think more clearly. One analyst notes: "Back off, track later—lives first." Legal voices push policy tweaks for non-violent flees. Under stress, breaths calm the trigger finger. De-escalation works in 80% of stops, per studies. Experts call for team calls over solo heroics. Blending calm with readiness saves officers and suspects alike.

Police shooting at moving vehicles sits at a crossroads. Law demands proof of danger, tactics stress smart choices, and the public wants proof of restraint. We've seen how cases and cams shape views, while training bridges gaps. Clear rules and honest reviews can ease tensions. In the end, it's about protecting everyone without excess force.

Key Takeaways for Legal Clarity and Procedural Justice

• Prove imminent threat: Officers need evidence the vehicle endangers lives right then—no guesses.

• Prefer non-lethal tools: Use PIT or strips first to avoid bullets in most chases.

• Rely on video proof: Body cams clarify decisions, helping courts and communities agree.

• Train for stress: Regular simulations build habits that keep force measured and fair.

Stay informed, stay safe.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

It Was Inevitable

The recent use of deadly force by an Immigration and Customs Enforcement agent that occurred in Minneapolis, Minnesota has thrown the nation into widespread protests once again. Recall that Minneapolis was the site of the death of George Floyd who died after coming into contact with Minneapolis police officers.

You know how this works. After the death of someone at the hands of a law enforcement officer, subversives on the American left begin organizing staged protests. They are able to summon a mob of people to show up at moments notice. They are well funded. The goal is to overwhelm government’s ability to adequately respond our counter. Government operates from a reactive position early on and usually for the entire event. Media shows up and films events from the mob’s perspective. One that portrays the mob as peaceful people just out exercising their first amendment right to protest. Any footage they can capture that shows a first responder using any kind of force is exploited without objectivity or balanced descriptions. The response to this shooting by an ICE agent is no different.

This use of force was going to happen and not because these agents are itching to use force. In my view ICE agents have been putting up with too much for too long. They have absorbed assaults, they have been doxxed, they and their families have been subjected to threats, they have been made into villains and all with no assertive response. That is not an effective counter to this violence. These groups are reservoirs of hate and violence. Their goal is to foment violence and to initiate contact with agents. They want the physical fight. These are not your typical peaceful protestors regardless of how they or the accomplice media defines them. These are well organized and well funded insurrectionists using guerrilla warfare type tactics used to topple governments in third world countries. I am encouraged that President Trump has indicated that he may invoke the Insurrection Act in Minneapolis if he has to, in order to keep the peace. They want to burn our republic down. This is a rebellion. It is important to identify this for what it is, otherwise, the wrong tactics and resources will be applied. The mob has seen that the response so far from the government has been tepid at best.

Assaults against these officers has risen 1300% since these operations began about a year ago. Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Justice have issued numerous warnings about holding people accountable. In one instance, a memo warned the agitators not to cross the red-line. What and where exactly is the red line? This mob has not only crossed the red line, but they have also sprinted past it and still no effective counter response.

Asking ICE agents to fulfill their mission in the face of this opposition makes their’s an impossible task. They are getting no help for the most part from state and local law enforcement because local Democrat politicians have turned this into a political fight against the federal government. Local law enforcement would be very helpful in covering ICE agents flanks as they are attacked as they search for and arrest illegals. Instead, ICE must use their own limited resources that thins their ranks not to mention that these agents are not really trained to do that type of enforcement. We are talking about mob or riot control.

So, we end up with a situation where ICE agents must resort the use force to protect themselves because the mob continues to raise the ante. Irresponsible political rhetoric has dehumanized these agents. This sends a message that it is all right to attack and assault agents.

Agents from Immigration and Customs Enforcement now realize that they are going to have to use a higher level of force to keep themselves safe. That is job one. In four different instances agents who were under attack have applied deadly force, twice in Portland and twice in Minneapolis. In one of the incidents in Minneapolis an agent shot and killed a woman who weaponized her motor vehicle and drove at the agent after being given several orders to stop her car and get out. It is a classic case of not complying with a lawful order given by an officer. It has been reported that she had received anti-ICE training. Really? Who is conducting this training and who is funding it? This is part of the intelligence gathering operation that I hope is going on to dismantle the infrastructure of this insurrection

I have reviewed numerous videos of the incident. While that is only one piece of the investigation, I am qualified to make some assessments early on. I have investigated many officer uses of deadly force as a detective with the Milwaukee Police Department. I have interviewed involved officers and made conclusions to the local district attorney reviewing the shooting to decide if it was justified or not.

I do not want to hear from the cop hating group, talking heads on television or news reporters. None of these folks know what they are talking about. The only thing that matters to determine whether it was justified is the legal standard. That legal standard is codified in a landmark Supreme Court Decision named Graham versus Conner. In a nutshell it says that officers are faced with making split second decisions under circumstances that are tense, uncertain and rapidly evolving. The officer’s use of force cannot be judged under the lense of 20/20 hindsight. It further says that determinations of its reasonableness must be made under the objective reasonableness of a law enforcement officer on the scene who used the force, not what you or I should have done or would have done but what that officer did taking all the facts and circumstance into account.

Taking into count what the Graham v Conner finding says, it is easy for me to determine at this stage that the ICE agent using deadly force did so to save himself from death or great bodily harm of being struck or run over by a car. It was justified.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of America’s Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

The Unbreakable Shield: Mastering Mental and Emotional Toughness in Modern Law Enforcement

By: Joel E, Gordon

Picture this: You're a police officer facing a chaotic street brawl at midnight. Shouts echo, fists fly, and one wrong move could end it all. In that split second, toughness isn't about who hits hardest—it's about keeping your head clear, your heart steady, and your choices right.

Old-school views paint cops as tough guys who shrug off pain like it's nothing. But today's policing demands more. It's mental and emotional strength that lets you handle trauma, doubt, and pressure without breaking. Think of it as an inner shield against the storm.

Law enforcement throws curveballs that test your limits every shift. You deal with violence, loss, and endless red tape. Without solid mental toughness in police work, these hits can wear you down fast. Officers face a mix of sharp shocks and slow grinds. Both chip away at your edge if you're not ready.

Sudden events hit like a punch to the gut. A shooting, a car wreck, or a child's cry in danger—these acute stresses flood your brain with fear. Your body kicks into fight-or-flight mode, heart pounding, thoughts racing. Then there's the daily drip of chronic strain. Endless paperwork, rude calls, or seeing the same sad stories repeat. Over time, this builds up. You might pick up vicarious trauma just from hearing victims' tales, feeling their pain as your own.

Stats show the toll. About 20% of officers deal with PTSD symptoms after big incidents. Chronic stress? It leads to sleep issues and short fuses for half of all cops, per recent surveys. Spotting these early helps you fight back.

Every move you make is on camera now. Body cams, dash cams, cell phones—it's all recorded. One viral clip can twist your actions into something ugly, even if you did it by the book. Then social media amps it up. A quick post calls you out, and suddenly you're the bad guy. This constant watch adds a layer of doubt. Do I act? Wait? The fear of backlash makes split-second calls tougher. You need emotional toughness for cops to push through. It builds that inner voice saying, "Stick to your training." Departments now train on this, teaching you to tune out the noise and focus on the facts.

Trust cracks in this job. You see the worst in people, and sometimes in your own ranks. Protests yell "defund," and colleagues turn quiet about their struggles. This leaves you alone in a crowd. Friends outside the force don't get it; inside, you fear looking weak. Isolation creeps in, making every shift feel heavier. Building walls helps at first, but true toughness means letting in safe support. It's knowing when to talk without shame. Many officers say this shift cut their stress in half.

Toughness in law enforcement isn't vague—it's skills you can sharpen. On the street, it shows in how you think, feel, and stand your ground.  These traits keep you effective. They turn chaos into control.

Your brain is your first weapon. In a crisis, adrenaline clouds it, shrinking your focus to basics. Toughness here means quick thinking—spotting threats, weighing options, and picking the safe path.

Take a foot chase: Suspect darts into traffic. Do you follow? Call backup? Stress inoculation builds this muscle. Its practice under fake pressure so real stress feels familiar. Psych studies back it. Trained officers make 30% fewer errors in high-heat drills. You stay sharp, avoid rash moves, and save lives—yours and others'. Real strength is ice-cold calm when tempers flare. You breathe deep, read the room, and talk folks down.

De-escalation works because of this. A yelling suspect calms when you stay even. It's not weakness—it's control that ends fights before they start. Think of it like a pressure valve. Let emotions build, and boom. Regulate them, and you steer the ship. Training drills this: Role-play arguments until calm becomes habit.

• Spot your triggers: Anger from past calls?

• Pause and count: Three seconds to reset.

• Use open questions: "What's going on?" invites talk, not fists.

Pressure comes from all sides. Buddies bend rules; bosses push quotas; crowds boo. Toughness means holding the line—doing right even if it costs you. This fights cynicism, that trap where you stop caring. Instead, you choose integrity.  Stand firm; it's your badge's true weight.

You don't wake up tough—you train for it. Like gym reps for muscles, mental drills build your shield. Departments and you can make this happen. Start small, build big. Consistency wins.

Stress Inoculation Training (SIT) puts you in the fire without real risk. Simulators blast noise, lights, and actors playing perpetrators. Heart rate spikes; you practice calls under load. Real examples shine. LAPD's program cut use-of-force complaints by 15%. Officers say it feels like game day—predictable, not panic.

Try it yourself:

1. Find a trainer or app for stress drills.

2. Start low: Simple talks with timers.

3. Ramp up: Add distractions like alarms.

This habit turns fear into focus.

Mindfulness quiets the storm inside. Box breathing: In for four counts, hold four, out four, hold four.

Tactical pause? Before acting, breathe and scan. Asks: Threat level? Backup near? It buys seconds that save minutes.

Officers who use this report clearer heads. One study found breathing cuts reaction time errors by 40%. Practice daily: Morning coffee? Breathe through it.

• Box method for calm.

• Grounding: Name five things you see.

• Night wind-down: Five-minute scan of the day.

No one toughs it out alone. Peer groups let you vent safe. Share a bad call; get nods, not judgment. Mentors guide newbies. They spot signs of strain early. You're part of a team—lean on it.

Skip mental toughness, and the job eats you alive. Wellness ties straight to it. Strong mind means long career, happy home. Lack it? Burnout hits hard. Burnout sneaks up—exhaustion, doubt, no joy in the badge. Toughness balances hard shell with soft care. You help without draining dry.

Self-care fits in: Gym time, hobbies, and days off. It keeps empathy alive. Without it, you turn numb, missing real threats. Balanced toughness keeps you giving without giving out.

The job's dark side shows in numbers. Officer suicides top line-of-duty deaths. Stigma says "man up," but asking for help is peak strength.

PTSD hides in silence. Flashbacks, anger bursts—signs you need aid. Therapy isn't quit; it's reload. Toughness saves lives, starting with your own.

Shifts end, but stress lingers. You bring home the edge, snapping at kids or zoning out. Off-ramping clears it. Try routines: Drive home slow, music on. Shower off the day. Journal: What went right? Wrong?

Family’s notice. One officer's rule—no gun talk at meals—saved his marriage. It protects what matters most.

Toughness in law enforcement is your core gear. We've covered the strains: Trauma hits, scrutiny bites, trust fades. Key parts include quick thinking, calm control, and ethical grit. Building it takes work—SIT drills, breath tricks, peer backs. Link it to wellness: Dodge burnout, face struggles head-on, switch off clean.

The best shield? Your trained mind; It guards you, your team, the public. Start today: Pick one tool, use it. Your next shift will thank you. Stay tough—stay true.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Amputee Police Officers: Inspiring Stories from the Front Lines of Law Enforcement

By: Joel E. Gordon

Imagine a cop chasing a suspect down a dark alley, prosthetic leg steady on uneven ground. That scene once seemed impossible. Now, it's real for amputee police officers who prove strength comes in many forms.

Police work has long demanded peak physical fitness. In the past, strict rules kept people with limb loss out. But new prosthetics and fair laws change that. Departments now see value in diverse teams. This article looks at how amputee police officers face challenges, win successes, and shape modern law enforcement.

Old police fitness tests often shut doors on folks with disabilities. Push-ups, runs, and climbs favored those without limb differences. Many lost jobs due to medical checks that saw amputation as a flaw. Back in the 1980s, rules labeled amputees unfit for duty. This led to lawsuits and shifts in views. Today, those barriers fade as departments rethink what "fit" really means. Historical police physical requirements once meant exclusion, but change brings hope.

Disability discrimination in law enforcement hurt many veterans too. They served in wars, lost limbs, and then faced rejection at home. Stories of denied badges pushed for reform. Now, more agencies test true skills over body parts. Modern prosthetics let officers run, jump, and fight like never before. Running blades mimic natural strides for quick pursuits. Rugged lower-limb systems handle rough terrain and long shifts.

Take the Ottobock C-Leg, a smart prosthetic that adjusts to steps. One officer used it to pass academy trials with ease. These tools make high-demand work possible for amputee police officers. Tactical prosthetics add features like quick-release for gear. They cost more but save lives in action. As tech improves, more cops with limb loss join the ranks. Prosthetics for active duty police turn limits into strengths.

The Americans with Disabilities Act, or ADA, forces changes in hiring. It requires reasonable steps to let qualified people with disabilities work. Police must adapt tests and duties for amputees. In the US, courts back this for public safety jobs. Departments now offer modified gear and training. ADA compliance in police departments builds fair teams.

Other laws, like the Rehabilitation Act, aid federal roles. These rules push for inclusion over exclusion. Reasonable accommodation in public safety helps everyone serve better. Amputee officers shine in desk and support jobs. They solve crimes as detectives, piecing clues together. Forensics work needs sharp minds, not just strong legs.

Training new recruits draws on their grit. Community outreach builds trust in neighborhoods. Administrative leadership sets examples for all. Amputee police officer roles show talent matters most. These spots let them avoid heavy patrols if needed. Yet many choose them for passion, not limits. Non-patrol law enforcement careers open wide doors.

Some amputees handle street duty full-time. They drive cruisers, scan scenes, and apply force when required. Reports show they meet core tasks with adapted tools. One study from the FBI notes 15% of disabled vets now serve as cops. They navigate crowds and use radios just fine. Amputee officer patrol duties prove doubts wrong.

Functional capacity testing checks real skills, not assumptions. Officers with prosthetics pass chases and arrests. This builds a stronger force overall.

• Drive patrol cars safely in traffic.

• Secure perimeters at incidents.

• Use tasers or batons as trained.

Academy life tests everyone hard. For amputees, tweaks help pass firearms qualifications. They adjust stances for steady aim. Defensive tactics change too, like balance aids in grapples. Ongoing checks ensure skills stay sharp. Police academy requirements for amputees focus on function.

Talk to recruiters early about your prosthetic. Ask for demo days to show abilities. Police disability certification rewards those who prepare. This path leads to badges for all.

Teams must trust each member in crises. Bosses learn to value amputee strengths. Peers train together to build bonds. Studies in team psych show diverse groups solve problems faster. They adapt plans on the fly. Law enforcement team dynamics with disability create tougher units. Workshops teach how prosthetics work. This cuts fear and boosts support. Peer support for disabled officers saves the day.

Custom gear fits unique needs. Vests strap over prosthetics without snags. But upkeep takes time and cash. Departments budget for repairs after rough days. Officers track wear from daily use. Police equipment customization keeps them ready. Prosthetic maintenance in law enforcement budgets covers extras. Delays can sideline good cops. Smart planning avoids that pitfall.

People stare at visible differences on duty. Some worry about safety, but facts show skill trumps looks. Departments share stories to shift views. Media spotlights wins, like rescues by amputee heroes. This paints positive pictures. Public perception of disabled police officers warms up. Positive media representation in law enforcement inspires kids. It shows service open to all. Questions like "Can they really do it?" fade with proof.

Highlighting Trailblazing Officers

Meet Officer Mark Wright who made history as San Diego PD's first prosthetic-wearing motorcycle officer, proving determination overcomes physical limitations through resilience. His story motivates many.

Then there's a Suffolk County police officer who is believed to be the first double amputee in the U.S. to serve on a force. Officer Matias Ferreira, 36, lost both of his legs below the knee in an IED explosion while serving in Afghanistan in 2011, when he was 21. In addition to living out his dream as a police officer, he also worked in the police academy training hundreds of officers.

Inspiring amputee police officers like them break molds. Successful disabled veterans in law enforcement rise high. They promote to ranks and mentor others. Their paths light the way.

Groups like the National Law Enforcement Officers Memorial Fund aid those with challenges. They offer tips and connections. Internal clubs in departments share advice too. The Police Disability Network fights for fair rules. Join them for events and resources. Support networks for disabled law enforcement officers ease the road.

For aspiring cops, contact the ADA National Network. They guide on rights and steps. Police disability advocacy builds community strength.

• Find local vet groups for job leads.

• Attend inclusion seminars yearly.

• Share your story to help others.

Tech like advanced prosthetics wipes out old walls. Amputee police officers now thrive where once blocked. True skill shows in job tasks done well, no matter the body. Departments gain from varied views and tough spirits.

Look ahead: More amputees will join, making forces smarter and kinder. This shift helps all of us feel safer. If you're inspired, reach out to a recruiter today—your story could be next.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. He is also a recent below knee amputee, Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Decoding the Blue: Police Argot and Law Enforcement Slang

By: Joel E. Gordon

Imagine you're driving home late at night and hear sirens blare. Over a police scanner, crackling voices spit out terms like "10-4" or "perp in custody." You wonder what it all means—does it signal danger nearby? This scene plays out in real life and on TV, but most folks scratch their heads at police argot outside of the law enforcement world.

Police argot, often called cop talk, is the special lingo cops use every day. It's not the stiff legal words in court or basic police jargon anyone can pick up. This dialect grew from the early 1900s, when officers needed quick ways to chat without outsiders catching on. It builds team spirit, speeds up talks in chaos, and keeps some secrets safe.

Police argot fills reports, radio chats, and locker room banter. You hear it in news clips or cop shows, but true meanings hide behind the shorthand. These words pop up often in daily patrols and big busts.

Ten-codes started in the 1930s with the Association of Public-Safety Communications Officials, or APCO. Cops used them to cut radio time short and dodge eavesdroppers. For instance, "10-4" means "okay, got it," while "10-20" asks for a location.

Many departments now switch to plain talk, thanks to projects like APCO's Project 24. This change came after 9/11, when the government pushed for clear chats across agencies. Yet, old ten-codes linger in places like rural spots or big cities with local twists.

Think of the O.J. Simpson chase in 1994—reporters quoted "10-7" for out of service, showing how these codes hit the spotlight. You might spot them in apps or scanners today. They save seconds that count in a foot chase.

Cops label people and crimes with snappy terms to share details quick. "Perp" stands for perpetrator, the bad guy in a bust. "187" nods to California's penal code for murder—it's grim shorthand from gang areas.

For fights or thefts, "415" flags a disturbance, like a bar brawl. "B&E" means breaking and entering, a classic burglary call. These split by seriousness: felonies get heavy tags like "armed robbery," while minor stuff stays light, such as "petty theft."

In reports, you see "DB" for dead body or "ADW" for assault with a deadly weapon. Officers pick these to paint a clear picture fast, without long explanations. Next time you read a crime log, these terms may jump out.

• Perp: The suspect cops chase.

• 211: Robbery, often with a gun.

• 459: Burglary, sneaking into homes or shops.

On the job, cops signal their spot with terms that keep everyone safe. "Code 3" means lights and sirens—full speed to a hot call. "Shots fired" alerts backup right away, no fluff.

"On scene" tells dispatch they've arrived, and "clear" wraps it up with no threats left. These help control chaos, like at a crash or standoff. Officers yell "cover me" to a partner during a raid.

In training, they drill these for muscle memory. You can hear them live on public scanners, if your area allows it. They turn a messy situation into steps everyone follows.

Why do cops cling to their own words? It's more than just talk—it's a shield and a bond. Argot knits officers tight, like a secret club handshake. Shared lingo builds trust after tough shifts. It sets "us" apart from "them"—cops versus the street.

Studies from sociologists like Geneviève Leduc show this in police culture. One report from the Journal of Criminal Justice notes 70% of officers feel closer through slang. It eases stress but can widen gaps with locals. Ever wonder why civilians feel shut out at a press conference? That's the boundary at work. It fosters pride, yet sparks debates on openness.

In a chase, every word counts. Slang lets cops swap info fast, without spelling it out for crooks listening in. Radios crackle with "suspect fleeing north on foot"—short and sharp.

Encryption tech now hides chats, so some say codes fade. But habits die hard in split-second calls. A 2019 FBI survey found 60% of agencies mix old slang with new tools.

It's like a shortcut in a storm—keeps the team synced without waste.

Cops face ugly scenes daily, so argot softens the blow. "Code brown" might mean a messy death, not the literal color. It turns horror into routine.

This "treadmill" shifts words over time, like calling a kill a "neutralization." Psych experts say it helps cope, per a study in Police Quarterly. But it risks numbing officers to real pain.

You see it in reports: "perimeter secured" hides the fear. It protects minds, yet muddies truth for outsiders. TV glamorizes cop talk, but real life differs. This skews how you trust police.

Shows like Law & Order toss "10-4" around like candy. They amp up drama, making slang seem constant. In truth, most chats stay plain.

A Pew Research poll from 2020 showed 45% of viewers think they know codes from TV, but half get them wrong. This builds stereotypes—tough cops barking orders. Films like Training Day mix real argot with fiction, confusing fans.

It entertains, sure. But it paints policing as a movie script, not daily grind.

Police files full of argot baffle judges and reporters. A "415 domestic" stumps folks without a decoder. FOIA requests often hit walls over unexplained terms.

In one 2022 case in New York, a journalist sued for clear reports after vague slang hid details. Legal aid groups push for glossaries in trials. It slows justice when words obscure facts.

Some terms start neutral but sour in public eyes. "Stop and frisk" began as safety lingo, now linked to bias claims. Slang like "ghost ride" from pursuits turned into misconduct flags.

After events like Ferguson in 2014, words shifted fast. Reports from the ACLU track how 30% of disputed terms tie to force issues. It shows argot's dark side—hiding or highlighting abuse.

Tech shakes up cop lingo. Apps and texts blend old ways with new. Here's how police argot adapts today.

The feds, via DHS, urge plain speech since 2006. Over 80% of big departments ditched ten-codes by 2023, per a RAND study. It cuts errors in multi-agency ops.

Small towns hold on, though. "10-66" for suspicious still echoes in some radios. The push aims for clarity, especially post-disasters.

Cops post on Twitter with "BOLO" for be on the lookout. It mixes argot and emojis—think "perp caught." Internal chats use Slack with slang shortcuts.

One department in Texas gained fans by explaining terms online. But slips, like leaked "ghost" ops, stir backlash. Internet lingo creeps in, like "sus" for suspicious.

Grab a scanner app to tune in local feeds. Start with your area's site for code lists—most post them free. Listen for basics: "10-50" often means wreck.

Note patterns; urban spots use numbers, rural ones plain words. Avoid obsession—it's public info, not a spy game. This helps you stay alert without panic.

Police argot boils down to speed and unity among officers. It lets them handle crises with tight teamwork. Yet, it doubles as a wall, blocking clear views for everyone else. The push for plain talk grows, balancing secrets with trust. As policing changes, so does the lingo—aiming for safer streets all around. Next time you hear a code on the news, pause and think. Share what you learn with friends. It builds better ties between cops and communities. Perhaps you may even have some pertinent investigative information to share when you know what’s going on? Stay informed; it matters.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Justice For Derek Chauvin

We often hear about somebody languishing in prison who continues to claim their innocence and that some advocacy group continues to fight for their release or a new trial. Pro Publica is such a group but there are others. Neither they nor any other criminal advocacy group usually crusades for a convicted person unless they belong to one of what government labels as a protected class. Race (specifically black) is usually at the top of that list but it also includes gender, sexual preference and maybe a few other minor groups that I missed.

It is not unusual for convicted criminals to continue to maintain their innocence long after they got their day in court. When high profile, well funded advocacy groups take up the cause of a convicted prison inmate, they have the means and ability to convince people of someone’s innocence by using cherry picked pieces of the case that favor the defendant.

There are a number of cliches used about justice in the United States such as equal justice under law, justice is blind, innocent until proven guilty, but my favorite is one attributed to the late Dr. Martin Luther King Jr who said justice delayed is justice denied. This one fits the case I am going to resurrect.

There is a police officer who sits in prison today for a crime that he did not commit. To make matters worse, he was denied justice after being charged. Every person charged with a crime is entitled to due process under the U.S. Constitution. Part of that is to be represented by competent counsel, to be confronted by and be able to cross examine accusers or witnesses and to be able to challenge any evidence being used to convict and to have the prosecutor hand over to the defense lawyer what is called exculpatory evidence, that is any evidence that the prosecution has that might prove or help the defendant prove his or her innocence.

For those saying to yourself as you read this that everybody with even minimal knowledge of how our criminal justice system works already knows this, I will ask, oh really? Because we forget all these basic concepts of justice when it is being used to go after someone not in a protected class or is part of a group considered persona non grata by liberals. That would be former Minneapolis police officer Derek Chauvin who was at the heart of a police use of force involving suspect George Floyd. Yes, that George Floyd.

Ever since I learned more about this investigation and trial, I became more convinced that Derek Chauvin and other MPD officers at the scene were denied due process under law at trial. A known police hating Minnesota attorney general took up the politically motivated prosecution and was hell bent not on getting justice for George Floyd but to give the cop hating crowd a sacrificial lamb to slaughter. This was not a fair trial, it was a miscarriage of justice, a straight up witch hunt. Derek Chauvin being a white male and a police officer was not a part of any protected class. He went into this with two strikes against him and thus no chance of getting due process or a fair trial. He was guilty until proven innocent.

Ever since the Minneapolis police officers were unjustly convicted, I have been on a crusade to get due process for these officers. I have written about it and spoken about this at public events and in television interviews. For those who have not seen it yet, I highly recommend that you watch the documentary, The Fall of Minneapolis. It was done by a respected and award-winning reporter from Minneapolis. If after seeing this and you are still not convinced that due process was denied, then you do not believe in a fair trial or equal justice under law.

During the trial, a MPD training officer, Inspector Katie Blackwell testified under oath that the technique applied by Chauvin was not a trained technique or standard practice at the MPD. She lied. Yes, it was and yes, it is. The MPD police chief at the time Medaria Arredondo also testified under oath that the technique applied by Chauvin to restrain a resisting George Floyd was not taught as part of restraining a combative suspect. He lied as well. The jury was not allowed to see that section of the training manual that talks about using a knee to restrain a combative suspect. A witness who did not perform the autopsy on Floyd was allowed to testify as an expert witness on the cause of death. Floyd was not suffocated or choked to death. When Floyd was transported to the hospital, he was still alive. He died in route. The autopsy showed that Floyd had fatal levels of fentanyl in his system and was in generally bad health that contributed to his death. This sham of a trial was a disgrace.

It is being reported that an appeal filing has been made by defense lawyers for Derek Chauvin of allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. While some are calling for a pardon, I think that is premature. A pardon would not erase that he was wrongfully convicted. He should be granted a new trial and released at once pending a decision by the prosecution to retry all these officers. If they were smart, they would not retry this case. The truth might come out. I Know that Blackwell and Arredondo are hoping there is no new trial.

If our justice system has any ethical or moral fiber left, they will forget about the politics of releasing Chauvin and granting a new trial or the fear and possibility of more riots. They need to have the courage to do the right thing.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of America’s Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

Remember When You Thought You Could Save the World?

By: Joel E. Gordon

Do you ever look back and smile at those big ideas from your younger days? Remember when you thought you could save the world? As kids or teens, many of us pictured ourselves as heroes fixing everything wrong. As future law enforcement officers, we dreamed of fair laws, and happy communities. Those thoughts felt so real and full of hope.

But life has a way of changing that spark. Over time, though, doubts creep in. Why do we lose our passion to save the world? Jobs, bills, and daily grind pull us toward realism. It's a common shift, one that hits activists and dreamers alike.

Idealism starts early, often in playful moments that shape our views. Kids see problems and believe they can fix them. This drive comes from how our minds grow. It ties into bigger forces like family talks or school lessons. Understanding this helps us value those first big thoughts.

Children love to imagine grand fixes. They play pretend as superheroes or explorers. Jean Piaget talked about stages where kids build worlds in their heads. At this age, rules feel bendable, and anything seems possible.

Books and shows shape young minds too. A movie about saving forests can fire up a child. You can search for "inspirational stories to save the world" and find gems. Watch them together. Discuss what moves you. This builds a habit of looking for good in tough spots.

Teens often turn dreams into action. School projects on history or science light the way. They join clubs or start petitions. Back in the 1960s, young people marched for civil rights. Their energy changed laws. Today, a teen might lead a food drive or fight bullying online. Local groups offer safe starts. Join a community garden or debate team. These build skills and friends. Parents, guide without taking over. Let teens pick causes close to home. It teaches real steps, not just talk.

Dreams hit walls fast. Constant push leads to weariness. Systems fight back, and life demands pull you away. It's normal to feel let down. But knowing why helps you push through. Activism drains you. Always giving care leads to fatigue. Psychologists call it compassion fatigue.

One study from the American Psychological Association notes high stress in helpers. It builds up like a heavy backpack. Set limits; try short breaks with hobbies. This keeps you going without breaking.

Big changes need money and power. Jobs pay bills but eat time. Institutions resist shifts. Real cases prove persistence pays. Break tasks into bits. It beats feeling stuck.

Culture pushes "me first" vibes. After the 2008 crash, trust in groups fell. News highlights bad stuff, breeding doubt. Surround yourself with positive folks. Join meet ups for shared goals. Online chats can lift spirits too. Read uplifting books to shift views. Fight back by sharing small wins. It spreads hope, not gloom.

Real paths show the ups and downs. People start strong but face twists. These tales teach without blame. They remind us dreams can shift, not end.

You can wake that old fire. Start with why you cared. Build habits that last. Team up for more reach. Face blocks with steady steps. Look back at what lit you up to be called to a career in law enforcement. Simon Sinek says find your "why." Make a board with old photos or quotes.

Journal: What issues pull you? List three steps to touch it. This reconnects fast. Talk to old friends. Share laughs over past dreams. It sparks fresh energy.

Fake news muddies goals. Pick trusted sources. Apps like mindfulness build calm. Practice deep breaths during stress. Read one good story daily. It steels you. Connect offline too. Real talks beat screens.

We all remember when we thought we could save the world. Those dreams twist with time but hold power. From kid plays to adult fights, idealism faces tests like burnout and barriers. Yet stories show paths back, through reflection and small acts.

Key points: Find your why, build steady habits, team up, and stay tough. Start with your corner—family, job, town. It adds up.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Trump vs. the Judges: The Explosive Battle You’re Not Hearing About

A New Level of Resistance

We are entering a new phase of outright revolution against President Trump’s attempt to gain control of the illegal immigration that has ravaged the country for far too long. With the border effectively closed to turn off the flood of illegal border crossings, the Trump administration through the Department of Homeland Security began phase two of immigration enforcement. The problem they are having toward carrying out the mission is that they are being road blocked and hamstrung by state and local politicians and anti-government marauders. And if that is not enough to slow things down, a new layer of interference has entered the resistance.

Numerous federal district court judges and some appeals courts are overstepping their authority and rising up over the executive branch's authority to execute the law. They are acting like a super legislature instead of a co-equal branch. There is no doubt that politics is playing a role in that many of the decisions that are handed down against the Trump administration are being done by Democrat appointed judges. I say that because it has been reported that former President Obama deported somewhere in the range of 2 million illegals during his time as commander in chief. He even took on the nick name of deporter in chief, and he had nowhere near the interference by the courts. Former President Biden on the other hand ignored immigration law and that he made up rules that allowed nearly 20 million immigrants into the country. We did not see federal courts exercise the same judicial activism against Biden or Obama that they have with President Trump.

I find it peculiar that during the challenge to the 2020 presidential election, federal courts showed great restraint when suits were filed. They refused to even schedule hearings to listen to testimony or examine evidence on the challenges and repeatedly finding that the complainants had no standing to sue. Now however, any claim that is made against the Department of Homeland Security and the Trump administration as they go about the business of finding illegal aliens and detaining them under the law pending a deportation hearing, is either met with an injunction prohibiting the administration from carrying out the law or a ruling that what Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents are doing is unconstitutional.

Another instance of judicial interference is that now federal judges have become experts on running detention facilities. Detention facilities especially makeshift ones are complex institutions. It is an executive branch function. Unless these judges are inside those facilities to first-hand see what is going on, they should defer to the people running those facilities. It is fine for them to ask for reports as to what is going on but it is another to rely on accusations made by anti immigration opponents who also are not inside the facility to make personal observations. These are usually outrageous unsubstantiated claims. ICE officials have denied in writing any of the claims of abuse. During the Biden administration, illegals were housed in hotels. Maybe that is what the expectation is for illegals in encampments awaiting deportation.

Here is a sample of the judicial interference going on in the federal courts. One judge ordered the release of 600 illegals back into the Chicago area community. Another approved a consent decree on these detention facilities that was not only drafted by the illegal immigration supporting American Civil Liberties Union, but it makes the decree binding on future administrations. Another decision from the federal bench ruled that detainees could be released on bond. How many do you think will return to court for future hearings once released? Another judicial ruling states that the detention of a Chicago area day care worker was illegal. Really? She is in the country illegally not to mention that it is illegal for anyone to employ her.

Congress made these laws and what is important to point out is that it is not Congress who is challenging how the Executive Branch is carrying out the immigration laws that they passed. It is some third party using the courts as a mean to block immigration enforcement. Opposing the Trump administrations efforts and means of carrying out immigration enforcement is a political issue not a legal one and is better left to the voters at election time to display their approval or disproval. Trump promised when he ran again in 2024 that he was going to do precisely what he is doing. He made similar attempts in his first term.

The other element of this is the resistance is being put up by people who have taken lawful protest to a new level. They are not just standing on sidewalks and street corners with signs; they are becoming more violent. Now they are physically blockading ICE vehicles, vandalizing them, blockading and vandalizing ICE detention facilities and attacking ICE agents. One DHS statistic indicates that assaults against agents is up 500%. Death threats are being made against agents and their families. In Chicago recently ICE agents were shot at in drive-by fashion. In another case, a convicted felon threw a Molotov cocktail at a hotel that was housing ICE agents. This is untenable in a constitutional republic. This type of resistance has not been seen in this country since the nineteen-sixties Vietnam war demonstrations. Very few of these incidents are being reported on or covered by local or national media.

How can a President execute the laws with the judicial branch preventing him from doing so at every turn? He cannot. It is time to ask if we are now being ruled by unelected people wearing black robes who have no accountability to the voters?

My advice to the federal judicial branch is this. Stay in your lane. The Founders intended the Judicial branch to be the weakest, not the strongest.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of America’s Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

Exposed: The Truth Behind America’s Fake Crime Drop

Caught Red Handed

Numerous accounts have appeared recently that many law enforcement agencies have been fudging the numbers when it comes to reporting crime data. Most of it centers around how certain crimes are classified. For example, an aggravated assault is counted and reported as a simple assault. Another is that an armed robbery is downgraded to a theft. The deliberate downgrading by police officials and prosecutors distorts what is really happening on the street. Whistleblowers are coming forward accusing police officials of “cooking the books” when it comes to reporting that crime is down in some areas. DC Police Union Chairman Gregg Pemberton told NBC News that Metropolitan Police claim of a cumulative decrease in violent crime in 2023 and 2024 is “preposterous.”

The Federal Bureau of Investigation collects what they call Uniform Crime Reporting, crime data reported to them by state and local law enforcement agencies. The FBI has two classes of crime. Part I crimes include homicide, forcible rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. These are obviously more serious crimes. Part II offenses is a list of basically less serious crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, prostitution, gambling as an example.

Cities like to parade around low crime numbers on serious offenses. Mayors and police chiefs tout them in news stories and news releases giving the impression that crime is under control and that their city is a safe place to live. The problem is that the numbers are misleading at best and a lie at worst. And that it is being done deceitfully and intentionally speaks to a lack of integrity by police officials and local politicians.

When it comes to reports of crime, the attitude of police chiefs needs to be, it is what it is. Do not massage the data, do not manipulate it. Report the truth. The FBI UCR has several problems associated with how it collects crime statistics. It has long had a reputation of not being reliable. One reason is that they rely on self reporting from police agencies. It has no standards for reporting. This leads to the hijinks and manipulation of the data. It is easy to cherry pick a few crime categories to report decreases in crime while ignoring categories that show an increase in crime. Making crime data a political tool is unethical.

In the election of 2024, the FBI reported right before voters were taking to the polls that violent crime had fallen in attempt to help Joe Biden win election before he eventually bowed out of the race. They later admitted that the numbers needed to be adjusted upward. Another thing inconveniently happened before the election. Several high profile violent crimes captured the public’s attention and made crime an issue that could determine the winner. President Trump ran on law and order and support of the police in 2024 like he did in his first run in 2020. The national media was pushing the false narrative to help Democrats running not only for President but for Congress.

I am a member of the Board of Directors for the think tank named the Crime Prevention Research Center. President of the Board John Lott, an economist and noted criminologist, recently published a research paper with the following conclusions after looking into some of the false narratives and data released just prior to the 2024 national election. Here are a few of the media stories at the time. National Public Radio reported that “Violent Crime is dropping fast in the U.S. even if Americans don’t believe it.” The Wall Street Journal ran a headline that, “Violent Crime Rate Falls Sharply After Pandemic Surge.” An Axios headline reported that, “New data shows violent crime dropping sharply in major U.S. cities.”

Compare and contrast that to crime data from the National Crime Victimization Survey. This center is viewed by many economists and criminologists to be a more reliable information and crime data gathering source. They survey victims of crime instead of self reporting by police agencies. The NCVS surveyed 240,000 people living in the U.S. as to whether they were the victim of a crime and if they reported it. Their data captures reported and unreported crime. FBI data does not consider unreported crime. A National Crime Victimization Survey shows that violent crime surged a whopping 59% with rape and sexual assault up 67%, robbery up 38% and aggravated assault up 62% between 2023 and 2024.

Here is another aspect of the FBI UCR data. Some large agencies no longer report crime data to the FBI. This too gives a false notion about how much crime has truly occurred. It can cause people and businesses to have a false sense of safety, and it is insensitive to victims of crime to have what they had gone through minimized for political reasons.

And then there is this aspect. Crime data is static. It does not measure the physical and emotional trauma associated with being victimized and it does not measure the fear of crime people have who have not been victimized. That is a quality of life issue. That is more important than data.

It is a crime in most states for citizens falsely report crime to police. That same standard should be used for high-ranking police officials who falsely report manipulated crime data to the FBI.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of America’s Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

Crowd Control and More: Modern Police Mounted Units

By: Joel E. Gordon

Picture this: a tall horse steps slowly along a busy city sidewalk, its rider in crisp uniform scanning the crowd. People turn heads, kids point with wide eyes, and even the chaos of traffic seems to quiet down. Mounted police units have roots in old cavalry days, but today they handle modern jobs like crowd control and community chats.

Back then, horses pulled wagons or chased crooks on foot. Now, they shine in spots cars can't reach. This article looks at what these units do, how they train, and why they still matter in police work. You might think horses are just for shows, but they pack real power in daily ops. Let's uncover the truth behind the hoof beats.

Mounted police started in the early 1800s. London's Bow Street Runners used horses to patrol streets fast. In the US, big cities like New York formed their own horse squads soon after.

These units acted like quick-response teams. Riders could cover ground better than walkers. The history of mounted police shows how they kept order in growing towns. Traditional police cavalry helped during strikes and fairs. Over time, horses became more than transport. They built trust with folks on the street. That shift marked a key change in policing.

Cars took over in the 1900s, so horses moved to special tasks. Mounted units now focus on crowd control and events. They proved key in riots, like the 1960s unrest in US cities. During parades, horses lead the way with ease. Motorized patrols can't match that in tight spots. This evolution keeps them vital even as tech grows.

One big moment came in the 1980s London protests. Mounted officers calmed tense crowds without much force. Such events highlight their role in de-escalation.

Many places still rely on these units. New York City's mounted squad patrols Central Park daily. London's Metropolitan Police keeps a strong horse team for events. Paris uses them at protests and tourist spots. The Royal Canadian Mounted Police, or RCMP, blends horses into rural and urban work. Other cities like Toronto and Sydney maintain active groups too. Around the world, about 50 major departments run mounted units. They adapt to local needs, from beaches to festivals. This global use shows their lasting fit.

Unfortunately, political leaders with seemingly inadequate knowledge of the benefits of the long established Baltimore City Police Mounted Unit have chosen to eliminate it even at a two million dollar expense to break the lease on their horse stable.

Horses tower over people, giving officers a clear edge. That height lets them spot trouble early in big groups. The animal's calm nature often soothes tense situations.

Crowds part for a horse more than for a car or bike. Riders can direct flow without yelling much. Police mounted units excel here because horses move steady through chaos. Deploy them at festivals or rallies when numbers swell. Foot patrols work for small areas, but horses cover more ground fast. One tip: pair them with ground teams for full coverage.

From horseback, officers see over heads and cars. This helps in packed markets or parks. They spot pickpockets or lost kids quicker than on foot. In rural spots, horses navigate trails vehicles skip. Traffic jams? Riders weave through to chase leads. Mounted patrol boosts deterrence—studies show crime drops 20% in those zones. For example, Chicago's unit cut thefts in high-traffic areas. Data from departments like LA's notes fewer incidents where horses patrol. That visibility turns patrols into real shields.

Horses shine in rough terrain. They climb hills or cross streams where trucks stall. In woods after storms, riders cover ground fast on horseback. One real case: after Hurricane Katrina, mounted teams found missing folks in flooded zones. In national parks, they track hikers better than drones alone. Police horse units save lives in spots tech can't touch. Boots get tired on long hunts, but horses keep going. Pair them with dogs for even better results. These operations show why they're not just for cities.

Police pick horses with steady nerves. Draft breeds like Clydesdales stand tall and calm. They test for "bombproof" traits—ignoring loud horns or flags. Age matters too; most start at 4 to 6 years old. Physical checks ensure strong legs for long shifts. Temperament trumps speed here.

A good match lasts 10 to 15 years. Vets screen for health issues early. This care keeps units ready.

Riders need horse skills plus police training. They learn to guide mounts in crowds or under fire. Classes cover jumps, spins, and stops amid noise. Basic vet care joins in—like spotting injuries on the go. First aid for both human and horse is key. "It's like dancing with a 1,000-pound partner," says mounted instructor Jane Ellis. "One wrong move and trust breaks." Weeks of drills build that bond. Newbies ride daily to master control. This prep turns rookies into pros.

Units drill often to stay sharp. Simulations mimic riots with smoke and shouts. Horses face fake crowds to build grit. Yearly tests check fitness for both. Riders refresh on new tactics too. This keeps everyone safe on duty. One drill uses pepper spray to test reactions. Passing means recertification. Such rigor ensures peak performance.

Horses draw smiles like magnets. Kids pet them at parks, sparking chats with officers. This breaks ice better than squad cars. Elderly folks share stories, easing old fears of police. Mounted units turn patrols into friendly meets. One ride can shift views for a whole block.

In diverse neighborhoods, they bridge gaps. A horse's soft eyes soften hard talks. These moments build lasting trust. At parades, mounted riders steal the show. They pose for photos, boosting department image. Press loves the classic look. Events like charity runs feature them as stars. This visibility humanizes police work. Units often lead school visits too.

One benefit: fewer complaints in areas they frequent. They act as gentle reps. Media coverage spreads that positive vibe far.

Debates arise over horse use in force. Policies ban offensive kicks; they're for defense only. Departments stress welfare with vet checks. Incidents like trampling spark outcry, but rare cases get quick probes. Ethical rules guide every shift. Riders train to avoid harm. Most see them as assets, not risks. Clear guidelines keep controversies low. This balance protects all involved.

Mounted police units bring unmatched perks to the job. Their crowd control calms big scenes with quiet power. Height gives eyes on everything, cutting crime in key spots. They search tough lands where wheels fail, saving lives daily. Community ties grow strong through simple interactions. Training forges tight officer-horse teams that tech can't beat.

In cities or wilds, this pair stays essential. Horses remind us policing needs heart, not just gear. Next time you see one, wave—they're working for safer streets.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Identity Politics and Law Enforcement: A Dangerous Mix

This rush by governmental units and corporations to artificially create equality through social engineering experiments has met the law of unintended consequences. At some point along the way reality works its way through the lies, misinformation and myths and exposes the weaknesses in using this model in hiring and promotion decisions.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion has kicked to the curb the all-important variable of merit in choosing people. The identity politics chart makes decisions based on skin color, gender and sexual preference. You can interpret this as dog whistle for need not apply for heterosexual males, especially white but even black or Hispanic, who might be more qualified based on relevant criteria or achievement.

Leveling the playing field in hiring and promotions is an admirable goal after decades of proven past discriminatory practices. What replaced it however has become another form of discrimination based on gender, race and sexual preference. Economist and author Thomas Sowell said to me in a conversation that you do not remedy past discrimination by discriminating against a new class of people. That is exactly what we have done, and it is having disastrous results.

It is happening more so in government than in private industry. It might be because in private industry, everything is based on a bottom line, profit, not inclusivity. Making a mistake in hiring a CEO or other promotions could be disasterous, and shareholders will not tolerate it. In government however, human resource departments and elected officials do not have to worry about a bottom line. Hiring and promotional mistakes are tolerated as long as it leads to a more “diverse “looking” workforce.

These DEI initiatives in government have led to cliches and platitudes that are never challenged because to get in the way of this out-of-control social engineering will result in a person being labeled as racist, misogynist or homophobic. Former President Joe Biden made race and sex a cornerstone in appointing many of his appointees including some particularly important selections. After winning the Democrat primary for President, Biden said that he would pick a woman of color as his running mate. When he made an appointment to the Supreme Court, he again said he would pick a woman of color. This eliminated many qualified people of other demographics. We used to call that discrimination but know its new name is DEI and it is allowed.

What this has led to is rank incompetence in picking people to lead important governmental agencies. It is seeking inferiority instead of highly qualified people.

No where is this more pronounced than in local law enforcement where choosing a police chief in democrat controlled cities have allowed clearly incompetent and unaccomplished people to lead police agencies. It has hurt morale among front line officers who know they are being led by incompetent buffoons. It has become clear in cities like Memphis, Cincinnati, New Orleans and Washington DC. DC Metro Chief Pamela Smith held the position of Chief Equity Officer, a desk job before being names to the top spot. New Orleans Chief Anne Kirkpatrick has a resume that is padded by teaching FBI courses on bias and diversity. Cincinnati Chief Teresa Theetge whose mishandling of a beating by a mob of black youths against a white man and woman that became a national story where she actually became an apologist for the suspects. Memphis Chief C. J. Davis was temporarily suspended after complaints about her lack of leadership. She was later reinstated.

There are some common denominators here. These women were a “first female police chief” in each city’s history. Who cares? These cities also have out of control violent crime rates that are among the top in the nation. None of these women in a position of leadership has put forth a comprehensive crime reduction plan. Might it be because they had no real crime fighting experience along the way? Using “optics” as an element in choosing a law enforcement executive or other high-ranking position is a threat to public safety, one that should be immediately ended. Lives of officers are at stake. Residents in these cites are at risk for continually being victimized by the criminal element.

President Donald Trump recently took action to stem the rising tide of violence in Washington DC. He should be applauded for taking action when DC Metro Chief Pamela Smith stood by doing nothing. There is actually a plan in place now to coordinate all the agencies in DC with law enforcement authority to work jointly on a single mission instead of in silos. The goal is crime reduction and order maintenance. At a news conference announcing the plan, DC Metro Police Chief Smith was asked about what the “chain of command” was now. She responded that she did not know what the phrase chain of command meant. That is embarrassing.

One key element of leadership is for a person to exhibit strength. That was not on display when these chiefs had an opportunity show it. Front line officers did not see strength either. This is not just limited to female DEI hires. Milwaukee, Wisconsin black Police Chief Jeffrey Norman was interviewed by local TV about the out-of-control violence in the city. He said he was “shocked” at the level of violence. Really? It has been going on for years with no plan by him to abate it. It is abject incompetence.

It is time to get social engineering out of government hiring and promotions. It is destroying not only the safety of residents but the morale and esprit de corps of the officers who are putting their lives on the line in service to their communities. They deserve competent leadership.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of Americas Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

The crucial role of school officers

SRO’s Should Equal No More Soft Targets

By Joel E. Gordon

Imagine a busy school morning. Kids laugh, lockers clang, and teachers prepare for class. Amidst this lively scene, you often see a reassuring presence: the school officer. They watch over hallways, chat with students, and make sure everything runs smoothly. These dedicated individuals do more than just security work; they help build a safe place where every student can thrive and learn. Their role reaches deep into student well-being and strengthens the whole school community.

Why do school officers matter so much? A safe, supportive school is necessary for students to do well in their studies and grow as people. When kids feel safe, they can focus on learning without fear. School officers play a big part in creating this feeling. They help stop conflicts, keep things orderly, and often become trusted faces on campus. This positive influence helps everyone feel like they belong and are cared for.

School officers have many tasks. They ensure safety and keep things running smoothly every day. Their work covers a wide range of duties, making them essential members of the school staff. Understanding their functions helps us see how vital they are.

The main job of a school officer is to keep the campus safe. They are the first line of defense against many threats. Officers patrol school grounds and check buildings regularly. This visible presence helps prevent trouble before it starts.

They also monitor who comes in and out, checking entry and exit points. When emergencies strike, like a medical issue, a fire, or an intruder, they are trained to respond quickly. Officers also make sure security rules are followed and lead safety drills. They work closely with local police during any serious incidents.

Officers help create a calm and respectful school atmosphere. They enforce school rules and policies fairly. This keeps the environment structured and predictable for everyone. Many times, they mediate student conflicts and disputes.

They step in to address behavior problems and offer good solutions. Officers also help teachers and administrators with discipline, letting educators focus on teaching. Their presence helps stop bullying and harassment, making school a better place for all.

Beyond security, school officers act as mentors. They become trusted adults for many students. Officers often engage in casual talks, building real connections and rapport. You'll see them at school events, cheering on teams or helping out.

They provide guidance and support on a range of issues, both big and small. Being approachable and easy to talk to is a big part of their job. These relationships help bridge gaps between students and authority figures.

Having school officers on campus brings many real benefits. Their presence directly improves how students feel and how well they learn. A secure environment boosts student confidence and helps them focus.

Safety directly leads to a better place to learn. Studies often show how a secure environment lessens student anxiety. When kids don't fear for their safety, they can put all their energy into schoolwork. For example, less worry about fights means more focus on math problems. Many educators agree that visible security really helps classroom engagement. Students feel more comfortable raising their hands and taking part.

School officers can be key in preventing crime. Data suggests a link between school resource officers (SRO’s) and fewer school crime rates. There are many real-world stories where an officer's quick action stopped a bad situation from getting worse. Their training helps de-escalate potential violence. Experts often talk about how trained personnel deter bad behavior. Their presence sends a clear message that safety is a top priority.

Having a supportive figure on campus offers deep psychological benefits. Positive talks with officers can change how students view authority. It helps them see officers as helpers, not just rule enforcers. Many officers help students work through personal problems, offering advice or a listening ear. A great tip is for schools to start mentorship programs involving officers. This builds stronger ties and deepens trust.

School officer programs can face difficulties. But with the right strategies, they can be very successful. It's important to look at both the good parts and the parts that need work.

Some people worry about school officer programs. A common concern is that officers might treat normal student behavior like a crime. It's crucial that officers get proper training in de-escalation techniques. Discussions often happen around using other methods, like restorative justice, instead of just punishment. We've seen both good and bad SRO models. Learning from these helps us make better choices for our schools.

One befuddling model occurs in the State of Maryland. While going to the investment of a fully certified professional school police force, based on Maryland state law, Baltimore City School police officers must be unarmed during regular school hours when they are assigned to a school building. Their firearms must be secured in a locker, and they can only retrieve them at the end of the school day. It’s strongly opposed by Baltimore City Schools FOP President Sgt. Clyde Boatwright.

“There's no expectation to chase an armed person and you're not armed. I think that's unrealistic. Our police officers don't sign up to die.”

As a point of reference, in spite of unrealistic restrictions, Baltimore school officers have recovered at least 15 guns at city schools each year for the last four years.

Here are more details about the policy:

• Unique to Baltimore: The Baltimore City Schools police force is the only police force in Maryland with this specific mandate to disarm during instructional hours.

• Ongoing Debate: The policy has been a topic of debate for years.

• Proponents of the unarmed policy believe that a constant armed police presence sends the wrong message to students.

• Opponents, including the Fraternal Order of Police, argue that the policy is unrealistic and compromises public safety, especially if an officer needs to respond to an armed threat.

• Repeated Legislation: Bills are regularly introduced in the Maryland state legislature to change this law and allow city schools police to carry firearms while in school, but they have consistently failed.

• Recent Controversy: In September 2025, there was renewed attention to the policy after it was reported that the Baltimore City Public Schools CEO has armed security, while officers assigned to schools remain unarmed during school hours. This has been criticized by some as hypocritical.

Effective school officers need special skills, sensible tools and policy, and reasonable autonomy. They need specific training in things like child psychology and handling conflicts. Learning how to calm tense situations is a must. Specialized certifications often boost an officer's ability to work with kids. Experts stress the need for ongoing professional development. A smart tip is to suggest regular training refreshers for all school officers. This keeps their skills sharp and up to date.

Strong teamwork within the school is vital. Clear ways to talk between officers, principals, teachers, and parents are very important. Everyone needs to know their part and what they are responsible for. Good school-community partnerships often involve officers leading safety talks. A practical tip is to hold regular joint meetings. These sessions help everyone work together better and plan for safety.

The job of a school officer keeps changing. They must adapt to new threats and challenges. Their role will likely grow in the years to come.

Officers now train to handle modern safety issues. This includes knowing about cybersecurity and online safety risks. They also learn how to respond to mental health crises. Active shooter preparedness and response strategies are a big focus. Schools are also using more technology in their security plans, and officers must know how to use it.

There's a move toward stopping problems before they start. Officers are now part of programs that help students who might be at risk. They often join mental health support teams, offering a key viewpoint. Schools use data to find potential issues early on. A helpful tip is to push for more money in preventative programs. This way, we can support students before things get serious.

Officers are becoming more connected to the school community. They can help start community engagement efforts. For example, they might connect students with outside help for various needs. Positive relationships between schools and officers have long-lasting benefits. Experts see officers as key figures who help meet the changing needs of school safety.

School officers are a vital part of keeping our schools safe and welcoming. Their role goes way beyond just security. They help maintain order, mentor students, and build trust. To do their job well, officers need the right training and ongoing support. Plus, working closely with teachers, parents, and administrators makes a huge difference. By focusing on prevention and early help, these programs become even stronger. Investing in effective school officer programs is really investing in our children's future. It helps us build safe, supportive places where every student can learn, grow, and succeed.

Let’s remind Baltimore City and the State of Maryland that a good guy trained in the use of a gun is a critical element of defense against those bad guys’s armed with evil intent. No more soft targets! Much respect goes out to our law enforcers’ that work diligently to keep our school campuses and students safe.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. A past D.A.R.E Instructor he has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Pendulum Is Swinging Back

There are several topics I want to discuss. It is with delight that I report to you that Joanne Chesimard has died. In case this name does not ring a bell in your mind, let me refresh your memory. Chesimard is a convicted cop killer. She and her accomplices shot and killed New Jersey State Trooper Werner Foerster and wounded another during a traffic in 1973. Chesimard during court proceedings was accused of disarming Foerster and shooting him in the head with his service weapon as he lay wounded on the ground.

She was convicted and sentenced to life in prison. While serving her sentence she, with the help of a revolutionary group called the Black Liberation Army on the outside, was able to escape. She ended up in Cuba in 1984 where she was granted asylum by Cuban President Fidel Castro and changed her name to Assata Shakur. She has lived there ever since. Now do you recall this case?

After being elected President in 2016, Donald Trump made a request to the Cuban government to return her to the U.S. but because the U.S. has no diplomatic relations with Cuba, the request was denied. She remained on the FBI most wanted list. She has not served out her sentence.

Shakur has reportedly died in Cuba. It was reported by the Cuban government and her daughter. I would not trust this without seeing the body and subjecting it to a medical examiner here in the U.S. Call me crazy but I would not put it past Shakur’s family to be creating a scam to slip Shakur back into the U.S. to live anonymously with her family who has not seen her in forever.

The state department should seize the body if it is returned since she is on the FBI top ten most wanted criminals. She should ceremoniously have her casket placed into a prison cell for 24 hours so Trooper Forester and his survivors can have closure. For anybody who thinks this is an over-the-top suggestion I say this. Go back and read the details of how Trooper Foerster was viciously murdered. Then come back and talk to me.

Now this topic. I have been on a crusade since retiring as sheriff to defend the honor, courage, integrity and service of the American police officer. Ever since the incident in Ferguson, Missouri that spawned the hands up don’t shoot lie and all the way through the George Floyd incident I have watched our profession battered, smeared, and defunded. Attempts were made at criminal justice reform that strengthened criminals and caused crime to escalate. All of this occurred in a short time frame. I have watched law enforcement officers face prosecution by politically motivated prosecutors and fired for acts they had no control over.

I am sensing a wind shift back in our favor. Communities are moving past the cop hating vitriol and beginning once again to appreciate the significant role that police play in an orderly society. We have a long way to go but we are going to have to change the way we operate politically.

Ever since I can remember, most cops were advised to stay out of politics and just do your job. That day is over. Our profession was dragged into the middle of the political ring against our will. Black Lives Matter and Antifa utilized political warfare tactics against us. So here we are. Through our police unions, FOP and PBA we have to go to our state legislatures and start making demands just like every other labor organization does. We should start by pushing for a repeal of no bail laws and making killing an officer a capital offense to be charged federally so capital punishment can be applied. No longer should officers have to work past the expiration of a labor contract without heavy fines for municipalities that would go directly to police unions. Currently Milwaukee police are into their third year without a contract. The city has been dragging their feet working toward arbitration. We have to be willing to threaten job actions like other labor organizations do to get their complaints heard. Not writing citations affects city revenue. We have to be willing to do job walkouts even if temporarily. I was part of a walkout that occurred in Milwaukee in the eighties. The city immediately went to court to get an injunction. We obeyed the court order after 2 shifts but we got everybody’s attention. We need to hold massive rallies in communities and in the Capital demanding to have our grievances heard and satisfied.

Currently, municipalities do not take police labor organizations seriously by exploiting our commitment to keep doing our job. That needs to be over. Heavy political pressure will come from the public onto elected officials if we work to increase public support.

We need to collectively band together with every law enforcement labor organization in our state. We need to band together politically with fire fighter labor organizations and corrections organizations. We are called first responders and that includes other public safety units. Let us begin to act collectively instead of many disparate labor organizations.

You all have heard the phrases that there is strength in numbers and striking while the iron is hot. Let us begin to take advantage of the political winds being at our back after having it in our face or so long.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of America’s Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

Leaving a Legacy: Building a Lasting Impact That Endures

By: Joel E. Gordon

Imagine Nelson Mandela walking out of prison after 27 years. His fight against apartheid didn't end there. It sparked global freedom movements that still shape our lives today. What if you could create something like that? What mark will you leave on the world? Leaving a legacy means more than passing on money or stuff. It's about the ideas, values, and changes you spark that live on after you're gone. You can start shaping yours right now, no matter your age or background.

Legacy goes beyond what you own. It touches lives in deep ways. Think about it from old philosophers to modern leaders. They show legacy in personal growth, work success, and bigger community shifts.

Leaving a legacy is like planting a tree. You may not see it grow tall, but others will rest in its shade. It's not just cash or houses. Those fade. True legacy hands down beliefs, lessons, and sparks of hope. History proves this. Leaders like Gandhi passed on non-violence that changed nations.

Your legacy starts inside. What do you stand for? Grab a notebook. Jot down three values that guide you, like kindness or hard work. Ask yourself: How do these show up in my daily choices? This simple step helps you spot what you want to pass on. It turns vague thoughts into clear paths.

Legacies give life real purpose. They help you bounce back from tough times. When you know your impact will last, hard days feel worth it. Maya Angelou said her words could outlive her body. And they do. Her books and speeches still lift people up.

Tie your everyday moves to big goals. Start small. Each morning, pick one action that matches your long-term hopes; like calling a friend to share wisdom. Over time, these build a chain of good. You gain drive. Others feel your influence grow.

Many think you need fame or riches to leave a mark. That's not true. Everyday folks change lives too. A teacher in a small town might shape dozens of kids who then help thousands. Law enforcement officers work for the greater good every day. No spotlight required.

You don't need a big stage. Start tiny. Mentor one young person. Share a skill with a neighbor. These acts ripple out. Forget the myth of overnight success. Real legacy builds through steady steps. Pick one person today. Offer your time and watch the difference unfold.

A strong legacy has layers. It mixes who you are with what you do. Look at givers like Andrew Carnegie. He built libraries that fed minds for generations. You can weave these parts into your own story.

Your core traits set the base for everything. Integrity means doing right even when no one watches. Empathy lets you connect and lift others. Warren Buffett calls reputation your biggest wealth. Lose it, and it's gone for good.

Check your own base. List your top principles. Then rate how you live them on a scale of 1 to 10. Where do you fall short? Pick one area. Make a plan to improve, like saying no to small lies. This builds a character that inspires long after.

People around you multiply your legacy. Family hears your stories first. Friends spread your lessons. Strengthen these ties. Set up family nights to talk about your past wins and fails. Volunteer weekly at a local spot. Help with food drives or park cleanups. These links create a web. Your good spreads through it.

Work and art leave big prints. A job well done solves problems for years. Steve Jobs dreamed up devices that connect us all. His ideas keep pushing tech forward.

Capture yours. Write down key skills from your career. Teach them to someone new. Start a blog on your craft. Or invent a simple tool at work. These steps ensure your spark lights others' paths.

Build your legacy with smart plans. Make them last. Stephen Covey in his book "The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People" says think of the end first. That guides every choice.

Know where you aim. Picture your funeral. What do you want people to say? Write that eulogy yourself. It shows your true goals.

Use SMART steps for this; specific, measurable, achievable, relevant, and time-bound. For example, plan to mentor five people in a year. Review your impact each quarter. Adjust as needed. This keeps you on track.

Stories keep legacy alive. Write them down. Write your memoir. Or record videos. Get started easy. Use apps for digital files. Or tape family talks. Pass these to kids. They become treasures. Share bits online too. A simple post can reach far.

Roadblocks pop up. Time runs short. Doubts creep in. Viktor Frankl found meaning in pain. His ideas show choice matters most. Build a team for help. Join groups with like minds. Meet monthly to check progress. When doubt hits, recall past wins. Push through one day at a time. Legacy isn't set in stone. It shifts with time.

Look for signs its working. Do others quote your advice? Has your help changed a life? These show real reach. Make a checklist and track who you've touched. Note feedback from them. Review it yearly. Celebrate small wins. This proves your efforts count.

• Lives improved through your guidance.

• Stories shared that echo yours.

• New ideas born from your input.

Worlds shift fast. Keep your legacy fresh. Do legacy checks every few years. Ask: Does this still fit? Pivot if needed. Update work skills for tomorrow's jobs.

Don't go alone. Pull in family or friends. Teach them your ways. Families pass skills down. They last for generations. Plan the handoff. List what to share. Hold workshops. Show how to bake your famous pie. Or explain your business tricks. This way, your legacy grows through them.

Leaving a legacy means living with intent. It's open to everyone. Small daily choices add up to big change. You explored what it means, its parts, build tips, and ways to measure it. Key points stick. First, match your actions to core values. Second, grow strong ties with people around you. Third, record your path on purpose.

Take one step now. Sit quiet. Think of your ideal mark. Write it down. Let that guide you forward. Your legacy has already begun!

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he published his memoir Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Law Enforcement and Heart Disease

By: Joel E. Gordon

Heart disease is one of the top health threats facing police officers today. Many officers ignore the warning signs or overlook the risk factors tied to their demanding jobs. But by understanding what causes heart problems and how to prevent them, departments can help officers stay healthier longer.

Police work is stressful in ways most people will never experience. Think about those high-speed chases, tense negotiations, or responding to violent crimes. Chronic stress keeps your body in a constant state of alert, which harms your heart. Several studies link long-term stress to increased blood pressure, clogged arteries, and higher chances of a heart attack. When stress becomes a daily part of your life, it wears down your heart’s defenses over time.

Long shifts, irregular sleep, and unhealthy eating are common in law enforcement. Officers often skip meals or grab fast food on the go. Sleep is broken or inconsistent, which impacts metabolism and overall health. Many officers struggle to find time for exercise, leading to weight gain and weak heart health. High-fat diets and lack of exercise often cause issues like high blood pressure, obesity, and high cholesterol—all bad news for the heart.

Handling dangerous situations, exposure to violence, and witnessing trauma are part of the job. These experiences constantly keep stress levels high, placing extra strain on the heart. Some officers turn to substances like alcohol or drugs to cope. This can lead to high blood pressure, unhealthy weight gain, and other heart risks. Over time, these factors increase the chances of a sudden cardiac event during or after duty.

Data shows that law enforcement officers are more than twice as likely to suffer a heart attack during work compared to similar professions. According to a 2022 study, nearly 45% of career officers face some form of heart disease during their lifetime. The risk increases with age, stress levels, and unhealthy habits.

Men make up most of the workforce, and they’re usually more prone to heart issues than women. Officers over 40 face higher risks, especially if they are overweight or have family history of heart problems. Ethnic groups such as African Americans and Hispanics tend to have higher rates of hypertension and diabetes, increasing heart disease risk.

Numerous stories tell of officers collapsing during duty or retirement due to heart attacks. Some incidents involve fit, young officers whose stress levels or underlying health issues go unnoticed. These tragedies highlight why early detection and prevention are key to keeping officers safe.

Encouraging regular exercise and healthy eating makes a big difference. Departments that offer gym memberships or fitness challenges report better outcomes. Cutting down on smoking is also crucial—smoke increases blood pressure and damages arteries. Departments promoting healthy habits can lower heart risk significantly.

Mindfulness practices like meditation, as well as mental health counseling, can help officers manage stress effectively. Peer support groups create safe spaces for sharing worries and coping strategies. Resilience training programs teach officers how to handle trauma and avoid burnout.

Annual health checks save lives. Blood pressure, cholesterol, and blood sugar tests catch issues early. Officers should get regular screenings, especially if they notice symptoms like chest pain, fatigue, or shortness of breath. Early detection means treatment can start before serious damage occurs.

Departments need to regularly evaluate the health of their officers. Simple health risk assessments can identify those at higher risk for heart issues. These checks can direct officers to personalized wellness plans and medical care.

Leadership must prioritize officer well-being. Providing access to healthy food, fitness facilities, and stress management resources shows staff that their health matters. Creating a workplace that encourages healthy choices can change habits for good.

Informing officers about heart health, early warning signs, and lifestyle choices empowers them to take charge. Educational campaigns can dispel myths about exercise and diet. Well-informed officers are more likely to make healthier choices.

When officers take steps to improve their heart health, they can enjoy longer, healthier lives. Reduced medical emergencies mean fewer worries for families and communities.

Healthier officers respond faster, think clearer, and are less prone to fatigue. This benefits their safety and the safety of those they serve.

Preventive care cuts healthcare costs over time. Fewer sick days and emergency hospital visits mean savings for police departments and taxpayers alike.

The link between law enforcement work and heart disease is clear. Stress, lifestyle, and occupational hazards all contribute to serious health risks. But through proactive measures—like healthy living, mental health support, and department policies—we can protect our officers and keep them in the fight. It’s time to make officer wellness a priority because healthier officers lead to safer communities. Implementing comprehensive wellness strategies ensures safety now and in the future. Take care of yourself.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department, has been certified as a crime prevention specialist, and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

Does President Trump have to fix everything! Law enforcement executives wake up.

Is It Poaching?

An interesting feud is brewing between local sheriffs, police departments and the Department of Homeland Security. As the Trump administration has amped up its deportation efforts in US cities, the big issue initially centered on whether local law enforcement agencies would assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents in finding and arresting people who are illegally in the country. A lot of it has to do with whether a state or city declared itself as a safe haven, a sanctuary for illegals to come to that would provide them protection against immigration enforcement. This worked during the Biden administration as his policy was to defang ICE agents by preventing them from conducting raids at business and farms that were likely to employ substantial amounts of illegal aliens. Biden, had turned ICE agents into processors at detention facilities putting his catch and release efforts on steroids and dumping them into American cites.

That was then; this is now. One of the. top planks in Donald Trump’s run for re-election was to close and seal the US southern border and to begin mass deportations of people who were in the country illegally. Many local law enforcement agencies have publicly declared that they will not assist the federal government in this effort. This occurred in sanctuary states controlled by Democrat elected officials. I have a problem with this stance as many agencies have previously worked together with federal officers on task forces attacking things like human trafficking, gang crimes and illegal narcotics cases. But apparently the issue of illegal immigration is too political. Some state legislators enacted laws prohibiting their local police from working with ICE efforts. President Trump appointed a real border czar in Tom Homan to lead the effort unlike the border czar in name only, former Vice President Kamala Harris who had no interest in taking responsibility on border security.

A federal program called section 287(g) of the 1996 Immigration Reform and Responsibility Act was created by Congress to delegate state and local law enforcement the authority to enforce certain functions in illegal immigration if they signed a memorandum of understanding. They provide training on immigration law and then deputize them as deputy US Marshals. The program also provides funding like overtime on immigration work and reimbursement for jails holding illegals. Recently in Wisconsin, 13 sheriffs have agreed to sign on with the 287(g) program. As you might guess, this sign-on to 287(g) breaks along partisan lines.

Needless to say, the working relationship between ICE and local law enforcement has gotten off to a rocky start and now a new fissure has appeared.

Recently the US DHS has announced a massive recruitment and hiring campaign. Secretary Kristi Noem announced that ICE will hire 10,000 new agents to increase the administration’s deportation efforts. The recruitment effort includes a maximum $50,000 signing bonus, student loan repayment and forgiveness options, administratively uncontrollable overtime for removal operations, a 25% Law Enforcement Availability pay for HSI Special Agents and enhanced retirement benefits. That sounds enticing. So much so that it is causing some sheriffs and police chiefs of publicly complaining that DHS/ICE recruitment efforts are targeting their ranks for potential job offerings. Local law enforcement agencies are already struggling with recruitment and retention efforts. Many local agencies especially large urban ones have staff shortages and the hiring is not keeping up with officers leaving the profession either through retirements or out right resignations. Much of this is the result of the beat down cops have endured during the war on cops, defund police movement and politically motivated prosecution of officers over incidents that used to be resolved internally or in civil actions.

Questions are now arising that the DHS recruitment effort might leave local agencies already struggling with staff shortages to end up being even more depleted. Some experts are saying that this will put public safety at risk and further erode the relationship between federal and local agencies. Let’s dive into that.

DHS going after local law enforcement officers is smart recruiting. They come already trained and their experience would be invaluable. Any top company looking for talent gives credit to applicants who have experience in a particular line of work. Suburban police agencies often seek officers from larger agencies for the same reason. It cuts down on training time and they are street ready sooner.

A few local sheriffs have publicly voiced displeasure over DHS recruiting tactics. One sheriff said he felt betrayed because they have been assisting ICE with immigration. First of all, this would have been better dealt with in a phone call between the parties. This infighting does not have to and should not go on in public. I understand that local law enforcement is dealing with a retention crisis leaving many of them woefully understaffed. That is not the federal governments’ problem. It is called competition for talent, the same thing that goes on in any industry. The beneficiary of this is the front-line officer who will have career options. What is wrong with that?

In my view, some of the lamenting by local law enforcement executives is sky is falling rhetoric and here is why. Immigration enforcement is not for everybody. The benefit package will not be enough to lunge at for officers with families. Most will not want to uproot their families and have to move to a different state. These federal benefits might be attractive to an officer who is single, has nothing really tying them down to a community and only has a few years of service toward retirement age. Officers with a lot of years of service are not going to want to give those vested pension years away and have to start over working toward federal retirement eligibility. A report came out recently that shows assaults against ICE agents is up 1,000% and increased doxing of agents by pro illegal immigration advocates has led to threats being made to family members at their homes. What spouse of a police officer is going to want to sign up for that? What officer wants to expose his family to that?

While this DHS recruitment effort might look enticing today, applicants should keep this in mind. We currently have a President who has given full throated support for law enforcement in general and to ICE agents. He will not be there forever and there is no guarantee that the next President will show the same kind of support. Remember Joe Biden? He turned ICE agents into babysitters and processors in his catch and release program at detention camps. Trust that the next Democrat President will not be at all strong on illegal immigration. Then what?

For now, my advice is for everybody to demonstrate a team together attitude on making their communities safer places. Take a deep breath and let the dust settle on ICE recruitment efforts to see of it truly has a significant impact on local agencies. And for heaven sakes if you as an executive have a problem with the DHS, pick up the phone and call Secretary Noem or Border Czar Tom Homan before going off on them in public. They will return your call. If they do not, let me know.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of Americas Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com

Robotics in Policing: Enhancing Law Enforcement with Technology

By: Joel E. Gordon

Police work is changing fast thanks to robotics. Drones, robots, and smart machines now play a big role in fighting crime. They help keep officers safe, solve cases quicker, and prevent trouble before it happens. As technology improves the future of robot-powered policing looks bright as we’re seeing smarter robots taking on tasks once done only by humans, making law enforcement more effective.

Robots are now helping in risky situations like bomb threats or hostage standoffs. They can reach places people cannot and handle dangerous devices. This means fewer officers are exposed to harm. Robots also assist in getting rid of bombs or checking suspicious packages safely.

Drones and surveillance robots are flying over neighborhoods to catch trouble early. They monitor busy areas for signs of crime or unrest. With real-time data collection, police can predict where crimes might happen next. This proactive approach helps prevent incidents before they occur.

Routine tasks, like filling out reports or collecting evidence, are now automated. Robots can gather evidence or scan crime scenes quickly and precisely; integrating these machines with existing police systems makes operations smoother and saves officers time.

Types of Robots Used in Law Enforcement

• Explosive Ordnance Disposal (EOD) Robots

These robots are built to disarm bombs safely. They have arm-like limbs, cameras, and sensors to give officers a clear view of dangerous devices. Case studies show how robots saved many lives during bomb threats, especially in crowded cities.

• Drones and Aerial Surveillance Units

Drones come in various sizes with cameras and thermal imaging. They help find lost persons, monitor crowds, or survey accident sites. Drones can access hard-to-reach places quickly, providing critical info in emergencies and search-and-rescue missions.

• Ground Robots and Autonomous Vehicles

Small patrol robots move along sidewalks or inside buildings. Some are designed to track suspects or check secure areas. Autonomous vehicles can transport equipment or officers, by reducing response times and improving safety in dangerous zones.

• Robotic K-9 Units

Robots that resemble dogs are now used to sniff out drugs, explosives, or even human suspects. They’re more durable and easier to handle than real dogs, especially in harsh environments. These robotic K-9s are often used in hostage situations or bomb detections.

Using robots for surveillance raises worries about invasion of privacy. Citizens want safety but don’t want to feel watched constantly. Balancing the need for security with respecting people's rights is the balance sought.

While laws about policing robots are still developing some areas have rules on how robots can be used, but many questions remain. As technology grows, lawmakers must create clear guidelines to prevent misuse or abuse.

Deciding when a robot should use force or make arrests is tricky. Who’s responsible if a robot's decision leads to harm? Robots can have biases if they rely on certain data, so accountability and fairness are major issues.

Robots are not perfect. They can malfunction or get stuck in tough environments. Weather, dust, or debris can stop them from doing their job well. Overcoming these hurdles takes time and money.

Robots don’t come cheap. Buying, maintaining, and upgrading these machines costs significant funds. Police departments must decide if they’re worth the expenses or if traditional methods still work better.

Some community members and officers feel uneasy about robot use. Trust-building is important. Explaining how robots increase safety without spying on citizens helps gain support.

Smart AI and machine learning will make robots more adaptable. They can learn from situations and improve over time. Also, faster internet via 5G will help robots get data instantly, making responses even quicker.

Clear standards for deploying police robots are needed worldwide. Sharing experiences and creating rules will ensure responsible use. International cooperation can help develop best practices.

Officers need special training to work alongside robots safely. Developing protocols for cooperation is essential. Community engagement also builds trust and transparency about robot use.

Robotics is changing how police work is done. These machines boost safety, help solve crimes faster, and cut down risks for officers. Still, ethical issues, legal rules, and public opinion matter a lot. Finding the right balance between innovation and responsibility is crucial. With proper planning and clear standards, robots can become a powerful tool for a safer society. The future of policing will keep evolving — and robotics will be at its core, helping protect us all.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

THE CALLING: Exploring First Responder Career Paths

By: Joel E. Gordon

First responders are the backbone of emergency services. They rush into chaos to save lives, protect property, and keep communities safe. As demand for these vital roles grows, so do chances for careers in emergency response. 

First responders are trained professionals like police officers, firefighters, paramedics, and EMTs. They are the first on the scene during accidents, disasters, or crimes. Their main job is to provide immediate help, secure the area, and start the rescue process. Each role has different tasks, but all share the goal of quick, effective action.

Every year, millions of emergency incidents happen across the country. Response time can make a big difference—sometimes saving lives or preventing injuries. For example, a firefighter extinguishing a house fire or an EMT stabilizing a patient can change everything. Their work is often unseen but absolutely essential.

First responders need a mix of physical, mental, and technical skills. Sharp communication, quick thinking, and teamwork are a must. These skills readily transfer into further career growth as in the case of a trained paramedic becoming an RN as field work becomes more prohibitive as the individuals aging process takes hold. Educational requirements vary: most roles need high school diplomas or GEDs, plus specialized certifications. Strong problem-solving abilities and emotional resilience are just as important as physical fitness.

Camaraderie among first responders can be second to none. During times of trials and tribulations the support, care, and understanding of fellow first responders can make a huge difference when undergoing difficulties being dealing with critical medical conditions or otherwise in our own personal lives.

Career Paths in First Response

●Police Officer

Police officers are tasked with law enforcement, community safety, and crime prevention. Many police departments offer specialized units like K-9, cybercrime, or SWAT teams. Career growth often involves promotions to sergeant, lieutenant, or even higher roles like chief. Continuous training helps officers handle evolving challenges.

●Firefighter

Firefighters fight fires, perform rescues, and provide emergency medical aid. They often work in shifts to ensure 24/7 coverage. Advancement might include roles in fire inspection, training, or hazardous materials teams. Becoming a fire captain or fire chief is a common next step.

●Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Personnel

EMTs and paramedics respond to medical emergencies outside hospitals. Starting as an EMT is typical, then moving up to advanced paramedic roles or EMS supervisor positions. Many EMS professionals also choose to specialize in areas like EMS education or management.

●Specializations and Support Roles

Beyond core responder jobs, there are support roles like dispatchers who coordinate responses or communication specialists who operate emergency radios. Search and rescue teams, disaster response units, tactical law enforcement, and bomb squads are specialized fields requiring additional skills and training.

Most jobs in emergency services demand certain basics: age limits (usually 18+), background checks, and physical fitness tests. Candidates must also pass written exams and drug tests. Certifications like CPR and first aid are often mandatory from the start.

Attending police or fire academies is common for initial training. On-the-job training helps new hires adapt quickly. Continuing education keeps skills fresh and up-to-date. Many agencies endorse courses on advanced medical procedures or crisis management.

Local governments often fund training programs for first responders. Scholarships and grants are available, especially for those committed to long-term careers. Some employers even cover training costs after hiring, so researching available resources can reduce financial barriers.

Starting as an entry-level responder is just the beginning. Many move into supervisory roles, specialized units, or become trainers themselves. Careers in emergency management or public safety administration are also options for those ready to lead.

Keeping skills current is key. Certifications like Advanced EMT, Hazardous Materials Technician, or Incident Command System boost employability. Attending workshops and courses improves expertise and prepares responders for bigger responsibilities and future endeavors.

Experts say that career growth in this field often depends on dedication and lifelong learning. Stories of first responders who started at the bottom and now lead teams or manage entire departments are common. These roles bring a deep sense of pride and community impact.

The job is physically demanding, and responders face danger during every call. Emotional stress from traumatic scenes can take a toll. Odd hours, night shifts, and unpredictable schedules add to the challenge, making mental health and self-care vital.

Despite hardships, many find their career deeply rewarding. Saving lives, helping communities, and making a difference bring unmatched satisfaction. Personal growth, new skills, and camaraderie often result from this line of work.

First responder careers come with a wide range of options—from police and fire to EMS and beyond. Proper training and continuous education are keys to success and advancement. If you’re drawn to helping others and thrive under pressure, this field offers a fulfilling path. Exploring these opportunities might just lead you to your life's most meaningful work and a chance to make a real difference in the world out in the field and even later in a career path of service.

Joel E. Gordon, BLUE Magazine’s Editor-in-Chief, is a former Field Training Officer with the Baltimore City Police Department and is a past Chief of Police for the city of Kingwood, West Virginia. He has also served as vice-chair of a multi-jurisdictional regional narcotics task force. An award winning journalist, he is author of the book Still Seeking Justice: One Officer's Story and founded the Facebook group Police Authors Seeking Justice. Look him up at stillseekingjustice.com

As the World of Policing Turns

Every so often when I decide what to write about and comment on issues relative to policing matters, I find several to write about and then I narrow it down to one issue that I believe is begging for a deeper discussion. This time however I find it necessary to discuss three issues that came across the news in different parts of the country simultaneously.

The first is a story out of my hometown of Milwaukee, Wisconsin where Milwaukee police officers have been working without a contract since 2022. There are a lot of police agencies in the same predicament. Police union officials have accused the Milwaukee city negotiator of not bargaining in good faith and dragging their feet to go to binding arbitration. They have labeled the delay a “calculated insult.”

This is nothing new. Not only in Milwaukee but in many other large urban departments, police are at the bottom of the totem pole in terms of contract negotiations with the city. They have the most dangerous job of any city department. Cities would collapse into chaos but for the work they do. What thanks do they get? They get treated like they are forestry department workers or some other inane department in city government. I don’t recall any city worker other than a police officer who has died in the line of duty. The highest and most important priority of any city is to ensure the safety of its citizens, businesses, schools and neighborhoods. Working without an on-time contract leads to frustration and at some point, will affect job performance. The cost of living has risen since 2022 when the contract expired. Do city officials think about that?

In a statement from the union, it pointed out that, “we will not be deterred, and we will continue to fight for a contract that reflects the professionalism and sacrifice of Milwaukee police officers.” They point out that these delays are being done at a time of recruiting difficulties and staffing shortages. What prospective person would sign up for this?

The next story is out of Florida where police attempts to take a motorist into custody went sideways and not through the fault of the officers. It was your typical white officers conducting a routine traffic stop of a black male driver. Yes, you know what transpired. The driver locked himself inside, rolled up the windows and refused lawful commands to exit the vehicle. The officers ended up breaking the door window and pulling him out of the car. One officer slapped the driver in the face. He was taken to the ground still struggling and was struct again. The face strikes were benign. They didn’t pound on him.

Enter cop hating black racialist lawyer Benjamin Crump. How does he always find his was into these situations I wonder? When he shows up, a circus always follows. He holds a news conference attracting as many major news agencies as he can gather so he can spew inflammatory rhetoric to stir up outrage. He hopes for rallies and demonstrations in the street. Crump was looking for the next George Floyd incident. That never came. The driver eventually plead to resisting arrest and driving with a suspended license. The officer’s agency asked for a criminal as well as an internal investigation. Why was a criminal investigation asked for? Is this where we are at in policing? Every time reasonable and minimal force is used, we are going to call for a criminal investigation? Seriously? I watched the video and I have investigated police use of force and as sheriff had to rule on these claims. In my view there was no need to call for or conduct a criminal investigation. This is where police executive leadership comes into play. The police executive in this case needed to have the courage to explain to the public what happened and why. He needed to remind people that when an officer gives a lawful command, it is not negotiable, and you must comply. Instead, he took the cheap way out probably to cave to the wishes of police haters and head off rallies and demonstrations.

Finally, there is the continuing saga in the death of Breonna Taylor by Louisville police officers serving a search warrant. You may recall that officers were investigating a drug dealing case when they knocked on the suspect door. Breonna Taylor’s shitbird drug dealing boyfriend inside fired through the door at police. Officers returned fire and Taylor was struck and died. Officers were defending themselves and she was collateral damage. The boyfriend was not charged for shooting at police. He didn’t know who he was firing at. He said he thought they were intruders. I will come back to that.

One of the officers with outside containment fired shots thinking officers inside were under attack. His bullets struck no one. He was nonetheless charged with a federal civil rights violation against Breonna Taylor even though acquitted by a jury in state court. I do not know how prosecutors came to this conclusion, but the federal jury found that one of the officers was guilty of using excessive force. Yes, after being shot at. The prosecutor said that the officer violated one of the most fundamental rules of deadly force, that if they cannot see the person they are shooting at, they cannot pull the trigger. Really? That is precisely what Taylor’s drug dealing boyfriend did. He shot through a door without knowing who was on the other side. He triggered the events that led to Taylor’s death, and he received a two million dollar settle after suing the city, but it gets worse. This two-bit state prosecutor apparently never read the United States Supreme Court case on officer use of force named Graham v. Conner. It is a case on objective reasonableness. That applies here.

At sentencing for the federal case, the incoming Trump administration Department of Justice asked for a one-day sentence. To me even that was too much. The judge dismissed that request and handed down a 33-month sentence in federal prison for the now former Louisville officer. Where is the justice in that?

My hope is that the office that reviews pardon requests for President Trump will see this as a miscarriage of justice, and that the Biden DOJ compounded things with a politically motivated federal charge. They should issue this officer a commutation id not an outright pardon from this insane sentence considering all the circumstances. After all, justice delayed is justice denied.

Sheriff David A. Clarke Jr. is former Sheriff of Milwaukee Co, Wisconsin, President of Americas Sheriff LLC, President of Rise Up Wisconsin INC, Board member of the Crime Research Center, author of the book Cop Under Fire: Beyond Hashtags of Race Crime and Politics for a Better America. To learn more visit www.americassheriff.com